The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

View Poll Results: 50th anniversary submariner or GMT master II?
Submariner 37 37.37%
GMT Master II 62 62.63%
Voters: 99. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 March 2008, 01:41 AM   #1
angelina
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2
50th Anniversary Submariner or GMT Master II????

I am interested to know what most men would like best between these two - I am not a Rolex expert - and I think they are both beautiful in their own way... which one holds the most prestige? - or value? - so to speak???? thank you!!!! need to choose between the two asap, so any advice would be so helpful.
angelina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 01:50 AM   #2
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Welcome to TRF!

It's a matter of taste and personal preference. I have owned both models, but I for my part would prefer the Sub Date LV. At least to me, the SS GMT IIc turned out to be too blingy for my liking.

Yes, the new GMT IIc has a very nice updated bracelet with solid centre links and (socalled) "improved" clasp but I just like the OLD Oyster bracelet better, despite it having the old-style clasp on non-solid centre links. The old Oyster bracelet is proven by time and is a very well-made bracelet, indeed.

The ceramic bezel might be cool, too, but still I for my part prefer the old-style anodized Alumium bezel insert to the ceramic one. IF you damage the ceramic bezel insert, you would also have to pay a lot to have it exchange for a new one. A complete ceramic bezel including insert costs a wopping 1,324 US $ and the ceramic bezel INSERT on its own costs US $ 734! Unlike the old-style bezel insert which can be exchanged for around 50 US $.

But I suggest you try them both on and go for the one that appeals most to you. You cannot go wrong with either!

Best of luck!

Please post pics of the model you choose.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 01:52 AM   #3
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
You really can't go wrong with either choice. But I am more of a Sub fan so I chose the Sub

Good luck

Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:00 AM   #4
mdx77
"TRF" Member
 
mdx77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
Welcome to TRF! Had the same dilema a few months back......opted to get the LV myself! Good luck with your decision.....these polls are fun but by no means take it for picking YOUR watch! Which one smiles back at you?!










P.S. > waiting for Basil myself to see if they do indeed come out with a ceramic Pepsi!!!!
__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV
mdx77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:37 AM   #5
angelina
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2
pictures posted

here are the pics of what I can choose from... i have both in my possession and have to choose one! I know it is a matter of preference... but is there one that is more special?
Attached Images
   
angelina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:45 AM   #6
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Welcome to TRF, Angelina......I'd go with the new GMT-II any day.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:45 AM   #7
seantk
"TRF" Member
 
seantk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by angelina View Post
here are the pics of what I can choose from... i have both in my possession and have to choose one! I know it is a matter of preference... but is there one that is more special?
The GMT costs $6800 and the Sub LV (anniversary) is $6225. Seriously they are both great watches. If you prefer the way one looks over the other one than get it. If you are buying it for someone other than youself, I am sure they would like either one. But if you are still unsure then perhaps you should ask that person.

Personally, I would be elated if someone would give me either one of those watches.

Sean

EDIT - Give me the GMT. It has the improved clasp, improved movement, the maxi dial and the new ceramic bezel.
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau
seantk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:45 AM   #8
mdx77
"TRF" Member
 
mdx77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Kurt
Location: Philly Burbs!!
Posts: 3,296
I went w/ my LV b/c of the RBR (see pic below). Good luck and have fun deciding!

__________________
“This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the BLUE pill - the story ends; you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the RED pill - you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

Rolex Submariner 116610LV Hulk | Rolex GMT 16710 Pepsi | Omega Speedmaster “Speedy Tuesday” | Tudor Black Bay 79220R “ETA Rose” | Tudor Pelagos Blue Dial | Rolex Submariner Yellow Gold 116618LB | Rolex Milgauss “Z-Blue” 116400GV
mdx77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:48 AM   #9
McQ
"TRF" Member
 
McQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 72
I would go with the LV Sub. I don't care for the new GMTIIc but I do like the now discontinued model.
McQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 02:50 AM   #10
doc_colton
"TRF" Member
 
doc_colton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 825
Tough choice for me, I'm not too wild about Rolex's redesign with the ceramic bezel on the GMT, and I still don't know what the hell Rolex was thinking with that green bezel on the Sub. (sorry LV owners, I just don't like it). Having said that if I had to choose I would go with the GMT.
__________________
doc_colton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 04:22 AM   #11
topcat30093
"TRF" Member
 
topcat30093's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Welcome to TRF, Angelina......I'd go with the new GMT-II any day.

