The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 May 2012, 08:34 AM   #1
suntaelee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 111
Newer Bracelet for the older 14060M? Anyone tried?

Can you buy the newer bracelet that comes in the SubC and other Rolex watches with the newer clasp and put it on an older 14060M models? Has anyone tried and have pics???
suntaelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 09:02 AM   #2
roger0770
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
it wouldn't work. the fact that 93250 bracelet does not work on the 14060m case means that the subc bracelet won't fit. however, you could take the new sub c bracelet and fit it on a 16610. someone did that just not too long ago.
roger0770 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 09:05 AM   #3
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by roger0770 View Post
it wouldn't work. the fact that 93250 bracelet does not work on the 14060m case means that the subc bracelet won't fit. however, you could take the new sub c bracelet and fit it on a 16610. someone did that just not too long ago.
^^^^^^this
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 10:39 AM   #4
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
You CAN put the new glidelock clasp on a 14060M - just not the bracelet endlinks.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 01:29 PM   #5
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
You CAN put the new glidelock clasp on a 14060M....
I understand the rationale behind such a desire, but I must say that to me, it just seems wrong.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 01:49 PM   #6
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott View Post
I understand the rationale behind such a desire, but I must say that to me, it just seems wrong.
this.

and besides, the 93150 is so so comfortable without the sel.

but i know, tastes differ.
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 05:39 PM   #7
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
You CAN put the new glidelock clasp on a 14060M - just not the bracelet endlinks.
Agree but the clasp alone will cost upward of a $1000.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 01:54 AM   #8
roger0770
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Agree but the clasp alone will cost upward of a $1000.
such is watch collecting. you got to pay to play, right?
roger0770 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 04:55 AM   #9
stockae92
2024 Pledge Member
 
stockae92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
You CAN put the new glidelock clasp on a 14060M - just not the bracelet endlinks.
i *think* the 14060M bracelet has less removeable links than the one on 116610, so it may not be as wearable for smaller wrist size
__________________
135
├┼┼╕
246 R
stockae92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 01:32 PM   #10
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
I'm the total opposite, I wouldn't mind the older style bracelet with solid end links and a tuna clasp on my Sub-C.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 02:06 PM   #11
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
I have been told by a man who knows his Rolex watches that the solid end-link bracelets have a weak point at the point where the first link attaches to the end-link with a spring bar and that this is not the case with the hollow end-link.

This individual claims to have seen far more failures at this point with solid end-links than with bracelets with the hollow end-link.

I was quite surprised to hear this, as I, too, felt that the Sub should have gotten the same bracelet arrangement that my Explorer (114270) has.

It seems that progress can sometimes be a fickle thing.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 06:11 PM   #12
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
none of the newer bracelets can be bolted on to the 14060

clasps, no probs

what i like about the 14060 is the lug holes, pretty cool.

the new Sub shines too much, much like my mum's fine Georg Jensen tableware
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 08:58 PM   #13
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
although not a straight fit the sels bracelets can be modified to fit the 14060m. forum member and mod. larry "tools" did this in a previous thread. i think it was last year.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 09:11 PM   #14
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny View Post
although not a straight fit the sels bracelets can be modified to fit the 14060m. forum member and mod. larry "tools" did this in a previous thread. i think it was last year.
Its not just the SEL mod because of the lug hole case different lug pins must be used.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 May 2012, 09:37 PM   #15
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Its not just the SEL mod because of the lug hole case different lug pins must be used.
great additional information on the modification. cheers padi.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 03:28 AM   #16
suntaelee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 111
always grateful for all your responses. i was just wondering about it since I wanted to trade in my 14060m for a subC. the only thing I like about the newer subC is the bracelet and the ceramic bezel. reasons that held me back was that the new subC is a bit thicker, a bit flashier, and those hour mark dots are huge! oh, and i do not like cyclops at all... hope the new ND subC looks and feels good.
suntaelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 03:30 AM   #17
joesephcho
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Submariner ND
Posts: 188
i'd say keep your 14060.
joesephcho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 May 2012, 02:05 PM   #18
nch209
"TRF" Member
 
nch209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,775
I love the glidelock, but the older bracelets have stood the test of time and are quite comfy.

The glidelock bracelets are tough to come by, but the hunt is part of the fun. I sourced a used one here, a new one elsewhere--- and another new one by selling a new 116610 on just a NATO for a heck of a deal!!! SHHHHHHHH--- dont tell, or everyone will be doing it!!!! LOL~!!!!! My "parts" stack continues to grow!!!!
__________________
nch209
nch209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.