ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: 50th anniversary submariner or GMT master II? | |||
Submariner | 37 | 37.37% | |
GMT Master II | 62 | 62.63% | |
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
21 March 2008, 01:41 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2
|
50th Anniversary Submariner or GMT Master II????
I am interested to know what most men would like best between these two - I am not a Rolex expert - and I think they are both beautiful in their own way... which one holds the most prestige? - or value? - so to speak???? thank you!!!! need to choose between the two asap, so any advice would be so helpful.
|
21 March 2008, 01:50 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Welcome to TRF!
It's a matter of taste and personal preference. I have owned both models, but I for my part would prefer the Sub Date LV. At least to me, the SS GMT IIc turned out to be too blingy for my liking. Yes, the new GMT IIc has a very nice updated bracelet with solid centre links and (socalled) "improved" clasp but I just like the OLD Oyster bracelet better, despite it having the old-style clasp on non-solid centre links. The old Oyster bracelet is proven by time and is a very well-made bracelet, indeed. The ceramic bezel might be cool, too, but still I for my part prefer the old-style anodized Alumium bezel insert to the ceramic one. IF you damage the ceramic bezel insert, you would also have to pay a lot to have it exchange for a new one. A complete ceramic bezel including insert costs a wopping 1,324 US $ and the ceramic bezel INSERT on its own costs US $ 734! Unlike the old-style bezel insert which can be exchanged for around 50 US $. But I suggest you try them both on and go for the one that appeals most to you. You cannot go wrong with either! Best of luck! Please post pics of the model you choose.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
21 March 2008, 01:52 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
You really can't go wrong with either choice. But I am more of a Sub fan so I chose the Sub
Good luck Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
21 March 2008, 02:00 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
|
Welcome to TRF! Had the same dilema a few months back......opted to get the LV myself! Good luck with your decision.....these polls are fun but by no means take it for picking YOUR watch! Which one smiles back at you?!
P.S. > waiting for Basil myself to see if they do indeed come out with a ceramic Pepsi!!!!
__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV |
21 March 2008, 02:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2
|
pictures posted
here are the pics of what I can choose from... i have both in my possession and have to choose one! I know it is a matter of preference... but is there one that is more special?
|
21 March 2008, 02:45 AM | #6 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Welcome to TRF, Angelina......I'd go with the new GMT-II any day.
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
21 March 2008, 02:45 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
Quote:
Personally, I would be elated if someone would give me either one of those watches. Sean EDIT - Give me the GMT. It has the improved clasp, improved movement, the maxi dial and the new ceramic bezel.
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
|
21 March 2008, 02:45 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
|
I went w/ my LV b/c of the RBR (see pic below). Good luck and have fun deciding!
__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.” Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV |
21 March 2008, 02:48 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 72
|
I would go with the LV Sub. I don't care for the new GMTIIc but I do like the now discontinued model.
|
21 March 2008, 02:50 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 825
|
Tough choice for me, I'm not too wild about Rolex's redesign with the ceramic bezel on the GMT, and I still don't know what the hell Rolex was thinking with that green bezel on the Sub. (sorry LV owners, I just don't like it). Having said that if I had to choose I would go with the GMT.
__________________
|
21 March 2008, 04:22 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
|
That makes 2
__________________
|
21 March 2008, 04:25 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
I like the GMT
|
21 March 2008, 04:41 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
|
I say GMT-IIc. It is every bit as usable as the sub and then some. They both have dates and more water resistance than anyone would need. BUT, the GMT also has the 24 hour hand and just enough bling. Its like a cross between a sub and SS daytona!
|
21 March 2008, 07:49 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Paul
Location: Lincolnshire UK
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 775
|
I say this one........but then I would!
Cheers Paul
__________________
|
21 March 2008, 08:08 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
|
Both are great choices. However, I think the "better" one to pick is the GMT II because of it's updated case and enhanced bracelet. Right now it is a hot item and slightly harder to find. For right now, I would rate it as the best choice.
|
21 March 2008, 08:09 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Man, ...... tough choice. Uh,.....humm.......OK,...no wait....
This One!! |
21 March 2008, 08:10 AM | #17 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Voted for gmt master II
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
21 March 2008, 08:35 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
I voted Submariner, but didn't see the two watches. Between the GREEN Submariner and the GMT2C, I would change my vote to the latter, as it is more versatile with wardrobe, IMO. Oh, and welcome to TRF. There are some great guys and gals here!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
21 March 2008, 08:40 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC, Philly.
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 695
|
I had the same two when making my choice. I went to the AD and the GMT won the smile test. The green sub would be a great second watch for me but the GMT was my first.
Now that I have the bug. I am either going for the white dial explorer II or the SS Daytona that I am on the list for. Good luck and welcome as this is an awesome place.....because of awesome people! |
21 March 2008, 08:42 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2
|
Can't go wrong with either. I have the IIc but wouldn't mind also owning the LV.
|
21 March 2008, 09:17 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
|
The Sub for me
|
21 March 2008, 09:26 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
|
WHAT IS UP with all of this choosing stuff??? Don't you know I'm in a delicate spot right now....seriously jonein' for a GMT iic...........
ok.....well, this isn't about me I guess..........BUT.....there is no way I could chose between the two. I think if I had both in front of me....my head would blow up....then I'd probably grab the GMT....no no.... the LV....uhh wait... the GMT........yeah the GMT. PS. I'm in no position to help! |
21 March 2008, 10:21 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 140
|
if its the LV then the Sub if not then the GMT II but not black
|
21 March 2008, 11:42 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
|
GMT II C
No thinking about it - superior!
__________________
Present: 116710LN SS GMT-Master II C Past: 16610 SS Sub Date |
21 March 2008, 11:46 AM | #25 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
IMHO, the LV Sub is a second rolex to add to your collection. if it's strictly between the two I would go with the GMTII-c, which is more versatile.
best, dan |
21 March 2008, 12:06 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: State College PA
Posts: 1,694
|
Go for the GMT II. Sorry, I'm just not crazy over the green.
|
21 March 2008, 12:06 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Felly
Location: Washington State
Watch: SS Daytona/GV
Posts: 2,998
|
I went with the LV because it smiled at me and then started laughing!
Good luck with your decision. |
21 March 2008, 12:11 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
|
GMT gets my vote, unless you want to compare the SD and GMT, then the SD would probably win
__________________
Daytona 116520 |
21 March 2008, 04:37 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 386
|
Kurt's right on the money. Buy the one you like the most, the winners of this poll won't be wearing the watch, You will! Best of luck, Jonathan
|
21 March 2008, 04:40 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 386
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.