ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 October 2013, 11:21 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14
|
Seadweller or Submariner
I'm looking for a Rolex that will be worn daily (is this feasible?). My question is should I go for a new Submariner or a SD (I would go DS but can't swing it right now)? If the SD is "collectible" I wouldn't want to reduce it's value by wearing it and risk scratching it. I can only have ONE! I really want a SD but out of respect for its collect-ability I don't want to just throw $ away. I fear I'm not making sense.
Last edited by jcrump; 1 October 2013 at 11:24 AM.. Reason: added comment |
1 October 2013, 11:22 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
|
A Rolex watch is meant to be worn. Buy the one you like the most, wear it and enjoy it. Just for clarity which Submariner model are you considering?
|
1 October 2013, 11:28 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
|
A sd over a new sub all day
|
1 October 2013, 11:30 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14
|
2008 or newer. 116613
|
1 October 2013, 11:33 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
I would take the new sub, SD is a little large for my taste.
I personally don't think the SD will be a collectible; there are too many that have been produced. |
1 October 2013, 11:33 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14
|
|
1 October 2013, 11:33 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
Definitely a classic SD. The lack of the magnification bubble is a bit stealth, but you still have the convenience of a date.
I love mine. It's a great daily wear watch and gets most of my wrist time. It may command a bit of a premium for a new old stock one, but it's not a rare collectable.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
1 October 2013, 11:36 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,601
|
Sd.
Seriously,no worries, meant to be worn!
__________________
|
1 October 2013, 11:38 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14
|
That makes sense. I'm very new to the Rolex world. This will be my first other than the one I was just Will'ed but cannot wear because it is TOO much bling.
|
1 October 2013, 11:39 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
Either would be a good choice! They can (and should) be worn daily .
|
1 October 2013, 11:43 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Either way it's a great choice
|
1 October 2013, 11:43 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Sd
|
1 October 2013, 11:50 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SA, Texas.
Watch: * { SD & DJ } *
Posts: 943
|
Sd 16600 . . .
__________________
......... All In. |
1 October 2013, 12:02 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Sub
|
1 October 2013, 12:31 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I love both but ultimately decided on the sub. No regrets and a great everyday watch. I wouldn't hesitate to wear an SD everyday either.
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
1 October 2013, 12:38 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: justRay
Location: Back2California
Watch: Birdies
Posts: 1,921
|
That's a tough one. Both are great. If it's the first, I would go with the sub
__________________
JJ "Tranquil? Just wait till I get started!! LOL! LOL!" --JJ Rolex~By way of an extraordinary life, and all the simple pleasures it has to offer~ |
1 October 2013, 12:39 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
|
1 October 2013, 01:02 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Kitchener,Ontario
Posts: 15
|
|
2 October 2013, 02:34 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
I've got both and would recommend the Sub as your first - first of many hopefully :)
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
2 October 2013, 02:48 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
|
This one
|
2 October 2013, 03:02 AM | #21 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
Sd
|
2 October 2013, 03:05 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
|
No brainer for me, SUB all the way.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
2 October 2013, 03:10 AM | #23 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
I prefer this style sub>
And this style SD> |
2 October 2013, 03:14 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Matt
Location: Nashville TN
Watch: 16600, 116660
Posts: 122
|
I've had my Sea Dweller for well over 10yrs and worn it everyday all day until I got a DeepSea about a month ago.
The Sea Dweller is a wonderful watch and like the Submariner is meant to be worn. Don't worry about the collect-ability unless you're a collector. It will still be very re-sellable if you ever decide to part with it and you will have gotten well more out of it by wearing it than what modest loss in value. Both are winning choices. For me it was the Sea Dweller and I never regretted it. All the best. |
2 October 2013, 03:16 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Both are meant to be worn daily, I've been wearing my sub for almost three years, everyday all day.
__________________
|
2 October 2013, 03:20 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: GA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 4,431
|
Have worn and enjoyed both the 16610 and the 16600...still have the SD.
SD is the answer to all of the zombie apocalypse, desert island, keep only one questions. |
2 October 2013, 06:07 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: California
Watch: 116618LN
Posts: 566
|
New Submariner
|
2 October 2013, 06:36 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM...
Posts: 1,403
|
Never mind collectible or not, the SubC is the ultimate daily wearer...
__________________
Rolex - SubC... AP - Diver... Panerai - PAM380 Omega - Speedy PRO |
2 October 2013, 07:45 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
SD would be my vote. Wear it....enjoy it!
Good luck! |
2 October 2013, 08:00 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
Sd!
16600 SD was my first, wear it 90% of the time.
I really want a DSSD, but I'm torn as whether to sell the SD or not. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.