ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 September 2007, 07:31 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
Diving to 160m
Here's a link for all you guys who worry about cleaning, swimming, shooting, showering, diving and golfing, etc. with your Rolex. One of my buddies was a diver on this expedition to explore the Carpathia, which rests at a reasonable 160 meters (525 feet).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/new...m&asb=1&news=1 If you watch the video closely, you can see Jeff Cornish is wearing either a Sub or SD. Here is a link to the expedition's web site. Carry on.
__________________
Subfiend |
26 September 2007, 07:36 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
26 September 2007, 08:06 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
Cool
|
28 September 2007, 03:31 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
I know you are going to see at least one Sea-Dweller on this show. Richie Kohler, on eof the divers, wear a SD. The dives were to 400 feet using closed circuit rebreathers.
"Titanic's Tragic Sister", detailing the 2006 Britannic Expedition, will be premiering this October 14th at 9:00 PM on the History Channel in the U.S.
__________________
Subfiend |
28 September 2007, 03:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: Oysterdate 6694
Posts: 2,713
|
I must admit that when I am channel surfing and run across a dive show I always watch to see if one of the divers is wearing a sub or sd..one time I saw a diver wearing a Rolex daytona!
|
28 September 2007, 11:10 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
If the guy on television was wearing the Daytona while diving in a submersible, that was me. I was also wearing a SD on the other wrist, because I had to time two different tasks simultaneously.
I really wish they would stop running that show. I really don't like it.
__________________
Subfiend |
28 September 2007, 12:55 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,060
|
Can you wear a GMT Master II _ C
if you're planning on diving across two time zones???
|
28 September 2007, 07:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
Diving across two timezones??
Wow thats much more than the 100 meter rating allowed on the GMTs. Only its in the horizontal direction this time instead of vertical.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
28 September 2007, 07:52 PM | #9 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
I wonder if somebody has gone for diving with a gmt master II.
|
30 September 2007, 05:37 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
I have, but not often. Only when I travel far, far away on a non-dive trip and the GMT-II is more useful overall. If it's a dedicated dive trip, I wear a Sub or SD.
__________________
Subfiend |
30 September 2007, 05:58 AM | #11 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
How deep did you go with your gmt master ?
|
30 September 2007, 05:59 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
Since most recreational or military tactical dives are under 30 meters, a GMT II would be just fine for diving.
Hard swimming or movement of your wrist in the water, based on a thread a long time ago where some pretty serious Physic equations came out, will only add about the equivelent of 5 extra meters of depth on to your watch. Since the GMT II is rated to 100 meters, unless you are doing some serious saturation, commercial, or exploration diving, your GMT II is up to the task. Deepest I have ever gone on a dive is around 55 meters, and that required decompression stops on the way back to the surface and spare tanks being lowered from the Zodiac to us. Now personally I have not taken my GMT IIs or Explorer IIs on a dive, but I would not hesitate to do so. |
30 September 2007, 06:00 AM | #13 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Thanks for the info chad
|
1 October 2007, 07:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
I stick to within 140 feet of the surface on scuba. This is fine for the GMT-II.
The GMT-II is not my first choice for diving (actually, it's my third choice after my Subs and SD), but I would not hesitate to wear it again if I had a business trip where I also had an opportunity to do some diving. If I had the new GMT-II, I would consider it to be interchangeable with my Sub for warm water diving, and hence my second choice. The SD is my first choice.
__________________
Subfiend |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.