ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

BigRedDevil · 20 May 2011, 11:12 PM

Big hi to everybody! I have already decided to get a submariner(pre-owned) as my first rolex, but i was wondering what series would be better for keeping(more timeless)? With lug holes or without? And should i get a piece with chapter ring or without? Thanks!

JUSTROLEXES · 20 May 2011, 11:23 PM

Welcome to TRF

I would get an M no hole with the rehaut

the newer the better but yet that's me

MortgageGuy · 21 May 2011, 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justrolexes

Welcome to TRF

I would get an M no hole with the rehaut

the newer the better but yet that's me

I am with Tony on this one, newer is better IMO but many will disagree

bayerische · 21 May 2011, 12:11 AM

Lug holes are cooler!

Welcome!

BigRedDevil · 21 May 2011, 01:44 AM

Mmmm, looks like its all up to an individual's preference i guess, tmr i'll hunt for submariners and compare all of them!

lortap · 21 May 2011, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedDevil

Mmmm, looks like its all up to an individual's preference i guess, tmr i'll hunt for submariners and compare all of them!

x2

But a few other thoughts to throw into the mix, lug holes some find more easy if your a Nato fan and change bracelet/bands often. Over 5 years old and you "should" factor in a service, think about adding an extra ~$500.00 to whatever your purchase price was. If you just plan on desk diving and getting caught in a rainstorm then feel free to roll the dice and get it serviced whenever

BigRedDevil · 21 May 2011, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lortap

x2

But a few other thoughts to throw into the mix, lug holes some find more easy if your a Nato fan and change bracelet/bands often. Over 5 years old and you "should" factor in a service, think about adding an extra ~$500.00 to whatever your purchase price was. If you just plan on desk diving and getting caught in a rainstorm then feel free to roll the dice and get it serviced whenever

Oh yea changing straps would be way more convenient with the lug holes, however some ppl find it an eyesore. Most probably i'll be getting 1 without cos i just love the whole thing in its original state+original bracelet!! Besides, i don't think i'd dare to mess around with it often since its gona be my first "expensive" watch. For the servicing part I'll definitely take note when was the last time it was serviced and take the fee into consideration!!

Tools · 21 May 2011, 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedDevil

Big hi to everybody! I have already decided to get a submariner(pre-owned) as my first rolex, but i was wondering what series would be better for keeping(more timeless)? With lug holes or without? And should i get a piece with chapter ring or without? Thanks!

All Submariners have lug holes..

The Sub Date does not (since ~2003)

BigRedDevil · 21 May 2011, 02:14 AM

Oh yea! Haha I am definitely getting one with date though(Sub Date) cos i think i am gonna keep and wear it for many years to come..so i'll need that date function..however i do not understand the tremendous difference in pricing between date and no date..

HL65 · 21 May 2011, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

All Submariners have lug holes..

The Sub Date does not (since ~2003)

X2!!

BigRedDevil · 21 May 2011, 06:01 PM

Just bought a 'D' series subdate! Bought it frm a 2nd hand dealer who used to work in RSC for 10+years so its serviced and polished, and in perfect condition!!

SkyKing31 · 21 May 2011, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedDevil

Big hi to everybody! I have already decided to get a submariner(pre-owned) as my first rolex, but i was wondering what series would be better for keeping(more timeless)? With lug holes or without? And should i get a piece with chapter ring or without? Thanks!

This is my simple opinion, and many other members will have different opinions .... To me, the lug holes are better .. The age just goes to show how perfect Rolex is, and how they are built to last forever

CPTL · 22 May 2011, 01:24 AM

I would definitely go with lug holes--the newest one you can find with holes would be a great pickup. If it hasn't been serviced, it would definitely be time--and when it came back it would be just like brand new!

Dr. Robert · 22 May 2011, 01:33 AM

14060.

Chipmunk · 22 May 2011, 01:38 AM

With a Sub Date, you'll never be alone.

Speed · 22 May 2011, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chipmunk

With a Sub Date, you'll never be alone.

Unless you are Paul, the VTC Guy.

DCgator · 22 May 2011, 04:15 AM

No lug holes with date. My 2c.

BigRedDevil · 22 May 2011, 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCgator

No lug holes with date. My 2c.

Yea just got that, a 'D' series subdate in perfect condition(serviced+polished). Understand where the lug holes fever comin frm tho, simply cos its original and 'tool-like', but i personally feel no lug-hole versions look better.

20 May 2011, 11:12 PM	#1
BigRedDevil "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 11	First rolex Big hi to everybody! I have already decided to get a submariner(pre-owned) as my first rolex, but i was wondering what series would be better for keeping(more timeless)? With lug holes or without? And should i get a piece with chapter ring or without? Thanks!

20 May 2011, 11:23 PM	#2
JUSTROLEXES ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Tony Geha Location: San Diego, CA Watch: Yacht-Master Posts: 51,110	Welcome to TRF I would get an M no hole with the rehaut the newer the better but yet that's me __________________ Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active

21 May 2011, 12:11 AM	#4
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Lug holes are cooler! Welcome! __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

22 May 2011, 01:24 AM	#13
CPTL "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Texas on my mind Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ Posts: 2,445	I would definitely go with lug holes--the newest one you can find with holes would be a great pickup. If it hasn't been serviced, it would definitely be time--and when it came back it would be just like brand new! __________________ 16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial

22 May 2011, 01:33 AM	#14
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,260	14060. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

21 May 2011, 01:44 AM	#5
BigRedDevil "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 11	Mmmm, looks like its all up to an individual's preference i guess, tmr i'll hunt for submariners and compare all of them!

21 May 2011, 02:14 AM	#9
BigRedDevil "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 11	Oh yea! Haha I am definitely getting one with date though(Sub Date) cos i think i am gonna keep and wear it for many years to come..so i'll need that date function..however i do not understand the tremendous difference in pricing between date and no date..

21 May 2011, 06:01 PM	#11
BigRedDevil "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 11	Just bought a 'D' series subdate! Bought it frm a 2nd hand dealer who used to work in RSC for 10+years so its serviced and polished, and in perfect condition!!

22 May 2011, 01:38 AM	#15
Chipmunk "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Alvin Location: So Cal Watch: ROLEXES Posts: 5,390	With a Sub Date, you'll never be alone. __________________ "A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats

22 May 2011, 04:15 AM	#17
DCgator "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: PNW Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2 Posts: 8,123	No lug holes with date. My 2c.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)