ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: I have | |||
ONLY modern Rolexes | 31 | 43.66% | |
ONLY Vintage | 10 | 14.08% | |
Both but more modern pieces | 16 | 22.54% | |
Both but more vintage pieces | 14 | 19.72% | |
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
14 May 2011, 02:58 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
|
Modern or vintage ?
what do you have or what do you prefer ?
|
14 May 2011, 03:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Jimmy
Location: Kensington. Md.
Watch: 168000
Posts: 281
|
I don't know. I have a 168000 with a 9 mil. serial number. It's 25 years old. The vintage cats don't like sapphire and modern guys don't want open sixes. Do I own vintage or modern? A 25 year old car would not be modern and here in Maryland would qualify for vintage tags, however I would not consider a 1986 car to be vintage.
|
14 May 2011, 04:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: DEEPSEA
Posts: 300
|
Only one rolex (DSSD) but my next will be a vintage. Either a red sub or an old GMT.
__________________
Jibba DSSD | Panerai 111 |
14 May 2011, 05:49 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,248
|
3 Rolex watches from the 20th century......1 from the 1960's & 2 from the 1970's.
1 Tudor watch """""""""""""""""""""""""'.......from the early 1990's. 2 Rolex watches """""""""" 21st """""""".......1 from 2003 & 1 from 2005.................. 4 w/ lug holes, 2 w/out, the newer ones still have the old rattly SS oyster bracelets! bah humbug!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
14 May 2011, 05:57 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
|
14 May 2011, 06:36 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: joe
Location: Laguna, SoCal
Watch: dd
Posts: 220
|
I like vintage but it must be well kept, preserved or maintained.
I see some vintage rolexes that really look like they were resurrected from the grave. Those I don't care for. To me being old doesn't necessarily give it value unless it still looks nice after all these years. So a nice vintage for me because you can purchase a new one anytime. |
14 May 2011, 07:46 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Hmmm let me think about it...
VINTAGE!!!!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
14 May 2011, 07:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 274
|
Modern. If they made them with lugholes, tritium, and classic case and rattle bracelets.
|
14 May 2011, 07:59 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
A man of taste... I take it your 14060m has all of the above other than the tritium!
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
14 May 2011, 08:13 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 274
|
|
14 May 2011, 08:09 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Philip
Location: NY
Posts: 851
|
I have one modern: 14060 N serial I wear every day.
I have one vintage: 5512 1.7xxx serial I look at every day. |
14 May 2011, 08:12 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I have 5 new and a Red Sub on the way. I like my new ones, however the vintage one well...........................
There is something very special about something you just can't attain just anywhere.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
14 May 2011, 08:17 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
I'm a function-first type of guy so I prefer modern watches as they tend to be, if ever so slightly, more accurate, better lume, easier to service and more comfortable (like the new bracelet on the sub). Additionally, I feel less bad putting a dent in my SubC than a vintage double-red Seadweller.
|
14 May 2011, 09:00 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I have more modern Rolex watches than I do vintage, but I think I prefer vintage.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
14 May 2011, 09:32 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I have both. Depends on what I'm doing as to which gets the nod.
|
14 May 2011, 09:36 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hudson Ohio
Posts: 3,564
|
Vintage.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.