The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 June 2011, 11:20 PM   #1
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Submariner questions from a newbie

New to the forum, but long-time Rolex owner. My first was a Datejust in 1987, and recently I acquired two Subs, a 116610LN random serial number and a 11613LB V series.

In comparing the two, it seems to me that the two-tone is slightly heavier that the stainless. Also, both have the Glidelock bracelets, but the stainless appears to be slightly longer. To get the same fit on both, the stainless is set to its shortest length, and the two-tone is one slot out from the shortest length.

Am I imagining things, or are the overall weights and the bracelet lengths different between the two?
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 June 2011, 12:19 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Not sure about the bracelets but they should be the same lenth.But the gold parts would weigh heavier that the equivelent parts in SS. So the TT 116613 would be heavier than the all SS watch but only a small amount.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 June 2011, 05:16 AM   #3
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Not sure about the bracelets but they should be the same lenth.But the gold parts would weigh heavier that the equivelent parts in SS. So the TT 116613 would be heavier than the all SS watch but only a small amount.
Thanks for the input. My TT is definitely heavier than the SS, and the bracelet on the SS is one glidelock clasp notch setting longer than the TT.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 July 2011, 05:52 AM   #4
jay_man2
"TRF" Member
 
jay_man2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Jay
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,490
I finally figured out the bracelet differences with the Glidelock clasp. The stainless bracelet has 6 glidelock settings, with the indentation closest to the buckle a little wider than the other 5. The two-tone bracelet has 7 indentations, all of equal size.

The TT has 13 links, 8 on one side and 5 on the other. The SS has an extra small link or a modified end link on the 8 link side that locks into the indentation, and makes the bracelet slightly longer.

That explains why the band is most comfortable in the 2nd indentation on my SS Subs, and in the 4th indentation with my TT Sub.
jay_man2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.