ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

chili90 · 1 February 2013, 05:35 AM

Hey guys,

I'm going to visit a local AD to try on the new Sub-Cs in my hunt for my first Rolex/"nice" watch.

But with the relatively larger maxi case, are the Sub-Cs noticeably larger than their non-ceramic counterparts? I've tried on the old 16610s and thought they were just the right size for my 6.5 inch wrist, does that mean I can expect the 116610 to be a good size for the wrist too or would it be too big?

Thanks!

(sorry I meant "bigger than 14060" in my title)

1 February 2013, 05:35 AM	#1
chili90 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Plano, TX Watch: Explorer 1 Posts: 60	Sub-Cs noticeably bigger than 16610/114060? Hey guys, I'm going to visit a local AD to try on the new Sub-Cs in my hunt for my first Rolex/"nice" watch. But with the relatively larger maxi case, are the Sub-Cs noticeably larger than their non-ceramic counterparts? I've tried on the old 16610s and thought they were just the right size for my 6.5 inch wrist, does that mean I can expect the 116610 to be a good size for the wrist too or would it be too big? Thanks! (sorry I meant "bigger than 14060" in my title) Last edited by chili90; 1 February 2013 at 05:40 AM.. Reason: typo

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)