The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 December 2013, 06:22 PM   #1
Horofied
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
Quick poll - AP ROO Nov SS OR AP ROO Nov Ceramic

Hi Guys,

I hav shortlisted 2 Offshores available to me for immediate delivery.
One is the ROO Novelty in Stainless steel and the other is the ROO Novelty in Ceramic.
The Steel one looks great on the wrist and i love how it pops with the colour contrasts of silver/white, black and steel. Very noticeable.
The Ceramic is very under the radar although I do believe it will shine under the right light conditions. Also the quality of the finishing on the ceramic has to be seen to be appreciated.

Which would you guys choose and why? Bear in mind there is a huge price differential between the two.

Appreciate your comments, tks :-)
Horofied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 06:26 PM   #2
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,116
You should post a poll. Ceramic for me. All black more stealth and I had a Legacy which I loved.
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 06:36 PM   #3
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Definitely the ceramic for me. No contest. In this particular case actually, I think the Ceramic actually is the more "shouty" watch and shines better. Would have got this if it is available in 42mm.

Here's a pic from a recent boutique visit :


benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 06:44 PM   #4
Horofied
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by conkers View Post
You should post a poll. Ceramic for me. All black more stealth and I had a Legacy which I loved.
Thanks for your comments Roger. I did want to post a poll but couldnt figure out how to do that :-)
Horofied is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 07:23 PM   #5
conkers
"TRF" Member
 
conkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Roger
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 6,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horofied View Post
Thanks for your comments Roger. I did want to post a poll but couldnt figure out how to do that :-)
It is under "additional options" on the post new thread page. Not sure whether you can do it retrospectively though!
conkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 09:17 PM   #6
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
All ceramic gets my vote.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 December 2013, 10:16 PM   #7
PureWhiteDesign
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austria
Posts: 1
I vote for the AP26400SO, because the all ceramic version is too dark imho. The steel with the shiny dial is more charming in my opinion.
PureWhiteDesign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 12:18 AM   #8
yachty 1
"TRF" Member
 
yachty 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ny
Watch: yacht master
Posts: 948
Love the ceramic, but dont love the price point
yachty 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 12:58 AM   #9
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
HMMM...tough one...I had the 44SS and thought it was fantastic, but also really like the new ceramic pieces...

For me, it would probably depend on the price point...I don't know what prices you are getting, but if you are paying list, then probably the ceramic since it's a bit more but the newest model/material. In the more likely scenario that you are getting a better price on the SS since it's been out for a while and not much off the ceramic, I'd go SS.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 01:14 AM   #10
rovelty 48
"TRF" Member
 
rovelty 48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: indonesia
Posts: 77
SS for me. The colours blend nicely; silver dial, black ceramic bezel, the red chrono hands..
The ceramic just too black, too dark.
I think the SS can be worn for casual and more formal wear, as the ceramic more sporty/casual.

For your consideration





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
rovelty 48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 01:31 AM   #11
edo
"TRF" Member
 
edo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sarajevo
Posts: 1,929
SS for diversity. And for stealth piece I would choose carbon...
edo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 01:47 AM   #12
sdg1871
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Scott
Location: New York, NY
Watch: 18k YG Daytona
Posts: 337
To me the ceramic is way too dark without enough contrast. The stainless steel pops much more to me. Of course if durability in terms of resistance to scratching is a concern then obviously the ceramic wins. But I just don't like the lack of contrast on that watch but of course that is a subjective opinion. Everyone's aesthetic tastes are different.
sdg1871 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:00 AM   #13
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdg1871 View Post
To me the ceramic is way too dark without enough contrast. The stainless steel pops much more to me. Of course if durability in terms of resistance to scratching is a concern then obviously the ceramic wins. But I just don't like the lack of contrast on that watch but of course that is a subjective opinion. Everyone's aesthetic tastes are different.
+1

For the price of the 44mm ceramic I would spend a little more and get the RG 44mm.
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:05 AM   #14
Soly20
2024 Pledge Member
 
Soly20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
I actually prefer the FC over the ceramic and SS. Maybe the SS between these 2.
Soly20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:13 AM   #15
orangedial
"TRF" Member
 
orangedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
My preference for 44mm Novelty: PT > RG > SS > FC > Ceramic
orangedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:17 AM   #16
TAKUYA
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
TAKUYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soly20 View Post
I actually prefer the FC over the ceramic and SS. Maybe the SS between these 2.
Same here Good luck with your decision!

