|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 November 2013, 04:17 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
|
Adjustment Period?
I am curious if anyone had any teething problems in becoming accustomed to their ROO models?
particularly with respect to overall 44mm size, thickness, and strap wear? |
|
|
|
18 November 2013, 05:28 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Logan
Location: USA
Posts: 2,483
|
Pics please?
|
|
|
|
|
19 November 2013, 05:29 AM
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 1,601
|
on the road but will try and post one when back.
i guess the silence means that, for the most part, ROO's have fit great (despite 'larger' size) right off the bat? i have been very accustomed to bracelet watches an wonderin if im just struggling with the relatively tighter fit from a strap. |
|
|
|
|
19 November 2013, 05:51 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
|
Had my diver for many months now and still feels like the firts day, not bad but not the most comfortable watch on my stable.
|
|
|
|
|
19 November 2013, 06:55 AM
|
#5 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
|
Only when there is a stiff strap like a hornback, or even the Gran Prix that I put on the 44mm FC. Otherwise most have been good right out of the box.
|
|
|
|
|
19 November 2013, 11:20 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
I have a diver (42mm) and I have to say, I find the 44mm more comfortable than the diver. The larger size seemed to better spread the weight -- seemed more balanced to me fwiw.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
