The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 March 2013, 07:38 AM   #1
dogguru
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NY
Watch: Rolex ref#4313
Posts: 27
Supreme court rules in favor of comsumers!!!

This will make world wide pricing very interesting . It should also lower prices and make more parts available .


http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...239_story.html
dogguru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2013, 04:26 PM   #2
Grissom
"TRF" Member
 
Grissom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
Seemingly quite an important ruling.....

Appears that this would now allow folks like Costco to purchase luxury watches outside the US, and legally resell them in the US, and would appear to overturn/negate the Omega/Costco ruling making such importation and sale illegal, which also related to copyright infringement, from this type of importation. This ruling thus validates the "first sale" rule, as it specifically relates to good produced overseas for sale overseas.

The court was essentially reviewing five words in the federal Copyright Act: “lawfully made under this title.” Some lower courts and the Obama administration said that did not cover goods made abroad.

But Breyer said a careful reading of the law did not show that geography mattered. He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976)
116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) +
116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil)

Who else needs an Intervention?
(109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5

RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend
Grissom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 March 2013, 06:10 PM   #3
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
So does this void Rolex's exclusive right to import Rolex watches into the US?
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 03:14 AM   #4
Dr.Brian
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr.Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
I'm not sure if copyright law and trademark protection are the same thing with regard to this ruling.
Any knowledgeable attorneys want to weigh in?
__________________
-Brian
AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT

十人十色
Dr.Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 04:13 AM   #5
Frosty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Frosty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
Cool!
Frosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 06:36 AM   #6
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
OP: Welcome to TRF! - and thanks for something new to ponder...

This ruling is very narrow - not a general reinterpretation of commercial import rules. The "first sale" doesn't take place when importing goods - a distributor acts as a channel for the manufacturer rather than an "owner".

I think this holds up for private sales to end users and their subsequent ability to transfer the item to a 3rd party.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 07:32 AM   #7
mikkibarry
"TRF" Member
 
mikkibarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Mikki
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,146
Well now this is quite interesting. Wiley, as a publisher, used the Copyright Act as an argument, and the Court found, if this story is correct, based on the exact wording of the Copyright Act. Trademark law, is governed by the Lanham Act. Since the Court used the language of the law rather than a broad prohibition against restricting importation of goods not protected by copyright, but protected instead by patent or trademark law, I wouldn't get my hopes up just yet that this will be of any use for purchasing Rolexes overseas. Now I'm saying this without reading the entire opinion (which frankly, after an 80 hour week of reading other legal stuff, I'm just too tired to deal with).

However, since the "first sale" doctrine was upheld, I would argue that if I purchase an item overseas, once that money changes hands, the item is now my property. It was sold to me. As lawful owner of the item, I should be able to import it for my own use, without any type of restriction whatsoever. If Rolex USA wants to keep out pallets of stuff, that's a different argument, as those items are going into the "stream of commerce."
__________________
No Matter Where You Go - There You Are
(and so's your Rolex)
Card Carrying Chinese Crested Owner
mikkibarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 07:33 AM   #8
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Welcome to TRF!

Interesting.

Cannot wait to see how this ruling pans out.

Seems like a pre-purchased Rolex from outside the USA can be shipped to the USA.

__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13
mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2013, 08:30 AM   #9
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikkibarry View Post

However, since the "first sale" doctrine was upheld, I would argue that if I purchase an item overseas, once that money changes hands, the item is now my property. It was sold to me. As lawful owner of the item, I should be able to import it for my own use, without any type of restriction whatsoever. If Rolex USA wants to keep out pallets of stuff, that's a different argument, as those items are going into the "stream of commerce."
Agree with you

US Customs is upholding the Rolex trademark recordation with regards to "Import of Goods Bearing Genuine Trademarks or Restricted Trade Names". A private individual can hand carry one Rolex watch from a trip overseas without obtaining Rolex USA permission. But more than one, or ship into US and they will all be seized.

Commercial activity is different as you noted...
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2013, 10:43 PM   #10
Passionata
"TRF" Member
 
Passionata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
some more news upon this topic
http://www.therecycler.com/posts/imp...%20some%20time
__________________
Best
George

"Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston
---------------------
*new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new *

http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ
IG @passionata1
Passionata is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2013, 11:27 PM   #11
mikkibarry
"TRF" Member
 
mikkibarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Mikki
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Passionata View Post
Yet another intellectual property protection scheme comes into play. Patent law is governed by another portion of the Lanham Act, and there are specific instances where goods that infringe on a US patent can be denied entry into the US. This is not the protection scheme that Rolex uses, however. Rolex's ability to keep products from coming into the US is based on trademark law.
__________________
No Matter Where You Go - There You Are
(and so's your Rolex)
Card Carrying Chinese Crested Owner
mikkibarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 April 2013, 02:09 AM   #12
dogguru
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NY
Watch: Rolex ref#4313
Posts: 27
I think this will bring about a new category " used /never worn".
dogguru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.