ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

blassy · 25 October 2011, 05:22 AM

help? Also an idea of what it might be worth please......

Dan Pierce · 25 October 2011, 05:24 AM

Looks like a black snowflake, worth $2.5 to $3K.
dP

blassy · 25 October 2011, 05:32 AM

more

harry in montreal · 25 October 2011, 05:52 AM

chris,

you really need more pics of htat watch before you pay even a cent for it. someihing about the proportion of the markers on that dial certainly bothers me. if legit, and a good bracelet is included, i say $3k.

its likely a 9411 or maybe a 7021/0. There are rampant fakes out there. get some pics of the lug stampings and a closer shot of the dial where the 200=660 and i can comment further.

blassy · 25 October 2011, 05:59 AM

I thought it looked a bit off myself, even with my limited knowledge. Also, looks like a bit too aged and too much patina for a watch of that age, no?

drockadam · 25 October 2011, 10:39 AM

Would that picture be from WatchFinder? If it is, I tried it on Saturday. What a gorgeous watch!

Brenngun · 25 October 2011, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by harry in montreal

chris,

you really need more pics of htat watch before you pay even a cent for it. someihing about the proportion of the markers on that dial certainly bothers me. if legit, and a good bracelet is included, i say $3k.

its likely a 9411 or maybe a 7021/0. There are rampant fakes out there. get some pics of the lug stampings and a closer shot of the dial where the 200=660 and i can comment further.

Harry, I'm interested in your comment about the 200=660 area on the dial. What are you looking for? Is there a tell there? Share the wisdom.

harry in montreal · 26 October 2011, 03:39 AM

chris,
actually, the dial is a bit TOO CLEAN in my opinion. the plots for the glowing tritium are weird and puffy.

you and Rick should study this string of pictures and get back to me;

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=119888

it talks about the 200=660 and shows legit dials. i ended up with a tudor sub that has a degraded dial and tired case becuase i felt more comfortable taht it was real.

good luck and remember that these watches and particularly butchered and mismatched.

blassy · 26 October 2011, 03:41 AM

I decided against it and bought the one I just started a thread about instead. I trust the seller implicitly and original is impossible to find...blue that much more so

25 October 2011, 05:22 AM	#1
blassy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: 116610 LN, 16800 Posts: 863	what tudor sub is this? help? Also an idea of what it might be worth please...... Attached Images

25 October 2011, 05:24 AM	#2
Dan Pierce 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: D'OH! Location: Kentucky Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3 Posts: 36,215	Looks like a black snowflake, worth $2.5 to $3K. dP __________________ TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club

25 October 2011, 05:32 AM	#3
blassy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: 116610 LN, 16800 Posts: 863	more Attached Images

25 October 2011, 05:52 AM	#4
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	chris, you really need more pics of htat watch before you pay even a cent for it. someihing about the proportion of the markers on that dial certainly bothers me. if legit, and a good bracelet is included, i say $3k. its likely a 9411 or maybe a 7021/0. There are rampant fakes out there. get some pics of the lug stampings and a closer shot of the dial where the 200=660 and i can comment further.

25 October 2011, 05:59 AM	#5
blassy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: 116610 LN, 16800 Posts: 863	I thought it looked a bit off myself, even with my limited knowledge. Also, looks like a bit too aged and too much patina for a watch of that age, no?

25 October 2011, 10:39 AM	#6
drockadam "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Adam Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Pepsi. Posts: 5,749	Would that picture be from WatchFinder? If it is, I tried it on Saturday. What a gorgeous watch!

26 October 2011, 03:39 AM	#8
harry in montreal "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Montreal Watch: The Habs pick 1st! Posts: 3,589	chris, actually, the dial is a bit TOO CLEAN in my opinion. the plots for the glowing tritium are weird and puffy. you and Rick should study this string of pictures and get back to me; http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=119888 it talks about the 200=660 and shows legit dials. i ended up with a tudor sub that has a degraded dial and tired case becuase i felt more comfortable taht it was real. good luck and remember that these watches and particularly butchered and mismatched.

26 October 2011, 03:41 AM	#9
blassy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Chris Location: Canada Watch: 116610 LN, 16800 Posts: 863	I decided against it and bought the one I just started a thread about instead. I trust the seller implicitly and original is impossible to find...blue that much more so

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)