ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 February 2012, 12:11 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in the sky
Posts: 208
|
pam 232 vs 372
hello guys,
Would you sell your 232 to fund for 372? If you have to take only one, which one will you take between 232 and 372? please give me your opinions. Thank you and have a great day |
19 February 2012, 12:13 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Keep the 232.
Reason - simple, they don't make it anymore. The 372 is a "regular" production piece for now. So there will be more opportunity. Thats what I'd do anyway. |
19 February 2012, 12:41 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I've worn both and it is a toss up. If you love the 232, you'll just regret selling it.
__________________
member#3242 |
19 February 2012, 01:39 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
232 for me
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
19 February 2012, 01:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
I would keep the 232...but then again..Panerai will probably release it with inhouse movement..ala 448...
toss up as the 372 is pretty special...
__________________
too much into watches... |
19 February 2012, 04:29 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
I'd suggest that if funds allow to initially keep the 232 and get the 372. Then offload the one you least like. I'd think that at current prices (assuming that both are/were purchased at list) that you'd not lose out much.
Or you could do what I did, and keep both...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
20 February 2012, 09:08 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Quote:
Sad but true. Or wait, maybe I can snatch one up?!?!? Needs a seconds hand though.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
|
20 February 2012, 11:02 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Indonesia
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,277
|
almost think the same thing, but 232 stays for me.
__________________
Baume & Mercier Riviera Rolex GMT II c, DJ 116234, Sub 16610, EXP 2 16570 Panerai 111 , 232 |
20 February 2012, 11:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 263
|
372 ALL THE WAY! LOVE my 372, its fantastic
|
20 February 2012, 12:14 PM | #10 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,005
|
Love the 372 but not sure I'd part with a 232....tough decision.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
20 February 2012, 03:01 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: colorado
Posts: 23
|
232 without a doubt. It is an SE and classic. Although it appears to be very nice in it's own right, the 372 is the pretty face of the moment and regular production. No brainer decision for me.
|
22 February 2012, 12:25 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
|
I never warmed up to the 372, the 232 on the other hand has always wowed me with its simple beauty. And I got to tell you, there are quite a few 372 not selling down here at the moment..
__________________
My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417. |
22 February 2012, 09:51 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
|
Both amazing. One is an SE, one isn't. But one has a plexi, and one doesn't (but probably should've had one). I like the 372 more, but just by a hair. If you're not sure, and you might sell it later, stick with the 232.
__________________
Instagram: dukerules |
24 February 2012, 12:03 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: in the sky
Posts: 208
|
thank you all... tough decision... gotta go try the 372 tomorrow and will see if it smiles or not
|
5 May 2012, 11:55 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
|
Did it smile??
|
5 May 2012, 12:59 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Tough call. I don't really care about the whole SE makering gimmic thing, they are both in rather small numbers anyhow, if that matter.
Personally I'd go with the 372. |
5 May 2012, 02:31 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 343
|
372 for sure
__________________
Super fans: Watcholic.... |
5 May 2012, 04:50 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 393
|
I like the look of the 372, but the 232 wears much better, at least for me since I have a small wrist. I can wear the 232, but can't come close to pulling off the 372
|
5 May 2012, 05:21 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Here and there
Posts: 935
|
I dig the 232..just not on my wrist. 372 would be an easy choice for me.
|
5 May 2012, 05:25 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Barrowford
Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54
Posts: 1,699
|
I have been lucky enough to own both. Both wear almost identically in my opinion. In the end the crown guard won it for me and this is the one I kept....
__________________
Rolex Explorer 214270, Omega Speedmaster '1957 Relaunch' 3594.50.00, Panerai Luminor 1950 PAM00127-E, Panerai Radiomir 1936 PAM00249-I, Panerai Mare Nostrum PAM00716-T, Panerai PAM00785-Q Set, Panerai Luminor Black Seal PAM00594-Q, Panerai Luminor Daylight PAM00604-Q, Tudor Black Bay 54 79000N, Heuer Carrera Re-Edition CS3113, Hamilton Military W10 & TAG Heuer F1
|
5 May 2012, 10:18 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
Put the 372 on and I bet you buy it--be VERY careful
|
5 May 2012, 10:41 PM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,297
|
that's a TOUGH one, but, i think i'd keep the 232. something about the gold hand + the font on the 232. good luck with the choice.
|
5 May 2012, 10:59 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
232
|
5 May 2012, 11:13 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
The 372 gets my vote.
|
11 June 2013, 07:41 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
|
Wondering what it was in the end ....
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a |
12 June 2013, 05:43 PM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: singapore
Watch: cosmograph daytona
Posts: 388
|
372, looks better in real than on photo
|
13 June 2013, 12:11 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 1,107
|
Both are true DNA watches. My pick would be the 372 however. Has a little more sportiness to it than the 232.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.