ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 May 2015, 12:08 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
Trade BLNR for a GMT C 18k 2 tone or vice versa?
Are the value of these two watches roughly equal?
I'm thinking of trading my Milgauss Z Blue + some cash for a BLNR but a guy I know has offered to trade his GMT C 2 tone wanting cash equivalent to what I was wanting to spend for the BLNR It's not so much a "what would you do?" question so much as "is a GMT C 2 tone worth the same money as a BLNR?" Any thoughts, The 2 tone in question is an M serial bought new in 1998 and is like new and never polished or serviced I guess in the end what I want to know is, could I trade a BLNR clean for a GMT C 2 tone or vice versa?
__________________
Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end. Life is a cruel teacher It will give you the test first and the lesson later |
1 May 2015, 12:23 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Matt
Location: California
Posts: 553
|
I almost bought a mint 2013 116713 for 8900 right before I purchased my blnr BNIB from Adnan for about 8500. So the cermaic tt is very close in price, albeit not new. Best to use watchrecon as a price gauge. Look at a couple of different listings and the mean will be a good indicator
|
1 May 2015, 01:57 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
If it is an M serial#, it was not bought brand new in 1998. M serial# did not come out until around 2007.
Make sure you know what you are buying before doing ANY deal.
__________________
|
1 May 2015, 02:01 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
|
The difference is minimal since BLNR is very HOT now.
I would say an M-serial 116713 is worth maybe $2-300 more. Not much. Not less for sure. The only difference is TT is harder to move vs. BLNR. |
1 May 2015, 03:08 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Nanaimo, B.C.
Watch: DJ2 Blue Romans
Posts: 1,980
|
Quote:
Bought new in 08
__________________
Everything will be okay in the end. If it's not okay, it's not the end. Life is a cruel teacher It will give you the test first and the lesson later |
|
1 May 2015, 05:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: singapore
Posts: 49
|
I just sold my 2001 TT GMT c for a batman and hulk.
|
1 May 2015, 06:50 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
Well, an older TT, Z or M serial in pretty good shape is going to go around the same money and maybe a little less for a BNIB BLNR. If you compare BNIB to BNIB, however, the TT is going to be more.
|
1 May 2015, 07:09 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I would go for the ceramic TT, used price is very similar to new BLNR price.
|
1 May 2015, 12:34 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
Yes, TT is much harder to flip in the grey market compared to BLNR - one of the most sought-after models.
|
1 May 2015, 07:55 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 478
|
BLNR is just hot watch now. in the Netherlands the list price is 7850 EUR... very hard to find at AD and the Gray price is 7600 :( so almost no discount...
|
1 May 2015, 08:21 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
The values are comparable, give or take. So I would be thinking about which appeals most to you rather than market value. TT or SS?
|
1 May 2015, 08:23 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
The 116713 is stunning , I'd do it in a heart-beat
|
17 June 2015, 03:44 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver,BC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 156
|
|
17 June 2015, 10:01 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
|
18 June 2015, 03:28 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vancouver,BC
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 156
|
|
18 June 2015, 07:34 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 221
|
I looked and looked (and looked) at Rolex to see what I would like. I even wore a buddy's Batman for a few hours and it just didn't seem to work for me. But this TT was an instant love. There are two types of "value"....how much you can get for it, and how much it means to you. At the end of the day, you need to know which of the 2 will make you content. |
18 June 2015, 09:11 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
I love TT better than SS so I would get the 116713.
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
19 June 2015, 12:34 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Taiwan
Watch: Rolex BLNR
Posts: 2,308
|
|
19 June 2015, 03:27 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Europe
Watch: The White Gold Sub
Posts: 518
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.