Trouble Deciding on My First Rolex

[LouisVuittonKing]

Im 16 and Im Interested In Purchasing my First Rolex.
There are two Models That Im Interested In
1. http://www.rolex.com/en#/rolex-watch...l-m114060-0002
2. http://www.rolex.com/en#/rolex-watch...l-m116200-0070
Can somebody please tell me which watch they would recommend and if possible the prices.
Thank You

[cedargrove]

Two very different watches. If I were 16 I'd want the Sub.

[kilyung]

I wish I could have gotten a Rolex at 16. I'd vote Sub.

[Ticking Away]

I prefer the sub. You can pick one up on the for sale section of the forum for about $7600.

[Bigkev]

It depends on what you're looking for in the look, personally I like the Datejust, as it can be a dressier watch but can also be versatile

[LouisVuittonKing]

Thanks for your guys opinions :)

[Bangel]

Sub for me.

[KMdad44]

I had a Datejust and I really liked it, but a couple of years ago I saw a GMT and I never looked back. I purchased the GMT and I never gave the Datejust any wrist time. After A year of not wearing the Datejust I thought that it was a waste to have such a find watch sitting in a box so I decided to sell it. When I look at the GMT I know I made the right decision. The decision you are facing now is a similar one. If you are like me, you will like the datejust. However, with the Sub it will be at a totally new level of enjoyment.

My question is how does a 16 year old get to a position to own such a watch? Anyway, which ever way you go, enjoy.

[gregdolley]

I'd go with the datejust since, imho, it looks nicer. But it all depends on whether you want a watch that looks sexy, vs. a watch that looks rugged. If you want rugged, go for the sub, otherwise, go for the DJ.

[patrike]

Sub! :)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Feras]

Originally Posted by cedargrove

Two very different watches. If I were 16 I'd want the Sub.

x2, perfect watch imo. And you will be getting the newest version of a ND Sub

[Runnin' Rebel]

16=Sub

It's more sporty for you

[BNA/LION]

Get the Sub!

[MrLee]

Rolex at sixteen! Wow!

[wokafu]

SUB...for a 1st ..but 16 eh...u going to wear that among your friends that's wearing g-shocks..?

[SeaDweller50]

Originally Posted by kilyung

I wish I could have gotten a Rolex at 16. I'd vote Sub.

Yeh, me too.

[Rocco22]

Sub

[Lion]

Both are great watches but the Sub can go anywhere and do anything so my choice would be to get the Sub of your two options. But if it was me.....I would get an GMT!!!
Take it easy.....Leo

[mjclark32]

Really no wrong choice there. Try both on and see which is best for you

[travisb]

Sub!

[Sam Philip]

Why not consider a Sub with a date

[CoachRolexRyan]

Go with the Sub for sure. By the way, what took you so long to finally get a Rolex?
I got my first Rolex when I was 7. But hey, better late than never, right? (by the way, thats root beer in those mugs if anyone asks)

[ludicree]

How can a 16 year old even consider a Datejust over a Submariner? ;)

[SaddleSC]

Originally Posted by CoachRolexRyan

By the way, what took you so long to finally get a Rolex?
I got my first Rolex when I was 7. But hey, better late than never, right?

You waited until age 7? I bought my first SS Rolex at age 5, picked up a YG Day-Date at 7 and by the time I turned 9 had already moved on to Audemars and Patek:)

[CoachRolexRyan]

[eric23]

Sub!

[joe100]

Teens+Rolex? Not the best idea. Put the money in the bank and you will be $7k ahead on those student loans.


Sent from my  using Tapatalk

[Aspirin]

sub

[lsettle]

Neither at 16.

Lawrence

[joe100]

Totally agree with Lawrence


Sent from my  using Tapatalk