The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 March 2012, 07:08 AM   #1
Le Chef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
Rolex off the rails

The Skydweller is an unmitigated dog of a design - one of the worst imaginable. How could they? The Daytona has become the gangbanger's watch of choice.

The only saving grace is the new Sub No Date: but who stole the lug holes?

If this is the new Rolex I'm mightily glad I bought the old before it went down the tubes.
Le Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:10 AM   #2
JustABreathAway
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States
Watch: The Reference
Posts: 1,743
I think the Sky Dweller is fantastic, beautifully designed with a useful but simple to use set of functions, and aesthetically pleasing.
JustABreathAway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:12 AM   #3
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
The Skydweller is an unmitigated dog of a design - one of the worst imaginable. How could they? The Daytona has become the gangbanger's watch of choice.

The only saving grace is the new Sub No Date: but who stole the lug holes?

If this is the new Rolex I'm mightily glad I bought the old before it went down the tubes.
I disagree - You're someone who has a preference towards vintage Rolex. That's great, but remember, there are plenty of people who prefer modern Rolex. I personally love the direction Rolex has been going since 2008 - minus the rainbow Daytona
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:12 AM   #4
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,215
The Sky Dweller is not my cup of tea but I wouldn't go that far. It will certainly find an audience and probably do well.
We don't have to like everything produced by Rolex. Variety is the spice of life and thank God we don't all like the same thing.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:12 AM   #5
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
If you really want to complian why not do so in one of the other 25 threads complaining about it. Personally getting a brand new model from Rolex is a great day. Most of the time it's barely anything. Maybe next time Rolex will consult with you before making any changes.... LOL. Do you drive a 35 year old car?? Not like change??? Lug holes are fine but why can't people accept any kind of change??? Go buy your old vintage watched and be happy. I'll stick with the new.
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:17 AM   #6
jamesw
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 209
I think some TRF input would help point Rolex in the right direction.
jamesw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:17 AM   #7
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
The Skydweller is an unmitigated dog of a design - one of the worst imaginable.
Disagree. I posted my thoughts on all the new lineup in the 1000-page long skydweller thread, where it promptly got lost of course, so I'll repost my thoughts on the lineup here:

Wow, I go afk for 1 day and come back to this. Thoughts:

Skydweller
My first reaction -- F-U-G-L-Y

Then I look at the functionality. Wow. Though the 24-hr indicator rotating anti-clockwise is a bit.... discomfitting?

The everose on leather is freaking gorgeous. More dials are sure to follow, and I'm sure eventually it'll come in TT and, hopefully, SS. It's definitely a new and interesting take on a GMT.

New ND Sub:
Congrats to those who picked up the last of the ND Subs this last year before a non-Ceramic sub became an extinct creature.

New YM:
They missed the boat (lol) on not taking the opportunity to make a red or roulette date wheel.

Bi-directional bezel? Is that new?

Awesome props on updated bracelet. Platty dial is still the best, the new blue is... meh.

SS DJII:
Predictable. I like them okay -- I like the fluted bezel better and don't regret getting it.

Zebra DJ: Needs to be shot and put out of its misery.

Blinged out Daytone: Likewise. I haven't seen such a horrid cacophony of color collision since my last acid trip around tie-dyed hippies. If you buy this, you just spent a TON of $$ essentially buying a Bill Engval "Here's Your Sign" Sign to wear on your wrist.

Lady DJ with the 6 o'clock bling: I like it, and I think the ladies will like it. I hope it goes over better than the flower dials. I also like to see something new come along in 26mm. I like the regular diamonds better than the colored ones.

Ruby and Emerald DD and DDII: Ick. More bad juju.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:20 AM   #8
aeon888
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
Whether the skydweller is good or not, I really don't care because I couldnt afford it anyway.. hehehe But I am dying to get that Sub C no-date. When will it be available to ADs? September? I live in Nebraska, we are always behind or late in everything here. Maybe our AD will get the new Sub C no-date by 2013! ;(
aeon888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:23 AM   #9
rocco1109
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Will
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 556
Gangbanger?

What is this in reference to?
rocco1109 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:24 AM   #10
Time2time
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
Le Chef. Are you sure??

Skydweller is a beauty and what is it with you fans
of lugholes?? Take your bracelet off a lot do you??

Move on mate. Times change, new innovative designs and old designs get updated.

Suggest you move on to the vintage forum me thinks.
Time2time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:28 AM   #11
aeon888
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocco1109 View Post
What is this in reference to?
I think he meant those with grilled gold teeth, 10 large gold rings on each finger, large gold chain necklaces with very large diamond encrusted pendant, loose sagging pants below butt, drives an all chrome-accented Escalade on 25 inch spinner wheels, very loud obnoxious music with loud bass, I suppose. (stereotyping! hehehe)
aeon888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:33 AM   #12
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
The Sky Dweller shouldn't be my cup of tea, but I do actually like it. It's a country mile from my normal choice, but very nice.
__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:34 AM   #13
jrbar-on
2024 Pledge Member
 
jrbar-on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 803
Well, I drive a 21 year old car ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwalker View Post
If you really want to complian why not do so in one of the other 25 threads complaining about it. Personally getting a brand new model from Rolex is a great day. Most of the time it's barely anything. Maybe next time Rolex will consult with you before making any changes.... LOL. Do you drive a 35 year old car?? Not like change??? Lug holes are fine but why can't people accept any kind of change??? Go buy your old vintage watched and be happy. I'll stick with the new.
(a Toyota Corolla with 156K mile) and I don't like the Sky Dweller either. While I think that it is extremely innovative and I admire the engineering in it I am not fond the dial. I don’t know how I would have designed it but definitely not the way it is. I do like the Sub and the only reason why I would like the lug holes is so that it is easier to swap out the bracelet if one wants to.

