The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watches (Non-Rolex) Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 September 2014, 01:43 PM   #1
Rollei
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 11
Will Smart Watch like Apple take over Rolex in luxury market segment?

Apple is a well known brand like Rolex. After seeing Apple Watch with so many customize template, I'm sure it wouldn't take long to see a classic Submariner dial appear on an Apple watch. There might be an third party apps that you can download into your smart watch along with all the Rolex classic dials plus matching hands. With the correct programming, the second hand can either run 8 beat per second or customize to a smooth sweeping motion.

The Swiss watch industries do not feel the Apple Watch will take over their market segment. To me, it feels like RIM, Nokia or Motorola failed to response with a new product to compete with Apple before it's too late.

I think the younger generation will love tech stuff more. As they grow older, they perceive Apple or other vintage smart watch has a higher value than an old inaccurate analog watch. Our Rolex collections may soon be a paper weight in the next three generations. Who knows?
Rollei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:49 PM   #2
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Not even close. Apple boondoggle imho. The one I own is just plain annoying (MetaWatch).
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:52 PM   #3
pacific17
"TRF" Member
 
pacific17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Owie
Location: MNL/SFO
Watch: G-Shock DW003
Posts: 1,504
Nope..
__________________
pacific17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:54 PM   #4
jack81
"TRF" Member
 
jack81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: planet rolex
Posts: 1,728
You must be joking
jack81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:57 PM   #5
westsideclock
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 252
I don't know about mechanical watches, but Apple will probably snag some of the digital watch segment.
westsideclock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 01:59 PM   #6
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
Lol what a silly question.

This is a nice photos which demonstrates why that won't happen.
__________________
newb watch collector
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:00 PM   #7
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
i'll buy one to compliment my iphone and apps etc. but not replace my rolex watch. the upper $2k range swiss makers need not worry just yet.

if i were a quartz lcd company like suunto or a citizen and invicta, i may be worried.

but really, who knows? one things for sure, if you have an iphone, you're probably going to buy an iwatch if you're a watch person or not.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:13 PM   #8
TSts
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: So-Cal USA
Posts: 1,067
I'd consider the Apple Watch a convenience item, not a luxury item. So, no is my answer to your question.
__________________

116710LN
116300blro
TSts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:21 PM   #9
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSts View Post
I'd consider the Apple Watch a convenience item, not a luxury item. So, no is my answer to your question.
But it will come in gold... Truthfully can you imagine a gold 1st generation iPhone, how valuable that would be?...melted for only its gold value.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:31 PM   #10
RollieVerde
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
I think in time the "younger generation" is going to get tired of never escaping from computer screens and computer interfaces, and embrace old analog technology. They will do this because so much computerware is soulless crap, and they will want to be different from the masses. It will become a new type of cool.
RollieVerde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:45 PM   #11
Silvio Mosiello
"TRF" Member
 
Silvio Mosiello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Miami/NY
Watch: the shoes.
Posts: 3,482
No. But they have potential to easily take up market share of digital watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Silvio Mosiello is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:49 PM   #12
Rogdogg
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Rogdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by RollieVerde View Post
I think in time the "younger generation" is going to get tired of never escaping from computer screens and computer interfaces, and embrace old analog technology. They will do this because so much computerware is soulless crap, and they will want to be different from the masses. It will become a new type of cool.
I would agree with this. The Samsung and other smart watch users are already getting bored. The same will happen with the apple watch. It is just new for the apple user so they are excited about it. I think given time people will get sick and tired of having to upgrade every year or two (max) to stay up-to-date. Smart phones are becoming essential in todays world. Smart watches are not. I can see, given some time, it may even help sales of quartz type watches as people get sick and tired of always being connected and look for a regular nice watch to wear, that leaves them alone and tells the time. Just my 2 cents.
Rogdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:52 PM   #13
MP5
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
MP5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: ATX
Posts: 2,886
People are dumb that is all
MP5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 02:56 PM   #14
onlysteel
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 246
This watch is a fad - like those google glasses. It will be over soon. These tech companies are running out of ideas so they are producing trash to see what sticks. As far as overtaking Rolex, yes it will happen ... it will happen the day when a a gold fish will be able to attack and kill a killer whale...
onlysteel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:01 PM   #15
kryten2001
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 283
That is not a watch.
kryten2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:16 PM   #16
msdaytona
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 385
Never. Two very different markets
msdaytona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:19 PM   #17
Route 66
"TRF" Member
 