JJ
That makes 2
__________________
topcat30093 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 04:25 AM   #12
Bobareno
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
I like the GMT
Bobareno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 04:41 AM   #13
cbrenthus
"TRF" Member
 
cbrenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brandon
Location: FL
Watch: ing my second hand
Posts: 869
I say GMT-IIc. It is every bit as usable as the sub and then some. They both have dates and more water resistance than anyone would need. BUT, the GMT also has the 24 hour hand and just enough bling. Its like a cross between a sub and SS daytona!
cbrenthus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 07:49 AM   #14
cully
"TRF" Member
 
cully's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Paul
Location: Lincolnshire UK
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 775
I say this one........but then I would!

Cheers Paul
Attached Images
 
__________________
cully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:08 AM   #15
haakon59
"TRF" Member
 
haakon59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,571
Both are great choices. However, I think the "better" one to pick is the GMT II because of it's updated case and enhanced bracelet. Right now it is a hot item and slightly harder to find. For right now, I would rate it as the best choice.
haakon59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:09 AM   #16
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Man, ...... tough choice. Uh,.....humm.......OK,...no wait....

This One!!

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:10 AM   #17
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Voted for gmt master II
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:35 AM   #18
DSJ
"TRF" Member
 
DSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
I voted Submariner, but didn't see the two watches. Between the GREEN Submariner and the GMT2C, I would change my vote to the latter, as it is more versatile with wardrobe, IMO. Oh, and welcome to TRF. There are some great guys and gals here!
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches.
16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II,
2552.80 SMP
DSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:40 AM   #19
krattzz
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC, Philly.
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 695
I had the same two when making my choice. I went to the AD and the GMT won the smile test. The green sub would be a great second watch for me but the GMT was my first.

Now that I have the bug. I am either going for the white dial explorer II or the SS Daytona that I am on the list for.

Good luck and welcome as this is an awesome place.....because of awesome people!
krattzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 08:42 AM   #20
somefun
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2
Can't go wrong with either. I have the IIc but wouldn't mind also owning the LV.
somefun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 09:17 AM   #21
PhilM
"TRF" Member
 
PhilM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
The Sub for me
PhilM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 09:26 AM   #22
pwrslider
"TRF" Member
 
pwrslider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
WHAT IS UP with all of this choosing stuff??? Don't you know I'm in a delicate spot right now....seriously jonein' for a GMT iic...........

ok.....well, this isn't about me I guess..........BUT.....there is no way I could chose between the two. I think if I had both in front of me....my head would blow up....then I'd probably grab the GMT....no no.... the LV....uhh wait... the GMT........yeah the GMT.

PS. I'm in no position to help!
pwrslider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 10:21 AM   #23
johnnybravo1210
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: usa
Posts: 140
if its the LV then the Sub if not then the GMT II but not black
johnnybravo1210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 11:42 AM   #24
nsolga
"TRF" Member
 
nsolga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sonoma Co., CA
Watch: GMTIIc
Posts: 798
GMT II C

No thinking about it - superior!
__________________
Present:
116710LN SS GMT-Master II C

Past:
16610 SS Sub Date
nsolga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 11:46 AM   #25
unclesallie
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
unclesallie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
IMHO, the LV Sub is a second rolex to add to your collection. if it's strictly between the two I would go with the GMTII-c, which is more versatile.
best, dan
unclesallie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 12:06 PM   #26
diversified
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: State College PA
Posts: 1,694
Go for the GMT II. Sorry, I'm just not crazy over the green.
diversified is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 12:06 PM   #27
Felly Jr.
"TRF" Member
 
Felly Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Felly
Location: Washington State
Watch: SS Daytona/GV
Posts: 2,998
I went with the LV because it smiled at me and then started laughing!



Good luck with your decision.
Felly Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 12:11 PM   #28
timackerman
"TRF" Member
 
timackerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Tim
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,117
GMT gets my vote, unless you want to compare the SD and GMT, then the SD would probably win
__________________
Daytona 116520
timackerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 04:37 PM   #29
wanasub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 386
Kurt's right on the money. Buy the one you like the most, the winners of this poll won't be wearing the watch, You will! Best of luck, Jonathan
wanasub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 March 2008, 04:40 PM   #30
wanasub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 386
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdx77 View Post
I went w/ my LV b/c of the RBR (see pic below). Good luck and have fun deciding!

Great pic Kurt! I love the rbr. Nothing "blingy" about it. Jonathan
wanasub is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.