ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 August 2007, 02:12 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Vu
Location: Dallas area
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 2,646
|
Plasma HDTV
Planning to buy a Plasma tomorrow and I narrowed down my choices. Do any of you own or recommend one over the other? Yes I know the Pioneers are suppose to be the best, but a 42" Pioneer 720p is about the same price as a 50" Panasonic or Samsung 1080p.
42" Panasonic TH-42PX75U Panasonic TH-42Z700U Pioneer PDP-4280HD Pioneer Elite PRO-950HD Samsung HP-T4254 50" Panasonic TH-50PX75U Panasonic TH-50PZ700U Pioneer PDP-5080HD Pioneer Elite PRO-1140HD Samsung HP-T5054 Samsung FP-T5084 |
10 August 2007, 03:25 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
|
I'd recommend the Panasonic with 1080p. The Samsung doesn't keep up with the rest and Pioneer is just more expensive than the rests.
Do you prefer Plasma over LCD? Because now the trends are towards LCD. The only disadvantages of LCD compared to Plasma is in black contrast in a dark room where plasma is more natural black. However, LCD provides a more vivid color in normal lighting condition (eg. during the day). Also if you often watch action movies, plasma simply won't keep up with the intense picture movement/changes and will result in smearing. Just my opinion, I would opt for a LCD over that plasma with a bit of more money.
__________________
|
10 August 2007, 07:57 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
|
I have the 50 inch Pioneer Elite and the 42 Samsung..
They are both great!!!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN |
10 August 2007, 08:11 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,909
|
Pioneer elite or 5080. You wont regret. (panasonic also make a great plasma, pioneer is just my preference)
I have a plasma in our living room and an LCD in the kids living room and I much prefer the image on the plasma. The viewing angles on a High quality plasma such as pioneer are much better than on LCD. In my case the LCD blurs the image of fast moving objects much more than the plasma. You'll have a bunch of opinions on this subject and the debate can go on forever, and in the end you will still be in the same situation you are now. So just get what you think looks better. Also, do your own research as you are doing now. You could speak to 2-3 different people inside one store and get conflicting info. If you opt for an LCD screen, the lower the pixel response time the better. |
10 August 2007, 10:56 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
|
Pioneer plasma way to go 5080 or wait for new 1080p Pioneer end of August-September! Check out AVS forum and pricing from forum sponsors!
|
11 August 2007, 12:18 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
I spent the better part of '06 learning about new HDTV technologies. I am not one to 'flip' my possessions (whether they be HDTVs or watches!) so this investment decision was for the long haul, i.e., I would be keeping the TV for at least 10 years. Given this long ownership horizon, a technical requirement was that it be 1920x1080p resolution, i.e., the "FULL HD" standard. Given the dimensions of the viewing room the minimum display size had to be 50-inches and a flat panel design. My budget for the display was US$10K. I went into this with a bias toward Plasma because that was the generally accepted "high end" HDTV technology to go with. I subscribed to several of the videophile magazines including SOUND AND VISION, THE PERFECT VISION, and HOME THEATER and read as much as I could about products and industry trends. I also joined the online AVS Forum. In the end I narrowed it down to 2 HDTVs: the 50-Inch Pioneer Elite PRO-FHD1 Plasma and the 52-Inch Sony Bravia KDL-52XBR3 LCD. I ulitmately chose the Sony. Yes, the Pioneer has a marginal advantage with black color but the Sony has a marginal advantage with white color. Also, the Sony has the advantages of a far less reflective screen (which is particularly important when you have ambient light in the room) and less risk of image burn-in. I've had the Sony for 9 months now and I couldn't be more pleased!
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 12:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
|
Panasonic Plasma. The other advantage to plasma is the viewing angle, it's much better than LCD. I have mine on the fireplace mantle, and no matter where you sit in the room, the picture is clear. Panasonic also makes their own plasma glass, and anything from the 8th generation panel and up are wonderful, as they have true black (i.e. absence of light).
__________________
|
11 August 2007, 12:46 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
The viewing angle is 178 degrees and the blacks are excellent. And, unlike some/most plasma TVs, you don't have to close the curtains to reduce ambient light so you can watch TV during the day! The best testament to the quality of the XBR2/XBR3s is a close friend of mine who owns a 50-inch Panasonic Plasma HDTV. Whenever he comes over to my house to watch something, he is extremely jealous and offers to swap TVs with me -- NO WAY! I expect plasma technology will either be gone or have a single-digit HDTV market share in 5 years. As Wandy mentions in the post above, this trend has already begun and will just accelerate. The real debate now in home theater is HD DVD vs. Blu-ray!
__________________
Last edited by S2000 Driver; 11 August 2007 at 02:04 AM.. |
|
11 August 2007, 02:00 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Panasonic 50 inch,if the same $ as the Pioneer 42.
