ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 October 2014, 06:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: New York City
Posts: 110
|
I cannot decide, subc no date or explorer 1
I love both, can only have one, I'm a hairstylist, love the classic style of the sub no date, love the minimalism of the explorer1, I want something I can beat up and not worry about it. Sub is more sporty where as explorer is more dressy...
Help any thoughts ? |
2 October 2014, 06:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
I have owned both and the Submariner would be my pick.
The Explorer is a fantastic watch, but there is just something about a Sub:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
2 October 2014, 06:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Sub C is more versatile IMO. I have one and I could easily where it every day every where. The E1 is a great watch, but it's too subtle sometimes.
__________________
'The best watch out there is the one you like the most' |
2 October 2014, 06:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
Subc
|
2 October 2014, 06:44 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mexico City
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 262
|
I would go for the SubC
|
2 October 2014, 06:56 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: john
Location: ireland
Watch: Rolex ,PP
Posts: 701
|
I had a exp 1 ,for 9 months ,,, beautiful watch , just something missing , hard to discribe really ,, traded it for sub nd. ,, couldnt be happier ,, no regrets
|
2 October 2014, 07:02 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 266
|
I have both (Sub 5513 + Explorer 114270) and so should you!
|
2 October 2014, 07:08 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,417
|
I wouldn't hesitate...Get the Sub!
|
2 October 2014, 07:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
Explorer.
|
2 October 2014, 07:18 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Very Far Away
Posts: 579
|
Sub c is a dive watch. Don't get it if you don't dive. The Explorer is a classic all-around timepiece, and built to take punishment. It's perfect.
|
2 October 2014, 07:27 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Land of Adventure
Watch: Guess?
Posts: 461
|
<----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
2 October 2014, 07:27 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
If you want people to know you're wearing a Rolex, go for the Sub. The Explorer is far more subtle. In terms of sporty or dressy, they're equal. I recommend the Explorer because there are likely to be far, far fewer of them. I wonder what the numbers are...?
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
2 October 2014, 07:29 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
size ,,,,, try both , think for a while , buy the one you cant put down ,,,, buy pre owned and you may just be able to stretch both for the price of either new ,,, or a little more ,, hows that for an idea
|
2 October 2014, 07:34 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
|
Spot on.
__________________
Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520 |
2 October 2014, 07:36 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 350
|
SubC first and then the Explorer 1.
|
2 October 2014, 07:50 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
SubC easily.
|
2 October 2014, 07:56 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 7
|
I have the same problem every morning...😎
Now seriously, both are icons, blend perfectly in any environment and are heavy duty tool watches so whatever you decide you will be happy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 October 2014, 07:59 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PNW USA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 516
|
I've personally had both and I've personally sold both.
Sorry i'm no help lol |
2 October 2014, 08:10 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: SoCal & Jakarta
Watch: ROLEX, AP, and PP
Posts: 916
|
Sub c no date
|
2 October 2014, 08:12 AM | #20 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Either is a fantastic choice
|
2 October 2014, 08:16 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: robday
Location: Texas
Watch: 16710 GMT Coke
Posts: 105
|
Ok, so not trying to be silly here, but as a hairstylist, you may at some time or another need to use the bezel on the Sub to check on elapsed time (under dryer; since applying color; etc), especially if you have multiple clients at once...just a thought.
|
2 October 2014, 08:18 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
I vote Sub, but I'm considering the Exp I as my next.
|
2 October 2014, 08:20 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gone
Posts: 217
|
Explorer hands down. Larger dial, wears flatter, and dresses up more nicely than a sub.
|
2 October 2014, 09:23 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Willie
Location: Parkland,Fl.
Posts: 4,829
|
Sub
|
2 October 2014, 09:25 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
2 October 2014, 09:32 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: colin
Location: Maryland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 287
|
Sub
|
2 October 2014, 10:53 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Subc
|
2 October 2014, 11:06 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
|
I love both, but I would get a Sub way before I would get the Explorer.
|
2 October 2014, 11:15 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Both great watches! They are two of my favorites!
|
2 October 2014, 11:15 AM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
|
Left with a similar choice back in May I chose one. Can't regret the decision I made. Definitely the right choice. It is just such a Rolex icon; no-one should be with out one. BTW, how many threads are you going to ask this question in; this isn't the first one. Try checking some of the other threads on the same subject you started.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.