ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 November 2011, 04:02 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
210 for 339
Good Day All,
I picked up a PAM210 a few days ago but I stopped by the AD and they now have a PAM339. I was thinking about getting 339, I would really like a 18K gold watch, I do like the size of the 210 but the size of the 339 fits me a bit better. The AD would take my PAM210 back and give me full credit for it. What are you thoughts on the new 42mm Rad's? I have not seen too many of them anywhere. The P.999 in-house movement looks nice! And I love the brushed gold case and tobacco dial. It would be way more then I ever spent on a watch but it would be a keeper. Thanks, Eric |
2 November 2011, 04:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 591
|
Are you referring to the PAM 338 instead of the PAM 339? nt
nt
|
2 November 2011, 05:00 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
|
beauty for sure, i want to get one for my wife since shes fallen for my 380. personally i like the larger sizes on my wrist. i tried on the ss version you are lusting after and preferred the 45mm on my 6.5" wrist.
my favorite rad is the 249 but not sure i can swing the 47mm. would love to try it on some day if i could find one! |
2 November 2011, 05:05 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
Pam 336,337,338 are the newer 42mm, with sub seconds and 60 hours power reserve.
Very nice. I love the Oro Rosa one. |
2 November 2011, 05:12 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Sorry I was talking about the 336, dam keybaord
|
2 November 2011, 05:15 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
2 November 2011, 05:23 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
That would be a sweet Rad for sure! |
|
2 November 2011, 05:26 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
|
|
2 November 2011, 06:07 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
If you are going for a gold, I would recommend you the beautiful 231
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
2 November 2011, 06:09 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
2 November 2011, 06:19 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
|
2 November 2011, 06:22 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
2 November 2011, 06:47 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
i have the 210 and find it a perfect balance in size....
tried the 232... the 47mm did not feel right at all and the numbers on the dial were bigger than the 210 (i wasn't crazy about that either) . the 42 mm looks great but i think i would have 45 envy if i got one?
__________________
|
2 November 2011, 07:25 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
2 November 2011, 07:45 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
My thought exactly, A Panerai will always be 45mm + for me
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
2 November 2011, 09:56 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
210 all da way home!!!!
__________________
member#3242 |
2 November 2011, 10:50 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: richard
Location: Tasmania
Watch: u c
Posts: 514
|
The 42mm Rad would be a lovely piece.
Thinner case I'm led to understand. I yearned for a 141, which is steel, but 42mm. Still do. Go the 336 if it feels good for you. Cheers Richard |
2 November 2011, 10:57 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
I also like the 233. But I like the thin small case of the 336.
|
2 November 2011, 11:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
stick with 210...
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
2 November 2011, 12:09 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I'm telling you....give the 210 the time. It is my fav.
I have 6.5" wrist and it is PERFECTO!
__________________
member#3242 |
2 November 2011, 11:06 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
i'm fond of the 336 and 338, so, if you like it, go for it. quite stunning and, IMHO, more "special"/interesting than the 210, at least in terms of a more "dressy" option.
FWIW, check out these great pix of the 338 posted yesterday at p.com. |
2 November 2011, 11:54 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
|
2 November 2011, 11:57 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
|
|
3 November 2011, 12:37 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Quote:
How does you strap fit? A proper fitting strap will keep it far enough up your arm to where it won't dig in. It doesn't have to be super tight to achieve this, but just right.
__________________
member#3242 |
|
3 November 2011, 12:42 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
I am going to try and move it up my wrist a bit for today.
|
3 November 2011, 12:51 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: New York
Watch: 249 & SD
Posts: 176
|
mine never digs and i wear mine a bit loose. the 104 i had before was constantly hammering my hand, though. same strap position...
|
3 November 2011, 06:28 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 158
|
hey eric, your AD in calgary has one in stock?
If so, you are lucky, that watch is hard to find, only 500ish were made i believe. I tried finding one as well, no luck. |
3 November 2011, 11:28 PM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Calgary
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
I am going to go with the 233. |
|
4 November 2011, 03:12 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joey
Location: around the Bay
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,942
|
|
4 November 2011, 04:01 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 158
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.