ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Rolex Date Position and Placement | |||
No, leave it at the three o'clock position | 71 | 93.42% | |
Yes, I would be in favor of alternate positions | 5 | 6.58% | |
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
15 August 2013, 08:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
|
Rolex Date Position and Placement
I am wondering how many people would be in favor of positioning the date at something other than the current three o'clock placement. I have seen watches that have the date at the four o'clock or the six o'clock positions. What are your thoughts on this and do you think that is something we may eventually see in the Rolex family of watches?
|
15 August 2013, 09:09 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Why change it? Really the natural place to put it
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
15 August 2013, 09:16 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
sure, they can mess with the date all they like, but only if they bring back lugholes.
|
15 August 2013, 09:34 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
Funny how I sometimes struggle with these ideas. Change occurs everywhere, and there is a natural resistance to even progressive change. In this case, it would be change for the sake of change alone, and I have to vote 'No'.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
15 August 2013, 09:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
I like the date to be at the 3 o'clock position or not on the dial at all.
|
15 August 2013, 09:52 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 2,008
|
I also voted for three o'clock but am wondering if we will ever see anything different on one of the Rolex models?
|
15 August 2013, 09:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Shane
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,125
|
It would just look weird sitting anyplace else.
|
15 August 2013, 10:35 AM | #8 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
|
3 oclock is good but it wouldn't bother me at the 6 oclock position as in the Tudor HC.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
15 August 2013, 10:41 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
Leave it as is.
|
15 August 2013, 10:41 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
The current position is good to me, I buy other watches if I want a date elsewhere.
...Though a date indicator with a hand could be a though to ponder...
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
15 August 2013, 10:45 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,623
|
Id have to see it. They could make it work.
But i hope they don't change the position on their DJ and DD models. |
15 August 2013, 10:51 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
I like it where it is
__________________
|
15 August 2013, 11:19 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
With the Cyclops models it couldn't be anywhere else.
|
15 August 2013, 11:45 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
|
I like it where it is as well.
|
15 August 2013, 01:04 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Will
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 18078
Posts: 284
|
I like it because I can see the date when the watch is just peeking out the cuff of my shirt/jacket.
|
15 August 2013, 01:09 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: USA
Watch: DJ - Need Sub Bad
Posts: 1,889
|
The Zenith chronograph has the date window at 4:30
Should Rolex add a date to the Daytona, there is where it would go. Why on God's Green Earth move it on established models??? |
15 August 2013, 01:25 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
At 6:00 o'clock might be OK but not with Cyclops.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
15 August 2013, 01:27 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Eric
Location: KANSAS CITY,MO
Watch: 114060
Posts: 183
|
Keep it at 3:00.
|
15 August 2013, 01:30 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: canada
Watch: me post!
Posts: 3,804
|
I'm happy where it is. But If they moved it I wouldn't be up in arms
|
15 August 2013, 02:16 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
3pm for me.
|
15 August 2013, 02:23 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
I voted no because if they moved the position of the date window it would no longer be under the magnifier.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
15 August 2013, 10:45 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
|
15 August 2013, 11:02 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Another vote for the 3 position. I have seen placements at the 4, 6, and even 9 positions...3 is good.
|
15 August 2013, 11:49 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
3 o'clock for me.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
16 August 2013, 01:07 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I think it's perfect where it is but I wouldn't mind if it were in the 6 o'clock position.
|
16 August 2013, 04:25 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: London
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 38
|
Scrap the whole cyclops and manual movement Rolex should make a quartz digital watch ;)
|
16 August 2013, 04:38 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Date? What's a date?
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.