ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 March 2013, 07:38 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NY
Watch: Rolex ref#4313
Posts: 27
|
Supreme court rules in favor of comsumers!!!
This will make world wide pricing very interesting . It should also lower prices and make more parts available .
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...239_story.html |
22 March 2013, 04:26 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
|
Seemingly quite an important ruling.....
Appears that this would now allow folks like Costco to purchase luxury watches outside the US, and legally resell them in the US, and would appear to overturn/negate the Omega/Costco ruling making such importation and sale illegal, which also related to copyright infringement, from this type of importation. This ruling thus validates the "first sale" rule, as it specifically relates to good produced overseas for sale overseas.
The court was essentially reviewing five words in the federal Copyright Act: “lawfully made under this title.” Some lower courts and the Obama administration said that did not cover goods made abroad. But Breyer said a careful reading of the law did not show that geography mattered. He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976) 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend |
22 March 2013, 06:10 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
So does this void Rolex's exclusive right to import Rolex watches into the US?
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
23 March 2013, 03:14 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
I'm not sure if copyright law and trademark protection are the same thing with regard to this ruling.
Any knowledgeable attorneys want to weigh in?
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
23 March 2013, 04:13 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
|
Cool!
|
23 March 2013, 06:36 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
OP: Welcome to TRF! - and thanks for something new to ponder...
This ruling is very narrow - not a general reinterpretation of commercial import rules. The "first sale" doesn't take place when importing goods - a distributor acts as a channel for the manufacturer rather than an "owner". I think this holds up for private sales to end users and their subsequent ability to transfer the item to a 3rd party.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
23 March 2013, 07:32 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Mikki
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,146
|
Well now this is quite interesting. Wiley, as a publisher, used the Copyright Act as an argument, and the Court found, if this story is correct, based on the exact wording of the Copyright Act. Trademark law, is governed by the Lanham Act. Since the Court used the language of the law rather than a broad prohibition against restricting importation of goods not protected by copyright, but protected instead by patent or trademark law, I wouldn't get my hopes up just yet that this will be of any use for purchasing Rolexes overseas. Now I'm saying this without reading the entire opinion (which frankly, after an 80 hour week of reading other legal stuff, I'm just too tired to deal with).
However, since the "first sale" doctrine was upheld, I would argue that if I purchase an item overseas, once that money changes hands, the item is now my property. It was sold to me. As lawful owner of the item, I should be able to import it for my own use, without any type of restriction whatsoever. If Rolex USA wants to keep out pallets of stuff, that's a different argument, as those items are going into the "stream of commerce."
__________________
No Matter Where You Go - There You Are
(and so's your Rolex) Card Carrying Chinese Crested Owner |
23 March 2013, 07:33 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Welcome to TRF!
Interesting. Cannot wait to see how this ruling pans out. Seems like a pre-purchased Rolex from outside the USA can be shipped to the USA.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
23 March 2013, 08:30 AM | #9 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,017
|
Quote:
US Customs is upholding the Rolex trademark recordation with regards to "Import of Goods Bearing Genuine Trademarks or Restricted Trade Names". A private individual can hand carry one Rolex watch from a trip overseas without obtaining Rolex USA permission. But more than one, or ship into US and they will all be seized. Commercial activity is different as you noted...
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
26 March 2013, 10:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: the girls
Posts: 7,095
|
some more news upon this topic
http://www.therecycler.com/posts/imp...%20some%20time
__________________
Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- *new*https://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE *new * http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1 |
26 March 2013, 11:27 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Mikki
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: Your Six
Posts: 1,146
|
Quote:
__________________
No Matter Where You Go - There You Are
(and so's your Rolex) Card Carrying Chinese Crested Owner |
|
13 April 2013, 02:09 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NY
Watch: Rolex ref#4313
Posts: 27
|
I think this will bring about a new category " used /never worn".
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.