Panasonic and Pioneer the only choices |
11 August 2007, 02:08 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 02:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Regardless of which display technology you go with -- and you know where I stand on this -- you should seriously consider having your new display ISF Calibrated once it's installed in your home for approximately US$250.
Click on the image below to locate an ISF-certified technician for your area:
__________________
|
11 August 2007, 02:28 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Yes,sure... see who does what at the CES show in Vegas,held in Jan.Panasonic is building a huge plasma glass producing plant in Japan.
The best plasma and the best LCD is all excellent,its all a question of your preference and the $$ asked.Forget all this BS about,pixels, 10000:1 contrast.... the eye can only see 5000:1 anyway etc.Look at the picture and compare,thats the only way.Thats the test. High end audio is stereo.Largely tube based amplification and vinyl based.Again,see the various show reports from CES and THE Show,from Vegas.I use tube amps myself.Have been in the audio game for 15 years. |
11 August 2007, 02:35 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Lawson
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Watch: GMT's, Subs, OQ's
Posts: 152
|
a 50 inch plasma will draw approx. 500 watts. A similarly sized LCD will draw less than half that.
|
11 August 2007, 02:39 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: GMTII and OP!
Posts: 1,272
|
It helps with the winter heating bill.
__________________
|
11 August 2007, 02:45 AM | #15 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've had McIntosh audio equipment for 30+ years so you don't have to sell me on tube-based amplification!
__________________
|
||
11 August 2007, 03:23 AM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Quote:
Long live stereo !! |
|
11 August 2007, 03:49 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 03:58 AM | #18 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
I bought this PANASONIC VIERA 42" Plasma a couple of months ago. Came with the matching stand and glass shelves. Great stuff!! Fantastic reception!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
11 August 2007, 04:04 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Curious if you've taken the plunge and purchased a high definition disc player yet to go with your new HDTV. If so, did you go with the HD DVD or Blu-ray format? There's a big battle going on here in the US between these two competing formats but I've heard rumors that outside North America Blu-ray is the only game in town. vs.
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 04:15 AM | #20 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
11 August 2007, 04:22 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Has HD DVD won the high definition disc format war in NZ or is it still ongoing?
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 04:24 AM | #22 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
HD DVD is very popular here. The Blue-Ray stuff hasn't quite hit us yet!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
11 August 2007, 04:26 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Curious about the status of this format war in Europe. Anyone?
__________________
|
|
11 August 2007, 11:51 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Metairie, LA
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 738
|
I got a 60inch LG plasma I bought at BestBuy magnolia. I think the picture is a lot nicer than the LCD's the contrast is good, showing black nicely. I watched this movie with an ocean in it, and the picture is so real and large at my viewing distance that me and my wife got a little dizzy watching it.
One disadvantage. I don't have any permanent burn in, but when text remains on the tv too long, the text remains a little. For instance on a black screen with white text stays on too long, such as a warning, when the screen turns black you see ghost text until the screen changes to a normal picture. |
11 August 2007, 03:54 PM | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Quote:
|
|
12 August 2007, 03:03 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I'd recommend the Pioneer in a heartbeat.
My 50" Plasma is 6 1/2 years old and still as good as the day I got it. 720p and 1080i HD (no 1080p in 2001) the picture is incredible.
__________________
..33 |
12 August 2007, 03:10 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
If you're going to go plasma, there is nothing that comes close to the Pioneer Elite line and the pinnacle of the line is the 1920 x 1080p native resolution PRO-FHD1: Panasonic isn't even in the same league -- like comparing a Seiko to a Rolex!
__________________
|
12 August 2007, 03:35 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
You are correct,the Pioneers are the best, in my opinion.The price difference,in my country was huge(It differs in markup between the different importers).For me the difference was just too much.The Panasonic was the better buy.Situations around the world,differ.The backup from Panasonic is better,where I live.
That said the pricing has come down and if I buy another screen,it will again be between the Panasonic and Pioneer.Next time a 50 inch |
12 August 2007, 04:16 AM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: CT
Watch: Submariner Datum ß
Posts: 858
|
Quote:
Once again, we are in violent agreement! I'm starting to think we drink the same water, too!
__________________
|
|
12 August 2007, 09:55 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
|
I have a 50" Pioneer plasma. When I did my research it appeared to me to be the best, and I purchased it at a great savings from a dealer here in AZ. That being said, I'm not a HUGE home theater techie, so I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't something out there that's "better."
For whatever it's worth, I get a RIDICULOUS amount of satisfaction out of my TV, and you'd be hard pressed to convince me that there's anything else out there (at the same size and price point) that looks better. Almost all of my friends have purchased TV's of varying sizes, formats (LCD, Plamsa, DLP) and brands and I've still found NOTHING that looks cleaner than mine. It's simply a JOY to watch.
__________________
Throw your Rollies in the sky, wave 'em side to side, now keep your hands high. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.