ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dlubix · 25 October 2012, 04:31 AM

Hi guys,
Would you trade your SD for Sub C ? I know that both are different and very good watch.

Which one do you prefer and why?

Here is my one

CDNWatchNut · 25 October 2012, 04:35 AM

I don't have a SD (I want one of course) however if I had one, there's no way I'd flip it for a Sub-C. I don't like the fat lug cases and ceramic bezels.

Solo118 · 25 October 2012, 04:37 AM

I don't think I would do it, and I am a Sub C owner.

Reason being, it is definitely unique and you do not see them that often. Also I assume the trade would involve adding cash out of your pocket.

If you were buying new, then I would say might as well go for the newest model. As for the trade, I would just keep my SD as it is a fantastic classic watch.

Frogman4me · 25 October 2012, 04:40 AM

No way! Far less seadwellers out there, we love that.

Glidelock · 25 October 2012, 04:40 AM

Having that, I would save up for a Hulk for a bit of verity!

Rolex74 · 25 October 2012, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glidelock

Having that, I would save up for a Hulk for a bit of verity!

I agree, I have a DSSD and if I were ot get another Rolex I would like to get the Hulk, or I like the GMT IIC, even though it looks like a Sub I love the didgits on the bezel.

Rocco22 · 25 October 2012, 05:34 AM

Yes I would trade it as I love the new sub c with all the improvements.

nauticajoe · 25 October 2012, 05:37 AM

No way!

katana · 25 October 2012, 05:41 AM

No and NO.......!!!!!!

Check · 25 October 2012, 05:46 AM

No!

R_Ongjoco · 25 October 2012, 05:50 AM

I love the SD a lot more compared to the SubC.

skip*17 · 25 October 2012, 06:36 AM

Never, the SD is a Legend, when you have one, hold it.....

the Sub C you can buy the next 20 years in this codition....

JGX · 25 October 2012, 06:45 AM

No

Kingair · 25 October 2012, 06:49 AM

N O

HAGOne

Onikage · 25 October 2012, 07:44 AM

No.

psv · 25 October 2012, 07:45 AM

I did because I thought it was a good move, but take it from me, don't do it!

The SD is a true classic and much more balanced and attractive.

Dr. Robert · 25 October 2012, 07:47 AM

Noooooooooooooo...........

kilyung · 25 October 2012, 08:15 AM

N... O...

Yoda · 25 October 2012, 08:44 AM

Nope.

Hairdude1 · 25 October 2012, 01:47 PM

I wouldn't

polarinda · 25 October 2012, 02:19 PM

Sub what?

sleddog · 25 October 2012, 02:23 PM

A conclusive and stern no from me also!

Chewbacca · 25 October 2012, 02:40 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MLry6Cn_D4

dlubix · 25 October 2012, 05:49 PM

Thanks for posting guys.
I really needed to hear it

Do not leave something what you love for something what you like. Old true.

Bad Lawyer · 25 October 2012, 06:03 PM

My answer is NO :)

Watchmutt · 25 October 2012, 06:22 PM

No.

Igerswis · 25 October 2012, 06:52 PM

I'm going to go against the grain and say yes. The Sub-C is a newer model that will have warranty and the glidelock is an amazing feature. Yes you can add glidelock to a SD but IMO it wouldn't feel right.

speedo · 25 October 2012, 08:01 PM

i wouldn't flip any rolex. save and buy the other one as well.

Bangel · 25 October 2012, 08:11 PM

Keep that Sea Dweller! It's a classic. If you want the sub c, then get it as an addition to your collection.

tarmyjay · 25 October 2012, 08:15 PM

No. I have both. The SD just has something about it. Definitely my favourtie Rolex

25 October 2012, 04:31 AM	#1
dlubix "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Marek Location: Czech Rep. Watch: OWG 14270 Posts: 228	Need your opinion... again :-) Hi guys, Would you trade your SD for Sub C ? I know that both are different and very good watch. Which one do you prefer and why? Here is my one Attached Images

25 October 2012, 05:41 AM	#9
katana "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Paradis Location: Sweden Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust Posts: 885	No and NO.......!!!!!! __________________

25 October 2012, 07:44 AM	#15
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	No. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

25 October 2012, 07:47 AM	#17
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,248	Noooooooooooooo........... __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

25 October 2012, 02:23 PM	#22
sleddog TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Rob Location: Nearby. Posts: 24,931	A conclusive and stern no from me also! __________________ He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..

