ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

teerapon · 5 June 2013, 10:24 AM

Which one will u suggest between pam 104 & 392?
My wrist is about 7" and need a dressy look.

nauticajoe · 5 June 2013, 10:32 AM

Neither. I'd shoot for a 312 instead. It'll look good on a 7" wrist.

Happy hunting!

toulouse · 5 June 2013, 10:42 AM

Between those two, I'd go with the 392. Though like Joe suggested, maybe look at the 312. It's 44mm. Definitely not too big for your 7'' wrist. But if you like that same look but want it a little smaller, then the 392 might be the way to go. I prefer the date without the cyclops (reason why I'd prefer it over the 104) though it's not a deal breaker all together.

apeogre · 5 June 2013, 10:52 AM

Between those two, 392.

kilyung · 5 June 2013, 11:01 AM

I'd get a 312.

mws222 · 5 June 2013, 01:06 PM

392 for me!

TAKUYA · 5 June 2013, 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teerapon

Which one will u suggest between pam 104 & 392?
My wrist is about 7" and need a dressy look.

Forget about those models. Get the Rads 47mm or 45mm instead

Cru Jones · 5 June 2013, 03:10 PM

104 will wear a little smaller (thinner) and is fully polished, so, for a dressy look between only those two, the 104.

echau · 5 June 2013, 10:58 PM

If you're going dressy, rads are the way to go. I'd suggest a 45mm rad...wears smaller than a 44mm luminor and has a better chance of fitting under your shirt cuff.

Travelller · 5 June 2013, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nauticajoe

Neither. I'd shoot for a 312 instead. It'll look good on a 7" wrist.

Listen to this man

HRFdez · 5 June 2013, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

104 will wear a little smaller (thinner) and is fully polished, so, for a dressy look between only those two, the 104.

+1

teerapon · 6 June 2013, 01:33 AM

Thanks to you guys. �� I ll take a look over 312, 392 & 104 again.
But almost gear to 104.

HRFdez · 6 June 2013, 02:14 AM

I had a 104, but moved to a 112. The face on the 104 was a bit too busy for my taste. Having said that, it is a nice watch.

5 June 2013, 10:24 AM	#1
teerapon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Thailand Watch: MM300, Pam104 Posts: 2	Need suggestion for new comer Which one will u suggest between pam 104 & 392? My wrist is about 7" and need a dressy look.

5 June 2013, 10:32 AM	#2
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Neither. I'd shoot for a 312 instead. It'll look good on a 7" wrist. Happy hunting!

5 June 2013, 10:42 AM	#3
toulouse Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Real Name: Tony Location: USA Watch: 210, GMT2C Posts: 499	Between those two, I'd go with the 392. Though like Joe suggested, maybe look at the 312. It's 44mm. Definitely not too big for your 7'' wrist. But if you like that same look but want it a little smaller, then the 392 might be the way to go. I prefer the date without the cyclops (reason why I'd prefer it over the 104) though it's not a deal breaker all together.

5 June 2013, 10:52 AM	#4
apeogre "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: No Clue Posts: 586	Between those two, 392.

5 June 2013, 11:01 AM	#5
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	I'd get a 312.

5 June 2013, 01:06 PM	#6
mws222 Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Nowhere Posts: 2,103	392 for me!

5 June 2013, 03:10 PM	#8
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,297	104 will wear a little smaller (thinner) and is fully polished, so, for a dressy look between only those two, the 104.

5 June 2013, 10:58 PM	#9
echau "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Houston, TX Posts: 350	If you're going dressy, rads are the way to go. I'd suggest a 45mm rad...wears smaller than a 44mm luminor and has a better chance of fitting under your shirt cuff.

6 June 2013, 01:33 AM	#12
teerapon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Thailand Watch: MM300, Pam104 Posts: 2	Thanks to you guys. �� I ll take a look over 312, 392 & 104 again. But almost gear to 104.

6 June 2013, 02:14 AM	#13
HRFdez "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Hector Location: Lake Placid, NY Watch: Rolex Day-Date Posts: 390	I had a 104, but moved to a 112. The face on the 104 was a bit too busy for my taste. Having said that, it is a nice watch.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)