ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

aek · 14 September 2013, 09:09 PM

Does this 14060 Sub looks ok to you guys? Dont know if the bracelet is the original.

https://www.rolexforums.com/attachme...1&d=1379156786

aek · 14 September 2013, 09:10 PM

It is a W serie from 1995.

Cesium133 · 14 September 2013, 09:29 PM

Looks good to me.

Cc1966 · 14 September 2013, 10:00 PM

Looks OK from your pics.

gpfps · 14 September 2013, 10:40 PM

Compared to mine new in 2011, my end links are tight to the case no gaps or movement. But yours might not be like that from wear or taking the band on and off. Other wise looks like nice example of 14060.

nick c · 14 September 2013, 10:53 PM

Looks good

eeh100773 · 14 September 2013, 11:02 PM

Looks exactly like mine. Good.

samsmart · 14 September 2013, 11:20 PM

My A serial has 501b endlinks. They are also much tighter to the case. The watch looks good, and end links are a simple fix.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

azguy · 14 September 2013, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by samsmart

My A serial has 501b endlinks. They are also much tighter to the case. The watch looks good, and end links are a simple fix.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

I agree, I think those end links are incorrect...

DULLYJAY · 14 September 2013, 11:46 PM

I have a E serial, think 1993 year. It has 501B endlinks. Your watch looks good.

SWISSAHOLICS · 14 September 2013, 11:48 PM

Yup looks good from the pics

aek · 15 September 2013, 01:14 AM

Indeed the end-links is troubleing me... Arent they supposed to be 501/501B ?!

77T · 15 September 2013, 01:44 AM

You also need the clasp code checked (not seen in pics). Bracelet may be from wholly different era. This may just be a marriage of head and pieces from other watches.

sea-dweller · 15 September 2013, 01:57 AM

Looks fine!

CrownMe · 15 September 2013, 09:36 AM

Looks good to me as well

aek · 16 September 2013, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

You also need the clasp code checked (not seen in pics). Bracelet may be from wholly different era. This may just be a marriage of head and pieces from other watches.

93150 is written on the clasp togheter with the letter " I "

According to what I have read, "I" = 1984..

77T · 16 September 2013, 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aek

It is a W serie from 1995.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aek

93150 is written on the clasp togheter with the letter " I "

According to what I have read, "I" = 1984..

Ah so, as I suspected. Then it is really up to you if having a bracelet 10 years older than head matters.

Perhaps an additional price bargaining point.

Phllox · 17 September 2013, 12:36 AM

To confirm my 14060 W series (1995) has 501b endlinks, not 593.
Otherwise this one looks very very similar to mine ...

aek · 17 September 2013, 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

Ah so, as I suspected. Then it is really up to you if having a bracelet 10 years older than head matters.

Perhaps an additional price bargaining point.

It annoys me, that's all.. But the price would be lower I guess, since its not all original.. What would you think i fair price would be? He is asking 3500 €.

bayerische · 17 September 2013, 02:50 AM

Looks real, but lots of polish done to it, and the bracelet is IMO very stretched. Make sure that's taken into your offering price.

applebook · 17 September 2013, 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bayerische

Looks real, but lots of polish done to it, and the bracelet is IMO very stretched. Make sure that's taken into your offering price.

Buffed to death! Should be significantly discounted compared to unbuffed/unmolested 14060s.

crowncollection · 17 September 2013, 06:36 AM

Looks ok, band and case are not the best condition

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

77T · 17 September 2013, 09:31 PM

I can't really do justice by throwing out a good price point.

If it is all good inside and out and you would want it, then you should feel good about buying it. I would say better examples could be found in same price zone though.

aek · 18 September 2013, 03:30 AM

So, bracelet 10 years older than the head. Very stretched bracelet, wrong end-links and a lot of polish done to it. Does is sound like a good deal, not really.. Think i will pass on this one..

14 September 2013, 09:09 PM	#1
aek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Milano Posts: 18	Submariner 14060, looks good to you? Does this 14060 Sub looks ok to you guys? Dont know if the bracelet is the original. https://www.rolexforums.com/attachme...1&d=1379156786 Attached Images

14 September 2013, 10:00 PM	#4
Cc1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Christopher Location: Georgia, USA Watch: ing the Sea... Posts: 6,713	Looks OK from your pics. __________________ "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "*Curmudgeons* " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc

14 September 2013, 11:48 PM	#11
SWISSAHOLICS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Here! Watch: Rolex Posts: 4,366	Yup looks good from the pics __________________ 16610LN \| 16613LB \| 16710 Pepsi \| 118238 \| 116500 (White) \| 116500 (Black) \| 116710BLNR \| 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."

15 September 2013, 01:44 AM	#13
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 42,013	Submariner 14060, looks good to you? You also need the clasp code checked (not seen in pics). Bracelet may be from wholly different era. This may just be a marriage of head and pieces from other watches. __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

17 September 2013, 02:50 AM	#20
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Looks real, but lots of polish done to it, and the bracelet is IMO very stretched. Make sure that's taken into your offering price. __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

14 September 2013, 09:10 PM	#2
aek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Milano Posts: 18	It is a W serie from 1995.

14 September 2013, 09:29 PM	#3
Cesium133 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Posts: 2,037	Looks good to me.

14 September 2013, 10:40 PM	#5
gpfps Banned Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: George Location: Detroit Michigan Watch: 18078 Posts: 1,142	Compared to mine new in 2011, my end links are tight to the case no gaps or movement. But yours might not be like that from wear or taking the band on and off. Other wise looks like nice example of 14060.

14 September 2013, 10:53 PM	#6
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Looks good

14 September 2013, 11:02 PM	#7
eeh100773 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: "Fast" Eddie Location: Asbury Park NJ Watch: 14060 T Series '96 Posts: 1,482	Looks exactly like mine. Good.

14 September 2013, 11:20 PM	#8
samsmart "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: sam Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Me Tint Posts: 3,777	My A serial has 501b endlinks. They are also much tighter to the case. The watch looks good, and end links are a simple fix. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

14 September 2013, 11:46 PM	#10
DULLYJAY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: California Watch: Sub. Want more. Posts: 181	I have a E serial, think 1993 year. It has 501B endlinks. Your watch looks good.

15 September 2013, 01:14 AM	#12
aek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Milano Posts: 18	Indeed the end-links is troubleing me... Arent they supposed to be 501/501B ?!

15 September 2013, 01:57 AM	#14
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Looks fine!

15 September 2013, 09:36 AM	#15
CrownMe "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Kevin Location: Maryland Watch: My Open 6 Posts: 3,433	Looks good to me as well

17 September 2013, 12:36 AM	#18
Phllox "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Paris Posts: 73	To confirm my 14060 W series (1995) has 501b endlinks, not 593. Otherwise this one looks very very similar to mine ...

17 September 2013, 06:36 AM	#22
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Looks ok, band and case are not the best condition Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free __________________ watches many

17 September 2013, 09:31 PM	#23
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 42,013	I can't really do justice by throwing out a good price point. If it is all good inside and out and you would want it, then you should feel good about buying it. I would say better examples could be found in same price zone though. __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

18 September 2013, 03:30 AM	#24
aek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Milano Posts: 18	So, bracelet 10 years older than the head. Very stretched bracelet, wrong end-links and a lot of polish done to it. Does is sound like a good deal, not really.. Think i will pass on this one..

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)