ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 May 2012, 03:44 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 2
|
First Rolex
hi guys,thinking of getting a rolex sub.choosing between a steel and half gold model.any advise?
|
15 May 2012, 03:45 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: AJ
Location: Oregon
Watch: SUBC, DJII
Posts: 1,827
|
Buy the one that makes you smile the most.
__________________
|
15 May 2012, 03:46 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
1/2 gold is TT (two tone)....
SS is more versitle for an everyday watch, but if you wera gold everyday TT won't be a problem.... Enjoy the watch, either way |
15 May 2012, 03:46 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,386
|
nice to have both
|
15 May 2012, 03:48 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
I've never really been a fan of TT, but it really is one of the most "personal preference" characteristics of a watch. Try them both on for an extended amount of time in the store... after a while you'll know which one looks better on you.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
15 May 2012, 03:48 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
Welcome to TRF, great choice whatever you decide
|
15 May 2012, 04:13 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
|
Try 'em on. Decide. Don't look back.
|
15 May 2012, 04:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,883
|
|
15 May 2012, 05:00 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
I prefer TT because I have a yellow gold wedding band. If I had a white gold band, I'd choose the SS sub.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
15 May 2012, 05:16 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
I prefer ss, but both look great
__________________
|
15 May 2012, 05:33 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 67
|
I didn't like the TT at first. But I've seen a few guys wear it well. Def looks a bit dressier than the SS.
|
15 May 2012, 06:19 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Alfred
Location: DC Metro
Watch: None
Posts: 29,368
|
GMT or a Sub and you cant go wrong
__________________
NEED PC HELP? ASK HERE! Watches: Patek 5205G | Patek 5167A | 16613 Serti | 116718 Green | 216570 Black | 16700 Pepsi Wish list: Patek 5726/1 | AP RG Ceramic | Patek 5712 | Patek 5130 |
15 May 2012, 06:34 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: J. Knapmeyer
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: 116520 & PAM 321
Posts: 226
|
My preference is SS but you must go with the one that talks to you.
|
15 May 2012, 07:16 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Ali
Location: California
Watch: GMT II (Coke)
Posts: 1,747
|
Either a GMT or Sub SS, it is a classic look! try both on and see which one you like the best.
__________________
A Crown for Every Achievement |
15 May 2012, 07:59 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Either one would be an excellent choice. I prefer the SS though.
Good luck! |
15 May 2012, 08:14 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 156
|
Both beautiful classic watches. I've currently got an SS 16610, and planning to add a TT blue 16613 at some point in the future. But if I only had one Sub, it would be an all steel one. Good luck with your decision!
|
15 May 2012, 08:17 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 4,345
|
I prefer the SS, I would get the fully gold instead of the TT
|
15 May 2012, 08:55 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
SS gets my vote
|
15 May 2012, 09:24 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Medford, NY
Watch: Datejust 126331
Posts: 129
|
Tt
|
15 May 2012, 09:39 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Get the one you like the best.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
15 May 2012, 10:28 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I'm a fan of tt, but stainless is a near perfect material for watches. My first Rolex was a tt GMT on a jubilee (38 years ago), and I'm still impressed with how sharp it looks. I gave it to a son a few years ago and now have a stainless Sub and some others. If you want a touch of gold, I really like the gold with black dial and black bezel, though I prefer the jubilee over the PCL oyster.
The GMT in stainless with the PCL oyster does offer a bit more bling than the all brushed Sub look. Any of these versions offers the toughness and 50+ life of a Rolex. |
15 May 2012, 10:30 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
|
This forum is 90 percent SS owners so it is kind of biased. The best part of TT is that the bracelet provides more visual pleasure than the SS. Bad part is you have to be more careful because gold scratches easily.
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right |
15 May 2012, 10:35 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: TB
Location: West Coast
Posts: 339
|
IMO, TT seems more dressy while SS seems more versatile....dressed up or dressed down...
That being said, SS for the first gets my vote! BUT, as mentioned above, buy the one that makes you smile... Good luck! |
15 May 2012, 10:53 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
It's all a matter of what you prefer and I would also recommend you to try both but myself prefers TT.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
15 May 2012, 11:04 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
If you can afford a Rolex, you have the right to choose the one you like best.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
15 May 2012, 11:27 AM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Get what you prefer. I'm more a full gold or steel guy myself.
|
15 May 2012, 11:34 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Brian
Location: usa
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 688
|
Both are awesome. SS is classic and wears well with everything. TT looks great with quite a few things and attracts alot of attention.
|
15 May 2012, 03:33 PM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: Midwest
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 191
|
I personally love stainless steel or platinum...not a gold fan....BUT that TT blue Sub will likely be my next watch. However, I'd like to change that band to stainless if possible. It totally depends on your preferences.
|
16 May 2012, 02:53 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 2
|
Thanks guys..
just brought a half gold model for 58000 HKD:D |
16 May 2012, 02:56 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
Congrats....hope you enjoy it!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.