The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 March 2013, 07:41 PM   #1
shst
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5
Icon7 Differences between the Royal Oak 15300 models?

Hi

Can anyone help me on the different Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300 models?

- What is the "ST" (15300ST) standing for, and what differs a "Jumbo" model? aren't these 39mm as well?
- When did AP start to use the "silver" dial instead of the milk-white one?
- Are there different kinds of the navy blue colours as well? (Like there are different white/silvers)
- Should I go for some of the models newer than year xx? (Like some Rolex where the series changes from a specific year etc.)

Thanks
shst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2013, 10:24 PM   #2
montres1
"TRF" Member
 
montres1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Fake surname
Location: matters
Watch: me goin' bonkers
Posts: 295
15300 is now discontinued model, successor is 15400 with its 41mm and 15450 with 37mm
- ST stands for steel, jumbo model is 15202 also 39mm sans central second hand, quickset date and it has different calibre 2121 instead 3120 which 15300/15400 have
montres1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 12:28 AM   #3
shst
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5
Thank you, so there is actually no 15300 Jumbo model? Jumbo refers to the 15202 only?
shst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 01:45 AM   #4
cdnyc
"TRF" Member
 
cdnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Cory
Location: NY
Posts: 681
yes. jumbo is also thinner and lighter. most feel it's a little less sporty.
cdnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 01:48 AM   #5
montres1
"TRF" Member
 
montres1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Fake surname
Location: matters
Watch: me goin' bonkers
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by shst View Post
Thank you, so there is actually no 15300 Jumbo model? Jumbo refers to the 15202 only?
yes reference 15202,14202,25402 and original jumbo ref 5402 which was introduced in '72, due to its larger size for that time got nickname jumbo
montres1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 02:09 AM   #6
Stonedcl
"TRF" Member
 
Stonedcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Nj
Watch: 116200, 116610
Posts: 1,191
It is funny that back in the 70's, 80's and 90's that 39MM was considered a JUMBO where now people consider a 39mm a small watch. The AP's do wear larger then most watches because I have a sub-C and it fits fine but the 26300 which is 39mm looks a little big on my 6.5 wrist..
Stonedcl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 05:33 PM   #7
shst
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5
Thanks for your replies.

Is there a difference between the navy dials on the 15300 as well?
shst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 April 2013, 11:17 PM   #8
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
The navy on the 300 and 400 Im sure is the same colour as is the white dial which can look silvery in certain light and angle. Only one navy, black and white colour.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2013, 01:02 PM   #9
dannyjak
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 194
Quote:
Originally Posted by AK797 View Post
The navy on the 300 and 400 Im sure is the same colour as is the white dial which can look silvery in certain light and angle. Only one navy, black and white colour.
Can anyone confirm whether they are the same blue?
dannyjak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2013, 02:30 AM   #10
cdnyc
"TRF" Member
 
cdnyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Cory
Location: NY
Posts: 681
I've always thought the blue of the 15400 seemed a little lighter and a little bluer, whereas the 15300 seems a little darker and perhaps has a tad more gray/green in it. But don't know if this is officially the case. You may want to call a boutique and ask them.
cdnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2013, 02:53 AM   #11
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
15202 also has a better decorated rotor than the 15300 and the 15400.

I think the smaller ROs (36, 37mm) have closed casebacks.
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2013, 02:20 AM   #12
ec00421
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by shnxx View Post
15202 also has a better decorated rotor than the 15300 and the 15400.

I think the smaller ROs (36, 37mm) have closed casebacks.
I disagree. Though I've owned both 15202 and 15400, I think 3120 movement is way sexier...
ec00421 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2013, 10:33 PM   #13
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyjak View Post
Can anyone confirm whether they are the same blue?
Spoke to Sunil at Marcus and he said the blue on the 400 is slightly darker.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.