ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

larry88 · 19 May 2014, 11:58 PM

Hi all

I have been studying the 93150 bracelet on my 1680 (6m) and got to a point where all the evidence suggests that it's not genuine, despite RSC did a complete overhaul recently and they didn't have any issues with the bracelet.

I then started to look for a used 93150 bracelet and i come across this link below. The first one is extremely similar to what i have and now all of a sudden, i am starting to believe that mine is probably original bracelet after all.

What do you guys think?

http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767......+USD1140+up

JohnBaker3 · 20 May 2014, 01:42 AM

The 93150 has been around for quite a while. There are several minor variations over time.

If the RSC didn't shread it, it is genuine.....

Enjoy your bracelet.

JustinK · 20 May 2014, 01:50 AM

Post some pictures if you want opinions.

As already stated if it's been to Rolex it's most likely real.

crowncollection · 20 May 2014, 06:26 AM

Pics

azguy · 21 May 2014, 12:02 AM

I bought a bracelet from that guy once, great seller and I would have no reason to believe it wasn't 100% legit.

larry88 · 21 May 2014, 12:40 AM

Here you go - took it with my phone so not quality not great but hopefully good enough?

crowncollection · 21 May 2014, 06:51 PM

Looks good

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

RC2 · 21 May 2014, 08:34 PM

Looks like it's ok

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

buenosdias · 21 May 2014, 08:55 PM

To me it looks OK!
Clasp code VC for 1978, 93150 "stamp" also OK. Still a nice thick crown on clasp and matching "old style" 580s

Enjoy

larry88 · 21 May 2014, 11:33 PM

thank you all for the supports and comments. I can now sleep better...

redfred · 22 May 2014, 12:18 AM

I have a VC 93150 on my 1978 GW and the stampings are identical to yours, nothing to worry about!

larry88 · 22 May 2014, 12:16 AM

since i am at it, one more for all to provide views / comments. This is on 16800 (original receipts dated 1984). I am concerned also with the diver extension links. The bracelet feels lighter as well, but maybe because I am paranoid.

Comments?

greekbum · 22 May 2014, 12:23 AM

All are good in your pics

larry88 · 22 May 2014, 12:37 AM

thank you guys....this is probably better than RSC - faster and free...(yes where i come from RSC charges for verification).

photo of 16800 to share with all. Not a vintage but neither a modern piece. Just in between..

crowncollection · 22 May 2014, 06:21 AM

All good

19 May 2014, 11:58 PM	#1
larry88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 29	Help 93150 Hi all I have been studying the 93150 bracelet on my 1680 (6m) and got to a point where all the evidence suggests that it's not genuine, despite RSC did a complete overhaul recently and they didn't have any issues with the bracelet. I then started to look for a used 93150 bracelet and i come across this link below. The first one is extremely similar to what i have and now all of a sudden, i am starting to believe that mine is probably original bracelet after all. What do you guys think? http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767......+USD1140+up

20 May 2014, 01:42 AM	#2
JohnBaker3 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: John Baker III Location: Spring,Texas Watch: 1971 Red Sub Posts: 2,222	The 93150 has been around for quite a while. There are several minor variations over time. If the RSC didn't shread it, it is genuine..... Enjoy your bracelet. __________________ As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake.

20 May 2014, 06:26 AM	#4
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Pics __________________ watches many

21 May 2014, 06:51 PM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	Looks good Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

21 May 2014, 08:34 PM	#8
RC2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Rich Location: NC Watch: Rolex 1675 Posts: 2,359	Looks like it's ok Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97

20 May 2014, 01:50 AM	#3
JustinK 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Justin Location: Jupiter, FL Watch: 1530,1665,1680 Posts: 2,064	Post some pictures if you want opinions. As already stated if it's been to Rolex it's most likely real.

21 May 2014, 12:02 AM	#5
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	I bought a bracelet from that guy once, great seller and I would have no reason to believe it wasn't 100% legit.

21 May 2014, 12:40 AM	#6
larry88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 29	Here you go - took it with my phone so not quality not great but hopefully good enough?

21 May 2014, 08:55 PM	#9
buenosdias "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: SeB Location: Germany Watch: MaD_aT_gMt Posts: 1,219	To me it looks OK! Clasp code VC for 1978, 93150 "stamp" also OK. Still a nice thick crown on clasp and matching "old style" 580s Enjoy

21 May 2014, 11:33 PM	#10
larry88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 29	thank you all for the supports and comments. I can now sleep better...

22 May 2014, 12:18 AM	#11
redfred "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: newcastle Posts: 342	I have a VC 93150 on my 1978 GW and the stampings are identical to yours, nothing to worry about!

22 May 2014, 12:16 AM	#12
larry88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 29	since i am at it, one more for all to provide views / comments. This is on 16800 (original receipts dated 1984). I am concerned also with the diver extension links. The bracelet feels lighter as well, but maybe because I am paranoid. Comments?

22 May 2014, 12:23 AM	#13
greekbum "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Nikos Location: Florida Watch: Rolex GMT 16750 Posts: 8,418	All are good in your pics __________________ Follow Me On Instagram @nickgogas Original Owner ROLEX 16750 GMT Daily Wearer For Over 13,000 Days And Counting

22 May 2014, 12:37 AM	#14
larry88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Location: Singapore Posts: 29	thank you guys....this is probably better than RSC - faster and free...(yes where i come from RSC charges for verification). photo of 16800 to share with all. Not a vintage but neither a modern piece. Just in between..

22 May 2014, 06:21 AM	#15
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	All good __________________ watches many

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)