25 October 2012, 04:35 AM	#2
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	I don't have a SD (I want one of course) however if I had one, there's no way I'd flip it for a Sub-C. I don't like the fat lug cases and ceramic bezels.

25 October 2012, 04:37 AM	#3
Solo118 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: USA Watch: Daytona Posts: 6,091	I don't think I would do it, and I am a Sub C owner. Reason being, it is definitely unique and you do not see them that often. Also I assume the trade would involve adding cash out of your pocket. If you were buying new, then I would say might as well go for the newest model. As for the trade, I would just keep my SD as it is a fantastic classic watch.

25 October 2012, 04:40 AM	#4
Frogman4me Banned Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Maryland Posts: 6,268	No way! Far less seadwellers out there, we love that.

25 October 2012, 04:40 AM	#5
Glidelock "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Real Name: Will Zdorf Location: So. Cal. Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC Posts: 1,947	Having that, I would save up for a Hulk for a bit of verity!

25 October 2012, 05:34 AM	#7
Rocco22 Banned Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Mass/Vegas/disney Watch: Hulk,114060,14060 Posts: 929	Yes I would trade it as I love the new sub c with all the improvements.

25 October 2012, 05:37 AM	#8
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	No way!

25 October 2012, 05:46 AM	#10
Check 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Matt Vera Location: So Cal Watch: Explorer (124270) Posts: 314	No!

25 October 2012, 05:50 AM	#11
R_Ongjoco "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Ron Location: BayArea/SanDiego Watch: AP Posts: 427	I love the SD a lot more compared to the SubC.

25 October 2012, 06:36 AM	#12
skip*17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Stefan Location: Germany Watch: Sub BiColor116613 Posts: 57	Never, the SD is a Legend, when you have one, hold it..... the Sub C you can buy the next 20 years in this codition....

25 October 2012, 06:45 AM	#13
JGX "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Jonathan Location: Wales, UK Posts: 789	No

25 October 2012, 06:49 AM	#14
Kingair "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA Watch: Not enough ;-) Posts: 21,232	N O HAGOne

25 October 2012, 07:45 AM	#16
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	I did because I thought it was a good move, but take it from me, don't do it! The SD is a true classic and much more balanced and attractive.

25 October 2012, 08:15 AM	#18
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	N... O...

25 October 2012, 08:44 AM	#19
Yoda Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: London Watch: PP AP RM Posts: 794	Nope.

25 October 2012, 01:47 PM	#20
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	I wouldn't

25 October 2012, 02:19 PM	#21
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	Sub what?

25 October 2012, 02:40 PM	#23
Chewbacca Banned Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: CJ Location: Kashyyyk Watch: Kessel Run Chrono Posts: 21,112	http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MLry6Cn_D4

25 October 2012, 05:49 PM	#24
dlubix "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Marek Location: Czech Rep. Watch: OWG 14270 Posts: 228	Thanks for posting guys. I really needed to hear it Do not leave something what you love for something what you like. Old true.

25 October 2012, 06:03 PM	#25
Bad Lawyer "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Thailand Watch: 116610 LN Posts: 33	My answer is NO :)

25 October 2012, 06:22 PM	#26
Watchmutt "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: 116600 Posts: 724	No.

25 October 2012, 06:52 PM	#27
Igerswis "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Liverpool, UK Posts: 185	I'm going to go against the grain and say yes. The Sub-C is a newer model that will have warranty and the glidelock is an amazing feature. Yes you can add glidelock to a SD but IMO it wouldn't feel right. __________________ Omega PO9300 / Speedie / DSOM Breitling Airwolf / Navitimer Rolex SD4000 / DSSD Raymond Weil Parsifal / Zenith El Primero Stratos Casio GWF-1000 / GW-1000 / MTG-S1030

25 October 2012, 08:01 PM	#28
speedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: bp, hu, eu Watch: dj 16234, 116610ln Posts: 2,376	i wouldn't flip any rolex. save and buy the other one as well. __________________ *16234 jubilee dial, 116610 ln, grand seiko sbgm221g, omega speedmaster mark II, longines legend diver, breguet 3910, nomos club campus 38, swatch sistem51, mares nemo, seiko ripley, g-shock rangeman* instagram: modus_horologicus

25 October 2012, 08:11 PM	#29
Bangel "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Australia Watch: 116610LN Posts: 15,802	Keep that Sea Dweller! It's a classic. If you want the sub c, then get it as an addition to your collection.

25 October 2012, 08:15 PM	#30
tarmyjay Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: London Posts: 47	No. I have both. The SD just has something about it. Definitely my favourtie Rolex

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)