Oh Man, I feel bad

[Armyguy03]

Read the description, I dont know who would buy this.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-SUBMAR...30845911117%26

[MitchCut1]

Right, so she took pictures of the watch but then got a picture off the internet for the box? Just me or is that strange?

[alexthegreat123]

Hilarious...especially for christmas gift..

[Knappo 1307]

Tmi

[MonBK]

Looks like a killer watch, oops my bad.

[MitchCut1]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Looks like a killer watch, oops my bad.

[689maple]

Too much of that karma stuff says my hero Earl Hickey.

[Armyguy03]

Seriously, I wouldn't touch this with a ten foot pole. She might as well just keep it. This is really, really sad.

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by Armyguy03

Seriously, I wouldn't touch this with a ten foot pole. She might as well just keep it. This is really, really sad.

I wouldn't believe everything I read on E-bay.

[linesiders]

The time telling rein-reincarnation of Christine

[crowncollection]

hmmm interesting listing technique.

[Armyguy03]

Originally Posted by MonBK

I wouldn't believe everything I read on E-bay.

It is said that Ab Lincoln said not to believe everything posted on the internet. But I just dont see how this would "prompt" someone to buy this watch.

[financeman]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Looks like a killer watch, oops my bad.

Now that was funny.

[Rootbeer]

I checked out her other items but was afraid to click on the scooby doo hat just in case it was all " this was my fiance's favourite hat. He wore it maybe 3 times tops and only on special occasions...'

[threemonkeys]

At least she didn't say he was wearing it when he met his demise. 'Cause that might be a deal-breaker for some folks.

Just saying.

[Armyguy03]

Originally Posted by threemonkeys

At least she didn't say he was wearing it when he met his demise. 'Cause that might be a deal-breaker for some folks.

Just saying.

I dunno, this is a deal breaker right now, on him or not. This should just stay in the family, or not disclose what happened to the owner. Sheesh!

[bimmerboy]

To me the watch looks good awkward way of selling an item could of left out all the depressing stuff though

[bscepter]

$5995 in 2007? my 16110 was $6k new in 2011.

[kooltzar]

Very strange! She knows she would have to take off the band to see the serial, so the listor knows about Rolex watches, but let the papers go.

By the way: In 2007 (when she claims to have bought the watch) there were no SWISS only dials produced anymore!

[mrbill2mrbill2]

I could be wrong. But I reall SWISS returning in 1998 not 1997.

[kooltzar]

Originally Posted by mrbill2mrbill2

I could be wrong. But I reall SWISS returning in 1998 not 1997.

???
All I said was that in 2007 there were no Swiss dials anymore, there were 1997, I never contested that.

[kooltzar]

In fact I also saw a T series having a Swiss only dial.

[JohnBoy]

Originally Posted by kooltzar

Very strange! She knows she would have to take off the band to see the serial, so the listor knows about Rolex watches, but let the papers go.

By the way: In 2007 (when she claims to have bought the watch) there were no SWISS only dials produced anymore!

Hmmm...well, she didn't say she bought it new in 2007. She only reports that its 'like new,' and that she bought it in 2007, paying $5,9xx for it. Further, closing out what remains a deceased person's property is always tough for the survivor(s) - its impossible to keep track of all details (especially something as small as the papers for a watch). However, the report of lost, or missing, papers and no information on its SN do make one wonder as to its authenticity. Not everyone has as much appreciation for these matters as a WIS.....