The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum
Reload this Page Tourbillon - "To Be" or "Not to be"
Register FAQ Calendar

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 23 May 2012, 08:28 AM   #1
SubmarinerMariner
"TRF" Member
 
SubmarinerMariner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Namor
Location: New York
Watch: 100-04-11-01-04
Posts: 841
Tourbillon - "To Be" or "Not to be"
What's the general consensus about the advantages of the "Tourbillon" on a watch and if it is worth the premium that is associated with watches that have this complication/mechanism?

What about the growing popularity of "Ebauche's" as potential "Tourbillon" replacements?

Is the whole "Tourbillon" craze a fad or a long term value adding renaissance in classical watchmaking?
SubmarinerMariner is offline   Reply With Quote
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
 This space is provided to horological resources.



Contact Us - The Rolex Forums - Archive - Top


Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.