Pam243 on the Bay-FAKE??

[Grogrogro31]

Hello,

Here is the link to the watch:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/281161870071...84.m1438.l2649

.... I have reported this to the Bay, as Paneristi does not show any of the 243s made in 2009 L series, that's what it shows on the case back, however the auction is still running and there are bidders. What do you guys think is this watch legit??

Thank you!

[scottb2]

hard to tell but i would say fake - there are many more good pam fakes coming these days - i was shown a Pam 90 few weeks back and i couldnt tell the difference until i actually fiddled with the watch - crap = crap

[Mosco]

if someone is stupid enough not to check out the seller's feedback and see the 4th one down being a negative: "Fake case not panerai", they deserve to get screwed. There is a sucker born every minute, and we cannot protect those who choose to overlook the obvious. All the signs are there, if someone is anxious to part with their $4+k, let them.

[cajunron]

Originally Posted by Mosco

if someone is stupid enough not to check out the seller's feedback and see the 4th one down being a negative: "Fake case not panerai", they deserve to get screwed. There is a sucker born every minute, and we cannot protect those who choose to overlook the obvious. All the signs are there, if someone is anxious to part with their $4+k, let them.

And someone parted with $4,651.01, to be exact. I'm with you, Greg. Why would anyone spending that kind of bread, NOT check the sellers feedback? It is beyond me. And once (and if) the watch is determined fake and buyer (hopefully) reimbursed, who eats the loss? Ebay? Paypal?

[Cc1966]

Originally Posted by rgdejong

And someone parted with $4,651.01, to be exact. I'm with you, Greg. Why would anyone spending that kind of bread, NOT check the sellers feedback? It is beyond me. And once (and if) the watch is determined fake and buyer (hopefully) reimbursed, who eats the loss? Ebay? Paypal?

PayPal then the seller, hopefully...