ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
17 June 2013, 11:28 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
Thoughts on this 5512 please.
Friend of mine popped round this morning and asked me if I was interested in the following.
Serial is 869XXX / 1560 movement / case back reads V.62 Would appreciate any comments. Cheers, Paul. |
18 June 2013, 12:51 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
A pointed crown guard, 5512, doesn't come around too often. It appears to wear the original bracelet and the dial looks very nice. It has had some case work in the past which includes some buffing /polishing which is normal for most vintage watches. It appears that the bottom right lug had the chamfer worked over a little aggressively as the chamfer has now been angled into the pin hole. The bezel insert appears to be a later, Rolex replacement insert but this would not be uncommon for a 50-year-old watch.
It could be a nice score if the price is right.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
18 June 2013, 01:12 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
He's asking around GBP6K (USD9.5k), but he's no expert. I'm not sure if this is fair or not. Regardless, I'm more interested if the watch looks okay first. The pictures don't do it much justice and it was hard to get clear lit images without reflections in the dome.
I must admit, it looks stunning in the flesh. I'll have to do some research, I've no idea what kind of price these are. I'm usually a 1655, 1665, 1675 & 1680 person. 55XX's aren't my forte, hence my post. |
18 June 2013, 02:40 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
I think that's a good price for that - great dial, pcg...
|
18 June 2013, 01:36 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Pete
Location: Base Camp
Posts: 628
|
Spot on mate.
The watch is 50yrs old guys. It' won't be perfect and the price reflects it.
__________________
Take care Pete |
18 June 2013, 02:59 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
I've had a dig around, found this recently posted on VRF.....
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...ring+5512+1962 His case looks much sharper but the dials look identical. Problem is the one on VRF is four times the price I'm being offered, which is a big problem. A morale problem. Bugger. |
18 June 2013, 03:23 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Jersey
Watch: Rolex 6202
Posts: 19
|
It certainly seems like a good example for the price. However, only you can determine whether the over polishing and later bezel matter. Personally, whenever I look at a piece that has uneven lugs, I know I will be staring at them all the time wishing I had a fatter case. If you are not that person, I'd say go for it.
|
18 June 2013, 05:58 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,000
|
Uneven lugs .....
[QUOTE=AdamNJ;4216699] ...... whenever I look at a piece that has uneven lugs, I know I will be staring at them all the time wishing I had a fatter case .......QUOTE]
I'm with Adam. I can live with polished lugs - par for the course with old watches - but uneven lugs really bug me. I have an old 5513 afflicted with 'skinny lug' (only one lug) and that flaw catches my eye every time I look at it. All in all though, I watch the PCG prices and think circa US $9.5 sounds kinda fair for the watch you are considering. Some added value in that simple dot at 6:00pm too |
18 June 2013, 05:19 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
the dial is everything on this one, I think. ! mark ! 4 lines, 'Swiss' - only gilt/silver...
|
18 June 2013, 05:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,133
|
No expert but dial is very good imho. Case is nice as well. I don't think this is a GBP 6k watch. Make it a multiple I'm afraid.
|
18 June 2013, 06:54 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Patrick
Location: Omaha
Watch: 16610 Submariner
Posts: 948
|
that dial is awesome. the price sounds pretty fair.
__________________
2009 16610 Submariner Date 1971 1601 Datejust 1966 Omega Seamaster 1965 Vulcain Voyager Chronograph |
18 June 2013, 07:49 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: mel(oz)/Yorks(uk)
Posts: 1,929
|
very very underpriced....moral crisis indeed. watches with a dial that pretty could easily do 3-4x that retail.
great watch and value is all about the dial. pretend for a moment it had a service dial in ....without the dial its a £3k thing on ebay all day long ..... if it had a better stronger unpolished case its maybe a £4k thing. arguing about the niggles of a case on a watch like that priced at £6k is like two fleas arguing which one of them owns the dog they live on. |
18 June 2013, 09:26 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
The price is very reasonable for the watch with everything considered - very reasonable.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
18 June 2013, 07:52 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Home!
Posts: 1,259
|
If the dial is genuine it is very far below market price. Should be at least 15k gbp.
The dial looks almost too good though. I'd want it checked out by an expert. All the money o these is in the dial, if a redone dial then it's around fair price. |
18 June 2013, 08:30 AM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
Quote:
I have to tell him it could be worth more. I'll probably still have a punt on it given the feedback. Cheers guys. |
|
18 June 2013, 10:09 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Watch: The Throne
Posts: 375
|
I would purchase the piece before he does more research
|
18 June 2013, 11:09 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Seems like a good deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
18 June 2013, 01:20 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
Wow that is a stunning watch! The price is even crazier, if you don't take it please refer it to me I will gladly take it off your hands.
|
18 June 2013, 03:43 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: sacramento
Posts: 18
|
Put my name on the list behind Frogman, I've been wanting one of these 4 liner 5512s forever! Forget the case look at that dial...
|
19 June 2013, 12:29 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
I think you should be very careful about this dial. As the old saying goes, if something seems too good to be true . . . .
Michael |
19 June 2013, 12:53 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: hong kong
Posts: 300
|
the price is great but be careful... very suspicious... have it authenticated by someone.
|
19 June 2013, 12:54 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: hong kong
Posts: 300
|
what color is the "superlative ..." line
|
19 June 2013, 01:30 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
|
19 June 2013, 01:39 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
|
19 June 2013, 01:41 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
|
19 June 2013, 02:26 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
|
19 June 2013, 02:51 AM | #27 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
|
19 June 2013, 04:13 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
Michael |
|
19 June 2013, 04:31 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
That's why I posted it here first before doing anything silly.
I'm a sucker for the 'to good to be true'. That explanation which I've no doubt is correct is much easier to understand than one liners. ;-) Cheers. |
19 June 2013, 04:35 AM | #30 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Posts: 650
|
Oh, and I DO very much appreciate the time you've taken Michael (and the others who posted) to look at this.
Much obliged!!! :-) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.