ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tudor66 · 29 November 2012, 03:23 PM

I tried on this 2010 SuperOcean today. What an incredible watch. Though it says 42mm, it feels much smaller due to the dial size. The price is 2,300 dollars, as usual, I was tempted but did not pull the trigger.

I would like to hear some opinions from others on this watch...,

T-Rip · 29 November 2012, 03:48 PM

I love it. Looks great.

SLRdude · 6 December 2012, 01:49 AM

I always liked those but I prefer the 44 since it has a less cluttered dial.
Liking the 44 it's a bit unusual for me since I have a small wrist, but like you said... they do wear smaller.

Watchflair · 6 December 2012, 04:07 AM

I'm liking it alot! Seems like a good value at that price point.

Watchflair · 6 December 2012, 04:08 AM

Also like the subtilty of the blue ring on against the black dial and bezel.

Art 1 · 6 December 2012, 08:18 AM

I like it and IMO it's a good value.

servin34 · 6 December 2012, 08:51 AM

I love it, especially in blue. I have the 44mm chrono

[IMG]

[/IMG]

Genesis · 6 December 2012, 11:42 AM

I have one with the red ring....It's a nice watch, very well made....

MatthewInSeattle · 6 December 2012, 02:09 PM

Simple, solid, reliable watch, and a great price for the quality. Breitling has a more aggressive look than other lines in the same price point (TAG, OMEGA, BALL) but if you want something very sporty and relatively inexpensive, SO's are a great choice. My only, only hiccup, is the rubber bezel. I haven't seen any issues pop up on here recently with them, and they seem pretty sturdy, but it seems like it'd be something that'd eventually get ragged.

Watchmutt · 6 December 2012, 06:52 PM

I love my Superocean.

tourby · 6 December 2012, 10:48 PM

If you don't want it, I will buy it! Any of you want to part with your SO let me know. It is next on my list!

mrbill2mrbill2 · 7 December 2012, 10:49 AM

For $2,300 I say go for it. My only concern is the longevity of the rubber bezel.

Raucky · 19 December 2012, 10:14 AM

IMHO you need to go with the 44mm SO, it just looks better to me.

29 November 2012, 03:23 PM	#1
Tudor66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Al Location: California, USA Watch: GMT- Pepsi Posts: 3,462	SuperOcean Blue... I tried on this 2010 SuperOcean today. What an incredible watch. Though it says 42mm, it feels much smaller due to the dial size. The price is 2,300 dollars, as usual, I was tempted but did not pull the trigger. I would like to hear some opinions from others on this watch..., Attached Images __________________ -NAWCC Member

29 November 2012, 03:48 PM	#2
T-Rip "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Tom Location: Victorville CA Watch: Rolex DSSD 116660 Posts: 3,189	I love it. Looks great. __________________ T-Rip Formally known as Haydendillon Rolex: DSSD 116660, 16622 PLATTY

6 December 2012, 01:49 AM	#3
SLRdude "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Chip Location: Dallas TX Posts: 6,194	I always liked those but I prefer the 44 since it has a less cluttered dial. Liking the 44 it's a bit unusual for me since I have a small wrist, but like you said... they do wear smaller. __________________ Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try. Yoda, Jedi Master CHIP Member # 87

6 December 2012, 04:07 AM	#4
Watchflair 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Jim Location: Westchester NY Watch: Love em all Posts: 5,920	I'm liking it alot! Seems like a good value at that price point. __________________ Remember what matters. Value everyday

6 December 2012, 04:08 AM	#5
Watchflair 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Jim Location: Westchester NY Watch: Love em all Posts: 5,920	Also like the subtilty of the blue ring on against the black dial and bezel. __________________ Remember what matters. Value everyday

6 December 2012, 08:18 AM	#6
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	I like it and IMO it's a good value.

6 December 2012, 08:51 AM	#7
servin34 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Belgium Posts: 39	I love it, especially in blue. I have the 44mm chrono [IMG][/IMG]

6 December 2012, 11:42 AM	#8
Genesis Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Shawn Location: Fl Watch: AP Royal Oak Posts: 160	I have one with the red ring....It's a nice watch, very well made.... Attached Images

6 December 2012, 02:09 PM	#9
MatthewInSeattle Member Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: Matthew Location: Seattle Watch: Chronomat 44 Posts: 137	Simple, solid, reliable watch, and a great price for the quality. Breitling has a more aggressive look than other lines in the same price point (TAG, OMEGA, BALL) but if you want something very sporty and relatively inexpensive, SO's are a great choice. My only, only hiccup, is the rubber bezel. I haven't seen any issues pop up on here recently with them, and they seem pretty sturdy, but it seems like it'd be something that'd eventually get ragged.

6 December 2012, 06:52 PM	#10
Watchmutt "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Bay Area, CA Watch: 116600 Posts: 724	I love my Superocean.

6 December 2012, 10:48 PM	#11
tourby "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: wisconsin Posts: 6	If you don't want it, I will buy it! Any of you want to part with your SO let me know. It is next on my list!

7 December 2012, 10:49 AM	#12
mrbill2mrbill2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Mr. Bill Location: South Florida Watch: 16610 Posts: 6,148	For $2,300 I say go for it. My only concern is the longevity of the rubber bezel. __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13

19 December 2012, 10:14 AM	#13
Raucky "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: Jim Location: Ohio Watch: Milgauss Wht V Posts: 204	IMHO you need to go with the 44mm SO, it just looks better to me. __________________ Milgauss Wht V

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)