I like the light weight of FC on the big watch and it keeps the watch looking new all the time.
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active

Instagram @takuyawatches
TAKUYA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 03:58 AM   #17
DreambreaX
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Rolex Estate
Posts: 1,304
i choose none. go for the gold one, its more precious.
DreambreaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 05:55 AM   #18
nishant
"TRF" Member
 
nishant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Nishant T.
Location: DC Area
Watch: JLC NS Chrono GMT
Posts: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by singe89 View Post
+1

for the price of the 44mm ceramic i would spend a little more and get the rg 44mm.
+ 2
nishant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 06:06 AM   #19
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horofied View Post

The Steel one looks great on the wrist and i love how it pops with the colour contrasts of silver/white, black and steel. Very noticeable.


Ceramic is very under the radar although

I do believe it will shine under the right light conditions.

Also the quality of the finishing on the ceramic has to be seen to be appreciated.
Bear in mind there is a huge price differential between the two.






SS.

You gave several caveats in your description of the ceramic.
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 07:20 AM   #20
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I prefer the SS, and for the same money I would get the SS and a RO, rather than just the Ceramic, if I didn't already have one.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 01:51 PM   #21
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
Kinda hard to tell the time easily on the all black (for me)
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:16 PM   #22
gummy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
gummy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
Tough one...

I have yet to have the 44mm Ceramic on my wrist, but I have the 44mm FC and love it.

I like how the 44mm FC is very stealth - but is really really cool in natural sunlight. I've seen pics of the ceramic in natural sunlight and it looks cool too.

Tough part is I would mind picking up the 44mm SS b/c I really like then dial and like heavier watches.

Tough choices ahead - good luck on your decision...
gummy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 02:24 PM   #23
PatekCollector
"TRF" Member
 
PatekCollector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Khalid
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 1,328
All ceramic 4me.
__________________
Life is too short, to waste time hating anyone!.

Instagram: @PatekCollector
PatekCollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 January 2014, 12:42 AM   #24
HenrysDeepsea
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2
That ceramic is pure sex and pretty scratch proof. Love it.
HenrysDeepsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 05:08 PM   #25
ra's ag
"TRF" Member
 
ra's ag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: David
Location: NYC & Scottsdale
Watch: The next one...
Posts: 296
SS for me. Forged Carbon would be my preference over ceramic.
ra's ag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2014, 09:18 PM   #26
Yoda
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
Ceramic
Yoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2014, 07:02 AM   #27
Aldino
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Miami
Posts: 60
Hi there,

I am also facing the same dilemma and I am therefore curious to know the outcome of this Quick Poll. So far it seems that the ceramic has the upper hand, and therefore I want to revisit the subject.

I have the opportunity to get the AP ROO NOV in CERAMIC right now or wait a few months on the AP ROO NOV in SS. PROS/CONS: There is obviously a small price difference between the two, but that is manageable. The SS is already a few years old, whereas the CERAMIC is much newer. The appearance of the SS is much more AP, whereas the CERAMIC is more low-key.

This would be my first ever AP, as the remainder of my collection consists of Rolex's, Panerai's, a IWC and Chopard Mille Miglia's XL. I like the size of the AP ROO NOV and therefore this is my preferred choice.

I look forward to your suggestions and especially from those of you that own one of these watches or perhaps both already.

Thanks,
Aldino
Attached Images
   
Aldino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2014, 07:15 AM   #28
Audemars Piguet
"TRF" Member
 
Audemars Piguet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: Europe
Watch: AP
Posts: 5,252
Ceramic
Audemars Piguet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2014, 07:19 AM   #29
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Ceramic
__________________
subtona is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2014, 07:29 AM   #30
Urooj
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 352
Ceramic All the way

I think the ceramic is way better than the steel version. Nobody finishes ceramic better than AP. It is probably one of the best AP ROO i have tried on recently.

Regards
Urooj
Attached Images
   
Urooj is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.