The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 14 April 2014, 09:12 AM   #1
iclick
"TRF" Member
 
iclick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
Yet another Michael Young report

About 10 years ago I replaced the Oyster Flip-Lock band on my vintage GMT and lost track of it. Until recently I had assumed that I had tossed it like I did the original and subsequent Jubilee bands many years ago, a habit I held onto for too long in thinking worn-out bands, etc. were trash and of no further interest to me or anyone else. It's only a miracle I didn't toss my original faded fat-font bezel after I lost it in the yard for several years, which was replaced before recovering it, but that's another story.

Anyway, I found the discarded Oyster band (93150 with 93160 Flip-Lock clasp and 580 end links) a few months ago and thought it would be a good candidate for Michael Young, the band guru in Hong Kong. After he received it I got an email from him stating that it would take 8-10 weeks for service, but after only two weeks he emailed me again with the news that it was ready for shipment. I received it only a few days ago and thought I would write a report. BTW, I shipped via FedEx without insurance, but I would recommend using EMS that allows insurance for the full value, as that will help with your peace of mind and costs only 2% of the declared value extra.

The overall appearance and finish is first-rate, especially on the outer surfaces, which I tried to depict in the photos. Unfortunately the outer surfaces of the links (Photo 1 & 2) look almost ceramic in the photos, but in reality look like the brushed finish I remember in a new band. The slack in the links is much less than before, and laying the pieces out I tried to place them in a position that shows the maximum slack, which as you can see isn't much. The piece with the extra link has a bit more than the other. Photos 3 & 4 show the underside.

The only negative I might suggest is that the link in the clasp (Photo 5) has more slack than any of the other links and more than I see in the clasps of the other Oyster bands I have. I doubt if this would be any functional issue at all, however, but I wonder if perhaps they forgot to service that one.

I regret that I forgot to photograph the band before shipping it out , so you'll have to take my word that the appearance and slack are much improved. It was not a basket-case by any means with only moderate slack in the links, but looked like a well-cared-for daily wearer with about 19 years under its belt.

Overall I would give the band an A- with the only deduction the loose clasp link. Finish is an A, time of completion A+, but communication only a C. He failed to answer my first email and didn't answer all the lame questions I had, but I give Michael Young a thumbs-up overall for the service he provided.
Attached Images
         
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969)
Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993)
Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993)
Tudor Sub 79090 (1992)
iclick is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.