|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
22 May 2014, 09:21 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver
Watch: 16750, 5513, GV
Posts: 153
|
Thoughts on this 1680 White Sub
Hi everyone, I viewed this watch today and would like to seek some opinions on it. It has a 5 million serial number which dates this to 1978. One of my concerns is that the case has been polished incorrectly. It is priced fairly to reflect this at $5300. Thank you in advance for your help.
    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 11:28 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 677
|
I wish I had customers who thought that an average 1680 head was "priced fairly" at only $5300.
Michael |
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 11:42 AM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 16800 (1981)
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
 I'd let this one pass, OP. Too many things wrong. It's definitely a below average example.
__________________
Wound For Life Reviews and stories about built-to-last timepieces woundforlife.com |
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 12:11 PM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Many collectors would call this a 1680 mk III white dial. I agree with Michael above. The hands don't match the dial, the second hand is missing the tritium, the pearl is missing the tritium, and there appears to be damage to the 9 o'clock lume bar. I am not seeing a $5,300.00 here.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 12:16 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Los Angeles CA.
Watch: aHolic
Posts: 331
|
PASS, dont see the chamfers and yes its overpolished..hands doesnt match the plots and missing sec. tritium..
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 12:21 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
better examples for the price out there
__________________
watches many |
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 01:47 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
Pass.
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 01:47 PM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Vancouver
Watch: 16750, 5513, GV
Posts: 153
|
My error, a 91350 bracelet is included with an acceptable amount of stretch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 02:37 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Salvatore
Location: Nor. Cal.
Watch: Gilt 1675&10 Subs
Posts: 89
|
Pass! Many better examples out there at same price point!
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 03:44 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
nah.
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 03:53 PM
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Run away...
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 06:49 PM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
Way better examples available at this price.
Research and you will find. Look up the sticky of trusted vintage sellers and send them a PM. This example above is all wrong. |
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 06:50 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Ben
Location: Asia
Watch: Gilt sub
Posts: 1,669
|
Pass
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 08:08 PM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,132
|
Poor example imho.
|
|
|
|
|
22 May 2014, 09:40 PM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 176
|
Pass. One of the worst over polished examples I have seen.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
23 May 2014, 05:30 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
Sorry to just repeat all the advice above but this is a pass
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