Cheers,

Jonathan.
jrbar-on is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:34 AM   #14
rocco1109
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Will
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 556
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeon888 View Post
I think he meant those with grilled gold teeth, 10 large gold rings on each finger, large gold chain necklaces with very large diamond encrusted pendant, loose sagging pants below butt, drives an all chrome-accented Escalade on 25 inch spinner wheels, very loud obnoxious music with loud bass, I suppose. (stereotyping! hehehe)
And they're all gangbangers? Wow.
rocco1109 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:37 AM   #15
petesjag
"TRF" Member
 
petesjag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustABreathAway View Post
I think the Sky Dweller is fantastic, beautifully designed with a useful but simple to use set of functions, and aesthetically pleasing.
Having spent a good amount of time thisevening studying this new model, I think it is an awsome direction that Rolex has choosen. The technology is refreshing and interesting. The dial is something which looks off in pictures but will awe all of us once on the wrist..be assured!
petesjag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:38 AM   #16
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time2time View Post
Le Chef. Are you sure??

Skydweller is a beauty and what is it with you fans
of lugholes?? Take your bracelet off a lot do you??

Move on mate. Times change, new innovative designs and old designs get updated.

Suggest you move on to the vintage forum me thinks.
..... You are RIGHT! Us Lug Hole loving people must move to the Vintage Forum because Rolex has moved on from Lug Holes forever...

Also, to your lack of understanding of our love of lug holes let me enlighten you.... Lug Holes with the shoulderless springbars are way more secure than any modern springbar set up, and Lug Holes were a staple on the Oyster case or many many years. Finally, YES I beleive that a lot of people like to change watch straps quite frequently therefore Lug Holes make that whole process a alot easier.

My
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:39 AM   #17
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by petesjag View Post
The dial is something which looks off in pictures but will awe all of us once on the wrist..be assured!
X 2....The live pictures that have been posted look fantastic compared to the Website pics.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:42 AM   #18
A.J.R.
"TRF" Member
 
A.J.R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
Gangbangers wear Daytonas? Time to choose my colors and pick up a gat.
__________________
[<a href=http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i202/tonelar/watches/club/soc.jpg target=_blank>http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i2...s/club/soc.jpg</a>
A.J.R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:42 AM   #19
general
"TRF" Member
 
general's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 723
"The Daytona has become the gangbanger's watch of choice."
Are you serious? Why would you make such a statement?

Rolex was missing a model with more complication which is expected from a company such as Rolex.
If you guys don't like the modern models, stick with the vintage ones.
general is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:43 AM   #20
p_mcgee
"TRF" Member
 
p_mcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
Not a fan of the dial design (or the price tag) but the complications are great and a step forward for Rolex. In my opinion, if they eventually introduce a stick dial with a smooth bezel, or find some other way to unclutter the dial, it will be a winner.
p_mcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:44 AM   #21
A.J.R.
"TRF" Member
 
A.J.R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by general View Post
If you guys don't like the modern models, stick with the vintage ones.
There are plenty out there which need good homes.
__________________
[<a href=http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i202/tonelar/watches/club/soc.jpg target=_blank>http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i2...s/club/soc.jpg</a>
A.J.R. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:46 AM   #22
aeon888
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocco1109 View Post
And they're all gangbangers? Wow.
No, they are not. But you didn't read my last statement. That is why it is called "stereotyping!", because they are being stereotyped into being a part of a group even though they are not ALL gang bangers.
aeon888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:51 AM   #23
JustABreathAway
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: United States
Watch: The Reference
Posts: 1,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by petesjag View Post
Having spent a good amount of time thisevening studying this new model, I think it is an awsome direction that Rolex has choosen. The technology is refreshing and interesting. The dial is something which looks off in pictures but will awe all of us once on the wrist..be assured!
I agree with most of what you said - I was not being sarcastic or facetious with my post.

My only disagreement with you is that I already think the dial looks beautiful, especially in Yellow Gold Champagne!
JustABreathAway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:56 AM   #24
Preacher
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Middle England
Watch: Rolex of course
Posts: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by QCASANOVA View Post
Finally, YES I beleive that a lot of people like to change watch straps quite frequently therefore Lug Holes make that whole process a alot easier.

My
"Strap changers" are still a minority of all Rolex customers. Lug holes were useful back when Rolex were heavy duty tool watches but Casio have now taken over that role so imo modern Rolex look better/cleaner without the holes.

