ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 December 2013, 01:55 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 370
|
Worth Regulating?
I have a new SUBC which is running about +6/+7 seconds fast a day. I realize its on the fence of COSC certifications but I would ideally like to be around +/-2/3 seconds a day. My $2,500 Omega kept better time then this watch which bothers me. So I guess my question is should I send my Sub in for regulation? It's brand new so im assuming this servicing would be free correct? Also, how long does this process usually take? I live in New York
|
21 December 2013, 02:05 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I would suggest wear it for a few months, try different resting positions at night which might help with a second maybe two less gain per day. See how it performs longer term before having it opened up.
I would think RSC on 5th could turn it around within a few days, if not while you wait, depending on how busy they are. |
21 December 2013, 02:11 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 370
|
I've tried a few resting positions, didn't seem to help. I've only been wearing the watch for about a month so maybe it needs to break in a little. Is opening the watch something you want to avoid?
|
21 December 2013, 02:12 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
COSC numbers are testing criteria, not what you should expect.
It may slow down by a second after a couple of months, but that still would not be very good timekeeping. Stop by the NYC RSC and they should regulate it while you wait - free.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
21 December 2013, 02:15 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I think if you're taking it to RSC, you're in good hands and would have zero worries. I just thought you may have just worn it for a day or two, so was suggesting a longer term trial to see how it's timing. I think a month is a good enough indicator, so I wouldn't hesitate to take it as you'll be even happier with it.
|
21 December 2013, 02:19 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 370
|
Okay, thanks for the help gents.
|
21 December 2013, 02:28 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
|
21 December 2013, 02:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Your mechanical watch is operating fine. For greatest consistency and precision you should consider a quartz movement.
|
21 December 2013, 03:42 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
It will be better keep it with 5 seconds range. I would regulate it.
|
21 December 2013, 03:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crazytown
Posts: 228
|
Everyone says rest it differently at night, but why is it I hear more and more that this does not work with newer watches. I've tried it myself as well as have read many other forum members doing so with little change... On new pieces only.
|
21 December 2013, 03:59 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
|
I agree, the newer watches don't seem to exhibit as much positional variation. There is still a little bit there though.
|
21 December 2013, 04:10 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
|
I would do what padi56 suggests before running over to your nearest RSC. Of course if you are not "Happy" then by all means go get it regulated at RSC in New York City since you are so close. But think about it, first of all it's a mechanical watch which does not reset the time each day to the Atomic clock in Colorado. Secondly even if it is +7 to +8 seconds fast a day that is still more than 99.9___% accurate.....
I'd say "Chill" over the Holidays and just enjoy your watch you can always get it 'Regulated Down the Road'. Or things could be worse...you could be like me whose watch never stays in regulation. For some weird reason(it runs in our family, my older brother and my deceased Dad)my body throws mechanical watches as well as watches with batteries out of any type of regulation. The time on my Rolex can be 30 to 40 seconds fast one day and then a few days later be running a minute slow. It's all over the place and watches with batteries will just stop working...I can replace the battery and a week or two later it quits working again. The only watch I can wear which stays in regulation is my Casio G-Shock which stores energy by any light source and resets the time each day!!! It's all good...take care.....Leo
__________________
SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!! |
21 December 2013, 04:30 AM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Crazytown
Posts: 228
|
Quote:
|
|
21 December 2013, 04:33 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Consistency is what you want, erratic gains or loses are when you should become concerned.
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
21 December 2013, 04:35 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
Had the same issue with my EXP II. It was +7s/day. I had it regulated to +1s/day and could not be happier. Resting positions had zero impact.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
21 December 2013, 04:43 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
|
Mine did the same thing for the first few weeks. It was actually +15. But it has settled down and is within spec now. Give it a little more time if it's a new piece.
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca |
21 December 2013, 08:03 AM | #17 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
|
21 December 2013, 08:36 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: philip
Location: missouri
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,094
|
I wouldn't yet. Leave it crown up at night. It may lose a couple of seconds.
Once I had one similar and the AD said they could improve that. When I got it back after after 2-3 weeks there was little change and after three years had to have a service. If it ain't broke don't fix it. |
21 December 2013, 08:57 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Had the same issue with my Sub-C. +10 for 2 or 3 months and I decided to wait. Now 6 months later 0.5 a day.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.