ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
11 April 2013, 11:59 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 51
|
Have opportunity to buy
Hi TRF,
I have tried on these two watches 16610LV and seadweller both M serials. I just cant make up my mind. I orginally thought of purchasing the 39mm explorer but not after I put tried on these two bad boys. Help which one should I go with. The dealer said both should hold thier value and rise...not sure if that was strategy to push either sale. Your thoughts PLEASE |
12 April 2013, 12:02 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
12 April 2013, 12:04 AM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Tucson, Az
Watch: Rolex 1501
Posts: 13,883
|
Since you've already had them both on, then you already know the answer.
Search your feelings.
__________________
Ain't much of a crime, whacking a surly bartender |
12 April 2013, 12:11 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
|
i like the color green, so, i'm partial to the LV. plus, you can switch between green and black bezel inserts, which is nice.
but, the SD is such a tool watch icon in the range. ideally, i'd have an SD and an LVc. |
12 April 2013, 12:11 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
i'd go with the Sea Dweller personally...but as stated, get what YOU like
|
12 April 2013, 12:12 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
SD
|
12 April 2013, 12:27 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
|
Exactly trouble today Rolex are no longer watches they are seen as little more by some as just $$$$$££££.Myself always buy whatever watch I want its not governed by if this or that will go up or down a Rolex is for a life time of wearing.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
12 April 2013, 03:18 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: usa
Posts: 51
|
Guys...I was just stating what the dealer said about value. I like them equally the same just wanted some take from fellow members who might had the same dilmea. Thanks Guys
|
12 April 2013, 03:20 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
I'd get the LV, love the maxi dial.
__________________
|
12 April 2013, 03:29 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
I picked up an 16610 LV last April. It's been my daily until February of this year when I aquired a SD 16600, which is all I wear now.
I still love the LV but can't take the SD off for it. Pick the one that makes you smile the most, can't go wrong either way imo. |
12 April 2013, 03:49 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: london
Posts: 842
|
SD...........
|
12 April 2013, 04:08 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
|
Here's yet another opinion......
They are both iconic watches, both now discontinued models. I own one of each, as I liked them equally well, and if you can swing it, buying both might be the way to go. While I certainly agree that one good philosophy is to buy what you like and what works best for you, at the price point you can afford, I also believe, all else being equal, in buying what may yield me the best return for my dollar spent, should I need to, or decide to, sell in the future. While none of us has a crystal ball, we can look to the past and along with whatever current trends we see now, attempt an educated guess as to which option might give you the most favorable exit strategy in the future. For my money, if I liked then equally well, I would buy the LV now (first?) and look to acquire the SD next, unless one was priced so much more attractively than the other. I think given the "collector nature" of people, the LV may from a psychological perspective, increase in "value" faster/more (decrease in value slower/less) than the Sea Dweller, although I believe both will both hold their value well. And, as with most every purchase, you "make your money" (if and when you want or have to sell, in the future) on the "buy" so what one pays becomes a critical part of the equation!
Good luck with your decision making process!
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976) 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend |
12 April 2013, 04:09 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
|
Go for the LV.
The first Rolex I bought was the SD but I found it too thick and unbalanced feeling on my wrist. I ended up with the 16610 (this was in 1999). When that watch was stolen last year in 2012... I decided to replace it with the 1610LV. I love the watch since it's like the classic 16610 but with a twist of color that sets it apart in a room full of black subs!
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
12 April 2013, 04:37 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,848
|
I think both are very nice and both will hold their value. I would go with a sea dweller though. I don't know if I would always want the green bezel on the sub. It's a personal choice though so if you are leaning towards one then go for it
__________________
afc1 Watch Collection: Rolex and AP |
12 April 2013, 05:34 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,234
|
LV gets my vote.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
12 April 2013, 10:06 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Buy SD
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.