Route 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
Who wants a watch that you'd have to remember to charge nearly every single day??
Route 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:25 PM   #18
Dr.Smellody
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,417
No
Dr.Smellody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 03:47 PM   #19
carreramay
"TRF" Member
 
carreramay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Phoenix
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
one things for sure, if you have an iphone, you're probably going to buy an iwatch if you're a watch person or not.

I wouldn't bet on that. $350 for a watch that will be obsolete in a year, needs to be charged every night and tethered to your iPhone. Don't see the attraction for anyone except fan boys and geeks.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
carreramay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:13 PM   #20
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by kryten2001 View Post
That is not a watch.
yup
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:18 PM   #21
Degas
"TRF" Member
 
Degas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Middle
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by shnxx View Post
lol what a silly question.

This is a nice photos which demonstrates why that won't happen.
316l ???
Degas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:28 PM   #22
Mercman1
"TRF" Member
 
Mercman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saudi Arabia
Posts: 186
Claude Biver says it perfectly...

http://www.businessinsider.com/jean-...ampaign=buffer


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mercman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:38 PM   #23
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Smart watches are competing with smart phones more than they are luxury mechanical watches because the iwatch requires the iphone to function and some people will simply not choose to have the watch when anything it can do is available on the phone they already must have anyway. And once they become independently functional they have a real problem because due to their size limitations (screen size and being able to cram as much electronics into a way smaller package) they will likely never be able to perform like the phone. Electronic sophistication aside, Just the screen size is a big obstacle. In case you haven't noticed, cell phone keep getting bigger - even Apple followed the market on this instead of leading it. It's tough to find even a 4" screen in a higher end phone anymore.

A Rolex is an aspirational purchase, something a smart watch will never be. Let's keep in mind that a Rolex is not an entry level time piece and is rarely the first watch a person buys.

To the extent that smart watches get more young people to start wearing watches, it will be a good thing in the long run for the prestige brands.

And BTW, I think some underestimate just how many young people still aspire to have a nice car, a big house, and a Rolex. I'm talking about kids that have plans to accomplish things in their lives, and there are a great many of them.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:51 PM   #24
style88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 195
No way that the apple watch is going to take over Rolex.

Just think about it..Rolex has been around for more than a century and during that time, it has seen so many technological gadgets come and go. And Rolex is still as strong as ever.

I believe Rolex is not even battling an eyelid over Apple watch.
style88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:56 PM   #25
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Thay are not in the same segment. BTW I will never go near an iwatch, or whatever it will be called.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 04:58 PM   #26
BNA/LION
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,658
Will Smart Watch like Apple take over Rolex in luxury market segment?

Never.
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 05:02 PM   #27
shnxx
"TRF" Member
 
shnxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
Quote:
Originally Posted by Degas View Post
316l ???
apparently.

is that good?
__________________
newb watch collector
shnxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 05:18 PM   #28
rg9390
"TRF" Member
 
rg9390's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Sydney, HK
Watch: BB58 Blue
Posts: 471
I might buy one, but I will probably not wear it as often as intended.

Maybe a good watch to go travelling, and pretty much that's all.
__________________
Patek Philippe | Audemars Piguet | Vacheron Constantin | Rolex | Tudor | Grand Seiko | Baume & Mercier | Bamford London | Studio Underd0g | Swatch x Omega | Swatch x Blancpain | Casio
rg9390 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 05:46 PM   #29
Scoobs
"TRF" Member
 
Scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: David
Location: Sydney
Watch: Daytona & Sub C
Posts: 206
I find it somewhat ironic that the "old fashioned", older technology, mechanical watch has a longer power reserve than the latest technology has to offer.....
Scoobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2014, 05:50 PM   #30
tudorwatches
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Suisse
Posts: 411
What a question...
tudorwatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.