ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 March 2015, 02:44 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Kevin
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Explorer & JLC MC
Posts: 77
|
Explorer in the Cards
Hi all,
I recently developed an itch to buy an Omega AT, but a few members and some fantastic photos reminded me of my old flame - the Explorer. So I did some digging and found out that an AD I've purchased from before has a pre-owned 114270. It's a Y serial, so they place it circa 2002. I was able to check the watch out in person, and it appears to be in fantastic shape. Better yet, before placing it up for sale the AD sent it back to Rolex for a service. On top of that, the price seems good based on comparable posts on the sales corners of various forums. So, do I take the plunge? Does it sound perfect? I worry that if I don't pick it up sooner, it's just going to get harder and harder to find, and more expensive too. I'm also curious if there were any changes to the 114270 over the course of it's manufacturing (2001-2009 as far as I can tell). The only one I know about is the addition of the rehaut at some point. Has the movement (3130) remained identical? Any other changes? I'll end this post with a photo I snapped before placing it on layaway. Thanks for looking, everyone. |
4 March 2015, 03:52 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
That's a real beauty...sounds like a good match if you want it.
I wouldn't worry about any 'upgrades' you would be missing out on...the only significant thing I can think of that happened to the EXP was the change of size to the case size of 39mm...so unless you would rather have the larger size, then it sounds like you are all set. |
4 March 2015, 05:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: UK
Watch: Tudor Ranger
Posts: 1,613
|
I traded in an AT for a 114270. The Exp 1 is the way to go.
|
6 March 2015, 05:28 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Kevin
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Explorer & JLC MC
Posts: 77
|
Thanks for the feedback, guys. I definitely feel myself gravitation toward jumping on it. The 36mm size works well for me, as I am fairly slim and have a small wrist. I think it's the perfect balance of sporty and classy. Here's another shot...
|
6 March 2015, 05:29 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Kevin
Location: PA, USA
Watch: Explorer & JLC MC
Posts: 77
|
Lume is looking great, too...
|
6 March 2015, 05:32 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Watch: Only the 114060
Posts: 380
|
I love mine. It flies under most people's radar, which I like.
|
6 March 2015, 05:56 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: London - UK
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,249
|
If I go for a Rolex again it will be an Explorer 1.
|
6 March 2015, 09:28 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Davey
Location: Australia
Watch: 1st or 2nd
Posts: 89
|
You will not regret. The 36mm explorers are classic and elegant, with robustness to boot.
|
6 March 2015, 10:22 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I bought my Y series Explorer 1 in 2004 and love it. Came back last year from RSC from it's second service.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
6 March 2015, 10:34 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
|
The Exp 1 is a great watch. Sounds like you found a keeper.
|
6 March 2015, 10:42 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Gary
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270 216570
Posts: 707
|
My 214270 (39mm) version has a 3132 movement which has the parachrom hairspring and paraflex shock absorbers. The hairspring is said to be anti magnetic and the shock absorbers are supposed to provide additional protection. How much difference there truly is and how much is marketing, I have no idea. My wrist is barely 7" and I can get away with wearing a 42mm watch but frankly, the 39mm Explorer feels a lot more comfortable. The Explorer also looks great on other bands but the ss bracelet with the Easylink is superb. If for no other reason, I'd consider the newer Explorer for the bracelet.
|
6 March 2015, 10:44 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,091
|
Bravo, great choice imo
|
6 March 2015, 11:40 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Grant
Location: NZ
Watch: Moon
Posts: 1,719
|
Congrats on what sounds like a great find. I've owned a lot of Rolex sport models, and I love them all. But the 36mm Explorer 1 is one I keep coming back to for its unbeatable simplicity, comfort and versatility.
And to answer your question, other than the engraved rehaut, I'm not aware of any changes within the reference. Cheers, -GW |
6 March 2015, 11:42 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
That's a great watch Kevin!
|
6 March 2015, 12:37 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: California
Posts: 13
|
There isn't much difference between the two movements. I read on another thread that when you send the 3130 in for service they use the new 3132 parts. I would go with whichever you like more.
|
6 March 2015, 01:05 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
Awesome watch!
|
6 March 2015, 01:22 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,098
|
My favorite (relatively) modern rolex
|
6 March 2015, 02:12 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Ken
Location: New Mexico
Watch: GMT & DJ
Posts: 416
|
You will definitely enjoy it!
|
6 March 2015, 02:30 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 360
|
Good choice!
|
6 March 2015, 05:41 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Texas USA
Posts: 5
|
Can't go wrong with Explorer 1
|
8 March 2015, 02:00 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Brad
Location: Indiana
Watch: -aholics anonymous
Posts: 1,589
|
Go for it.
|
9 March 2015, 11:49 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Tony
Location: Loughton UK
Watch: 16610LV no Rehault
Posts: 369
|
My Explorer 114270
Looks great on leather as well.....
|
10 March 2015, 12:21 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tokyo
Watch: cha talking about?
Posts: 2,919
|
Think you found your calling. Recently added to my collection and couldn't be happier.
|
10 March 2015, 12:32 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,164
|
Great choice Kevin. That'll be my first Rolex.
|
10 March 2015, 12:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,709
|
my first Rolex funnily enough was also a Y serial explorer I that I have had since 2003 and will never ever sell despite other superior watches in my collection. It was a gift from my parents and one I will never let go. And ofcourse was a 1st Rolex.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001 IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
Tags |
114270 , explorer , rolex |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.