Btw, I love the SkyD! I think it's a stunning piece.
Preacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:56 AM   #25
TSts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timber Loftis View Post
Disagree. I posted my thoughts on all the new lineup in the 1000-page long skydweller thread, where it promptly got lost of course, so I'll repost my thoughts on the lineup here:

Wow, I go afk for 1 day and come back to this. Thoughts:

Skydweller
My first reaction -- F-U-G-L-Y

Then I look at the functionality. Wow. Though the 24-hr indicator rotating anti-clockwise is a bit.... discomfitting?

The everose on leather is freaking gorgeous. More dials are sure to follow, and I'm sure eventually it'll come in TT and, hopefully, SS. It's definitely a new and interesting take on a GMT.

New ND Sub:
Congrats to those who picked up the last of the ND Subs this last year before a non-Ceramic sub became an extinct creature.

New YM:
They missed the boat (lol) on not taking the opportunity to make a red or roulette date wheel.

Bi-directional bezel? Is that new?

Awesome props on updated bracelet. Platty dial is still the best, the new blue is... meh.

SS DJII:
Predictable. I like them okay -- I like the fluted bezel better and don't regret getting it.

Zebra DJ: Needs to be shot and put out of its misery.

Blinged out Daytone: Likewise. I haven't seen such a horrid cacophony of color collision since my last acid trip around tie-dyed hippies. If you buy this, you just spent a TON of $$ essentially buying a Bill Engval "Here's Your Sign" Sign to wear on your wrist.

Lady DJ with the 6 o'clock bling: I like it, and I think the ladies will like it. I hope it goes over better than the flower dials. I also like to see something new come along in 26mm. I like the regular diamonds better than the colored ones.

Ruby and Emerald DD and DDII: Ick. More bad juju.
For those who say Rolex is tasteful when it comes to gems on their bezels, dials and cases and for those who also say that Rolex is a statement of understated elegance without said gemstones, I offer to ask, what do you think of Rolex now? * BOOM! * - is that where Rolex is headed in the future?
__________________

116710LN
116300blro
TSts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:57 AM   #26
floater156
"TRF" Member
 
floater156's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.J.R. View Post
Gangbangers wear Daytonas? Time to choose my colors and pick up a gat.
I gotcha back homie, strap up - let's ride!
__________________
Lead by example through production.
floater156 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 07:59 AM   #27
scarab007
"TRF" Member
 
scarab007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Fran
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Chef View Post
The Skydweller is an unmitigated dog of a design - one of the worst imaginable. How could they? The Daytona has become the gangbanger's watch of choice.

The only saving grace is the new Sub No Date: but who stole the lug holes?

If this is the new Rolex I'm mightily glad I bought the old before it went down the tubes.
All right, I am a ganbanger now with my Daytona on. I think I might go to oak town tonight in new M56S and do some ganbanger stuff. Not sure what that is though.
scarab007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 08:01 AM   #28
Time2time
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by QCASANOVA View Post
..... You are RIGHT! Us Lug Hole loving people must move to the Vintage Forum because Rolex has moved on from Lug Holes forever...

Also, to your lack of understanding of our love of lug holes let me enlighten you.... Lug Holes with the shoulderless springbars are way more secure than any modern springbar set up, and Lug Holes were a staple on the Oyster case or many many years. Finally, YES I beleive that a lot of people like to change watch straps quite frequently therefore Lug Holes make that whole process a alot easier.

My
Fair enough BUT, more secure? My watches haven't fallen off my wrist yet!
Oh well, if they make you happy.
Time2time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 08:02 AM   #29
HERITAGE82
"TRF" Member
 
HERITAGE82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Preacher View Post
"Strap changers" are still a minority of all Rolex customers. Lug holes were useful back when Rolex were heavy duty tool watches but Casio have now taken over that role so imo modern Rolex look better/cleaner without the holes.

Btw, I love the SkyD! I think it's a stunning piece.
Other than the Sub being used on a NATO strap for diving, what aspect of them being "heavy duty tool watches" required the need of Lug Holes??

I beleive Rolex's initial intension of Lug Holes was strength and durability and the only reason it strayed from them is due to the "jewelry" aspect that watches have become today.
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270
- Tudor Black Bay - 79230B
- Tudor Chronograph - 79270P
- Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv.
- Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype
HERITAGE82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2012, 08:03 AM   #30
Timber Loftis
"TRF" Member
 
Timber Loftis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Jon
Location: Chicago
Watch: IIc,DJII,P244,A1-Z
Posts: 2,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeon888 View Post
Whether the skydweller is good or not, I really don't care because I couldnt afford it anyway.. hehehe But I am dying to get that Sub C no-date. When will it be available to ADs? September? I live in Nebraska, we are always behind or late in everything here. Maybe our AD will get the new Sub C no-date by 2013! ;(
In September-ish you'll be able to buy it on the FS forum here above market price. ADs will get it in Oct/Nov in limited supply. By February you'll likely be able to walk into an AD and see one that's available for purchase and not promised out to someone who pre-purchased.
Timber Loftis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.