ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 January 2012, 02:53 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
Why not 3136 ... then 3137
I would have thought Rolex in keeping with the naming convention established with the 3185 - 3186 (parachrom) - 3187 (paraflex) that the movement in the SubC would have changed designators from 3135 to 3136 as it has the parachrom hairspring.
Anyone know why it didn't? When will the 3135 get the paraflex shock resistant upgrade? Maybe at that point Rolex will give in and redesignate 3137? Maybe announce at Basel 2012? Thoughts? |
19 January 2012, 03:01 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Christophe
Location: France
Watch: DJ/Gmt2/IIc/E2/ToG
Posts: 434
|
.
3136 already exists,with Blue parachrom hairspring and paraflex shock absorber. It is in the DateJust II . |
19 January 2012, 03:03 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
So why does the sub's movement still say 3135?
|
19 January 2012, 03:03 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Beat me to it, Christophe
|
19 January 2012, 03:03 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
19 January 2012, 03:08 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
|
19 January 2012, 03:11 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
19 January 2012, 03:12 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Christophe
Location: France
Watch: DJ/Gmt2/IIc/E2/ToG
Posts: 434
|
Essentially because it isn't a 3136 ...
More seriously and to make it simple, hairspring is an easily swappable part, so Rolex didn't modified 3135 name just for parachrom insertion. Where paraflex is a part that modify the movment, thus explaining a name change. 3132 vs 3130 is the same, adding paraflex. 3186 vs 3185 wasn't only the changed hairspring. Mechanism was modified too. Later on, 3187 added the paraflex. One exception is 3131 vs 3130 : parachrom only (as far as I know). My guess. |
19 January 2012, 03:14 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
|
19 January 2012, 03:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
|
When it comes to Rolex and why they do what they do it's.......a mystery wrapped in an enigma!!!
__________________
SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!! |
19 January 2012, 04:07 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Luck
Location: Toronto
Watch: yourself
Posts: 477
|
Yeah, why didn't Rolex put Paraflex shock systems in the Sub and DSSD?! They're sport models afterall.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.