ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 January 2013, 12:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 131
|
circa 1969 1675 GMT movement question
Did any of the yr. 1969 GMT 1675's come with a 1560 movement?
|
31 January 2013, 01:25 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Rolex switched to the 1575 in 1965 so it's very very unlikely.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
31 January 2013, 08:00 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
'1570' (1575 is with the date function, but they all just say 1570, as with the 1680 subs and 1665 SDs)
|
31 January 2013, 10:58 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Zürich
Watch: Submariner 5512
Posts: 922
|
1969: 1570 non hacking movement for sure.
|
4 February 2013, 04:18 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
|
4 February 2013, 08:55 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Quote:
I'd like to see that - got any photos? What do you mean by the above statement - that ALL GMTs had 1575 on the bridge, or just 'some' ? If they are marked 1575 on the bridge, why is it hard to find? I have not seen the movement of my 1966 1675 GMT, which was fully overhauled by RSC UK in 2011. I just assumed it was likely marked 1570, as per my 1970 1680 RED SUB, which I have seen inside (photo attached, by Eric Ku). |
|
5 February 2013, 03:21 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 813
|
You're right. For some reason, I thought 1575gmt was marked differently, but it looks like they use the same 8109 bridge as cal 1570.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.