ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 February 2013, 10:10 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denmark
Posts: 90
|
16613 Blue upgrade to 116613 LB experience?
Hi all,
There seems to be a preference of the old 16613 blue nuances and 'sparkle' when compared to the newer 116613LB. Just wondering if anyone actually upgraded their 16613 to the ceramic version - and either are happy with their decision or perhaps regretted and 'downgraded' again? Very interested in hearing experiences, good or bad, with this...or anything related to the TT Subs really ;) Thanks, M |
13 February 2013, 11:29 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
For what its worth I prefer the old cobalt blue dial. The new shade of blue simply does not appeal to me. Obviously just my opinion.
|
13 February 2013, 11:32 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
I'm going to get a 16613 LB long before I get a 116613 LB.
|
13 February 2013, 11:35 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Joe
Location: NJ
Watch: 16613ln
Posts: 627
|
My brothere just traded his s serial for the new lb and he loves it. The older model blue is more elegant than the new blue which seems more matte and sportier.
|
14 February 2013, 10:16 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,149
|
I've had both and much prefer my new LB C. The solid links and glide lock clasp are fantastic! As far as the color goes, I can't tell a major difference. In fact, I went into an AD the other day and the lady working there thought it was the old blue model until i pointed out the larger lugs. For what it's worth, mine is a random serial. Some have speculated that the newer LBC models have a darker blue dial.
|
14 February 2013, 11:03 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
14 February 2013, 11:09 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
|
The feel of the watch is very different.
Go try one on and see if you like it. The protruding crown may take some getting used to on the LB. |
14 February 2013, 12:13 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Michigan
Watch: DD 228238
Posts: 2,460
|
I don't care for the new blue on the ceramic. Love the old blue.
|
14 February 2013, 01:23 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: ing You Sleep
Posts: 379
|
Love my old 16613 over the newer model. I would never sell it for one of those models though I would like to add one to the collection at some point.
|
14 February 2013, 04:00 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,775
|
I went from the old to new style and have never looked back. I was reluctant at first, but the maxi dial and solid bracelet/clasp pushed me to the new style, and I have no regrets!!!
__________________
nch209 |
14 February 2013, 06:21 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
The old ones just look OLD to me.
|
14 February 2013, 07:41 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
I don't own either at the moment, but the new LB-C would be my choice.
I'll take the new case, clasp, bezel etc every time. |
14 February 2013, 07:44 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: No Clue
Posts: 586
|
|
14 February 2013, 07:49 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Well apart from the cosmetic changes they are still basically the same watch,yes the clasp is perhaps a improvement,but myself much prefer the 16613.The new type case is still rated the same W/R and ceramic bezel insert functions the same as the old one, so no real improvement there, perhaps a bit more bling if you are in to that.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
15 February 2013, 01:22 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
|
I've had both, they are beautiful watches but my vote would go with the 116613 because of the bigger case and band. Good luck.
|
15 February 2013, 01:24 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Case is the same size its just the lugs that look bigger.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
17 March 2013, 12:08 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
|
Old blue all the way. Had bought the new blue and sold it. Don't care for it....too dull in my opinion.
|
17 March 2013, 08:30 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: England
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 643
|
I would just get the 16613. Really don't like the blue on the 116613.
|
17 March 2013, 08:35 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
Love the updates on the new; however, the color just isn't as magical as the old blue. The old was mesmerizing.
|
17 March 2013, 08:58 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 157
|
It is not an "upgrade."
|
17 March 2013, 09:12 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 78
|
another 16613 thumbs up from me! the 116613 just looks a bit clumbsy and nowhere near as refined as the 16613!
|
17 March 2013, 09:45 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
I have the 116613LB but not the 16613. If I have to choose again I would stlll choose the 116613LB. Same choice between 116610LN and 16610, I guess I just like the newer design and features.
|
17 March 2013, 10:07 PM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
I also like the old blue better. When I had mine it was the color of the ocean in the sun !
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.