ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Juggernaut · 22 July 2011, 09:08 AM

I'm not sure if this is worth of the Reference Library section, so I'm asking here:

I recently got re-aquainted with the specs of the 14060 (No date Sub) and how it has a completely different bezel than the date sub. The 14060 has a slimmer bezel.
WHY does the <classic> GMT Master II 16710 not use this slimmer bezel to make it more low profile?

If the Trip-Lock crown of the 14060 has clearance around the lower bezel, it would seem likely that the 16710's twin-lock crown would certainly have clearance as well???

Anybody???

dooder202 · 22 July 2011, 09:20 AM

I actually just realized myself that the bezel on my new GMTiiC thickness seems different than that of the sub-c.

22 July 2011, 09:08 AM	#1
Juggernaut "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 901	Bezel heights I'm not sure if this is worth of the Reference Library section, so I'm asking here: I recently got re-aquainted with the specs of the 14060 (No date Sub) and how it has a completely different bezel than the date sub. The 14060 has a slimmer bezel. WHY does the <classic> GMT Master II 16710 not use this slimmer bezel to make it more low profile? If the Trip-Lock crown of the 14060 has clearance around the lower bezel, it would seem likely that the 16710's twin-lock crown would certainly have clearance as well??? Anybody???

22 July 2011, 09:20 AM	#2
dooder202 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Eric Location: US Watch: DateJust Posts: 1,468	I actually just realized myself that the bezel on my new GMTiiC thickness seems different than that of the sub-c.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)