The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 July 2011, 05:34 AM   #1
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Explorer I 39mm owners/tryers-on: Thoughts now?

The explorer i 39mm was reviled for its supposedly short hands on issue.
Question now for owners & tryers-on -- how do you like them now? After the fray, it seems like a darn nice watch.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 05:39 AM   #2
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
after trying it on, the short hand isnt an issue at all.

like it, but it was too similar too my Milgauss
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 05:44 AM   #3
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
I have handled the new Ex a few times and love it. The hands look fine to me. Nice size and visibility. Nice bracelet, nice black dial, plain and simple. Could be Rolex nicest watch. High MSRP.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:12 AM   #4
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
"Small hands" a non-issue. I like the watch & would get one if it only had a date window or I found a good beater for weekends only.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:17 AM   #5
warrior
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
There was so much said on the forum regarding the small hands. When I went to look at the watch in person, it was a non-issue.

It's sort of a "non-Rolex" Rolex without the cyclops. IMO, it's the most elegant and versatile every day sport Rolex. The bracelet is incredible and I love the matte dial.
warrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:19 AM   #6
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
I bought one and sold it 2 days later..

Not because of the hands but for some reason once I had it the watch lost it's appeal to me.
A very nice watch no doubt.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:21 AM   #7
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_mcgee View Post
"Small hands" a non-issue. I like the watch & would get one if it only had a date window or I found a good beater for weekends only.
If it had a date it would be a DJ.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:30 AM   #8
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art 1 View Post
If it had a date it would be a DJ.
a cool looking DJ
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:57 AM   #9
Explorer 2011
"TRF" Member
 
Explorer 2011's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Kris
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: Searching
Posts: 1,038
I it
__________________
__________________
ROLEX Explorer 214270
"Nil Satis Nisi Optimum..."
Explorer 2011 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 06:58 AM   #10
cedargrove
"TRF" Member
 
cedargrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
I am aware of the small hands issue but never seem to notice them whenever I see this watch. Such a classic.
cedargrove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 07:42 AM   #11
MoosicPa
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Don
Location: Moosic PA
Watch: King Midas & Subma
Posts: 1,159
Love the 39mm Expl., perfect size case and the hands are not an issue for me.

MoosicPa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 08:09 AM   #12
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
Not an issue for me. In fact, I prefer this watch to the Submariner. To each their own, of course. No regrets after 2 months. First Rolex purchase.

In fact, let me say it another way. The only other Rolex I had potential interest in as a new watch was the Explorer II, black. But I am definitely in the minority here. Not a brand loyalist.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 08:43 AM   #13
jay_kay
"TRF" Member
 
jay_kay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
I am actually considering the new Explorer I for my next purchase. Think they look great.
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
jay_kay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 10:38 AM   #14
stockrabbit
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 32
special watch. imagine if the submariner and the daytona had a love child = explorer 39mm
stockrabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 12:39 PM   #15
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
tried one on this aftn. darn nice watch. agreed--- hands not an issue whatsoever. i liked it. if i warm up to its "bigness" i might swap into one. super nice watch have to say.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 12:54 PM   #16
gold canyon
"TRF" Member
 
gold canyon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 1,188
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_mcgee View Post
a cool looking DJ
Not mention a 39 mm one!
__________________
Just a Matter of Time
gold canyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 01:49 PM   #17
DT14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: Daytona, Explorer
Posts: 218
as an owner here are my likes and dislikes of 39 mm Exp. Size-perfect, all brushed bracelet- perfect, small hands- never crosses my mind, 3-6-9 without lume or outline - very poor design and by far biggest weakness of watch, over all look - not flashy and borders on boring, but a great all purpose watch that works with a suit or casual.
DT14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2011, 02:29 PM   #18
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
No lume on 3, 6, 9 is that big a deal? Reminds me of "blackout" models. And I can still tell what time it is at night, without lume on those numerals.

I take some exception to the "very poor design" comment. I think Rolex realized they were changing the lume pattern from the 36MM Explorer 1. But, too each their own.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2011, 11:40 AM   #19
Lorenzo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Lorenzo
Location: Manila
Watch: Sub 116610 / 79090
Posts: 167
hands definitely a non-issue. the more i look at it, the more i love it. might just be my next one ....
Lorenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2011, 12:27 PM   #20
rodrob59
"TRF" Member
 
rodrob59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Rod
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: YG DD 18238
Posts: 1,540
The 39mm Exp I is my first Rolex after several Omegas. The 36 was too small after the bigger O's. I love the look and the Ian Fleming/James Bond connection appealed to me also. I like the low key look and feel although I'll still be wearing my Speedmaster Pro this week in honor of the shuttle program ending. Doubt that be able to get near Florida this week.
rodrob59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2011, 12:42 PM   #21
Watchdog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
Never liked that watch, but I have bad taste.
Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2011, 12:57 PM   #22
Boothroyd
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Boothroyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
x2
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N
Boothroyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.