ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 July 2013, 05:32 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Authentication Help Required (Rolex 16233)...Please.
Hi Guys.
I'm new to the forum and would appreciate your expert help. I bought a Rolex Datejust from Sanderson&Son about a month ago please see link below for actual watch. http://www.sandersonandson.com/51830.shtml When I received it, the size of the date magnification looked a bit suspect. I got in touch with Gary (Nice guy btw) and he agreed to have his watchmaker have a look at it and swap the crystal out if need be. I just received an email from Gary stating that the crystal had been replaced but still looks the same to him (with regards to magnification). He assured me that the crystal fitted is 100% the correct one for the model/year. I am due to receive the watch back tomorrow but am still a little unsure about the magnification issue (despite the reassurances). Can anyone experienced enough shed some light of date magnification? and indeed if some models have lower magnification? Many thanks in advance. |
24 July 2013, 10:28 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Looks fine to me. Should have a 62563 bracelet, date mag looks fine
Why on earth would you buy something THEN get it authenticated?
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
24 July 2013, 11:39 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Sanderson&Son had been recommended on this forum, so I knew that it was a safe purchase. It was just when I received it, the date mag seemed to be smaller than on other DateJusts. |
|
24 July 2013, 10:31 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: Submariner116610LN
Posts: 295
|
looks totally fine. plus you bought from a trusted seller so no worries. Next time you should def make sure your happy with the watch before u buy it though. Enjoy your classic Rollie!!
|
24 July 2013, 11:10 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Looks fine
|
24 July 2013, 11:17 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: land of oz
Watch: sundial
Posts: 2,219
|
looks good
nice pickup |
24 July 2013, 11:47 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Tommy
Location: New jersey
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 457
|
Looks good but I think too much money!
|
24 July 2013, 11:27 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
|
24 July 2013, 11:32 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
|
24 July 2013, 05:11 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
They state in the ad that it has a brand new crystal so why would they have a watchmaker check it out and then replace it again?
|
24 July 2013, 11:31 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
When I enquired, he stated the crystal was faultless (probably replaced not long before he acquired it)....hence the 'new crystal' in the description. Thanks for the reassurances guys. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.