The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 June 2015, 12:50 AM   #1
DiamondJack
"TRF" Member
 
DiamondJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
And there was nothing in the manual about this......

So it turns out marble floors and Rolex watches are not a good combination.....

Incredibly, having had a serious "butter fingers" moment and another of extreme fear......there is absolutely no damage other than the ceramic bezel.....

Clearly not ideal but could have been a lot worse.....
Attached Images
 
DiamondJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 12:51 AM   #2
00Seven
"TRF" Member
 
00Seven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Watch: Omega
Posts: 825
Ouch! Sorry to see that. I'd have it checked out by your watchmaker, or likely Rolex since it'll need a new bezel, to make sure the movement wasn't' damaged as well.
00Seven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 12:51 AM   #3
DiamondJack
"TRF" Member
 
DiamondJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
So looks like it's going to have to be this one for tonight......
Attached Images
 
DiamondJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 12:52 AM   #4
SC11
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
Ouch I feel for you fella, but like you said it could of been a lot worse!
SC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 12:52 AM   #5
phatotto
"TRF" Member
 
phatotto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Michigan
Watch: a few at a time
Posts: 218
Deff could of turned out worse!!
__________________
"Things may come to those who wait...but only the things left by those who hustle.”
-Abraham Lincoln
phatotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 12:54 AM   #6
SeaDweller50
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
The only time I take my watch off standing up is if there's a carpet underneath. Sorry about that.
SeaDweller50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:02 AM   #7
Tseg
"TRF" Member
 
Tseg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
Taking it off in the bathroom so it doesn't get wet? Sorry for your loss.
Tseg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:07 AM   #8
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Whoa, not good. Hope it gets quickly and cost effectively!
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:09 AM   #9
rootbeer7
2024 Pledge Member
 
rootbeer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
ooh, I feel your pain.
rootbeer7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:12 AM   #10
ernie2
"TRF" Member
 
ernie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Arnold
Location: New York
Watch: SD4K+BLNR
Posts: 849
Now I worry about my ceramic bezel
ernie2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:13 AM   #11
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Wasn't expecting to see that!!!
As you say Steve it good have been worse, onwards & upwards pal

Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:14 AM   #12
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
here's hoping that it's just an issue with the insert.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:17 AM   #13
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Let us know the cost of a new bezel insert. The SS is around $375.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:19 AM   #14
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,314
Wow second one ive seen this week like that
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:20 AM   #15
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
here's hoping that it's just an issue with the insert.
I know what you mean Cru but as we all know a movement servicing would be cheaper than a new insert.

Just spit-balling but if this was a 16713 instead of a 116713 would the OP even feel the need to send it in for service?
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:24 AM   #16
Thegr8one
"TRF" Member
 
Thegr8one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 79090 & 79180
Posts: 227
I'm probably in the minority here but I think it looks pretty good without the insert. It has an industrial look going for it. And yes, I understand no insert removes the GMT functionality.
Thegr8one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:25 AM   #17
Naz737
"TRF" Member
 
Naz737's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Matt
Location: FL, USA
Watch: Sub 16610T
Posts: 715
Noooo! Sorry dood! Hope the movement is ok!
__________________
16610
Naz737 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:27 AM   #18
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by wantonebad View Post
I know what you mean Cru but as we all know a movement servicing would be cheaper than a new insert.

not sure, but, i would have thought a movement service and/or replacing the bezel would be much more expensive. i would be suprised if the insert itself is dramatically more than the 350 for the LN ceramic insert, no?
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:30 AM   #19
jhe888
"TRF" Member
 
jhe888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Posts: 377
Youch.

Query: Is the ceramic insert an improvement?

Ceramic is very resistant to scratching, perhaps making it better for lighter use, but a metal insert will not break, even if it scratches a bit.
jhe888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:30 AM   #20
ArcticMoose
"TRF" Member
 
ArcticMoose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
That sucks!
ArcticMoose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:34 AM   #21
Director EDTF
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Director EDTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Nelson
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 2,466
Ouch! Good thing you have a spare!
Director EDTF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 01:35 AM   #22
SWISSAHOLICS
"TRF" Member
 
SWISSAHOLICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
Oh no, this is the second one this week.
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV

"The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
SWISSAHOLICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:04 AM   #23
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
So sorry.......Please post pics when you make it whole again.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:11 AM   #24
wantonebad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
wantonebad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
Sorry, Cru, I don't think I was very clear, all I was trying to say was probably nothing wrong with the movement and if it wasn't ceramic there would be no harm no foul.
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal...
on a fairly irrelevant social media site
that falsely inflates my fragile ego"
wantonebad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:15 AM   #25
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhe888 View Post
Youch.

Query: Is the ceramic insert an improvement?

Ceramic is very resistant to scratching, perhaps making it better for lighter use, but a metal insert will not break, even if it scratches a bit.
Well IMHO if you want a bling factor then perhaps ceramic is a yes,but IMHO I cannot see any real advantage in ceramic for today's mainly pampered Rolex watches.Many say the aluminium ones used to scratch and fade,yet I can only speak for the black inserts on my watches well over 20 years old, and compared to today's Rolex wearers had a extremely hard life. Working as real tool watches for many years,yes replaced one insert in all that time cost just then £27 and a DIY fit and my watches still look good today just with normal service.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:17 AM   #26
lmcgbaj
"TRF" Member
 
lmcgbaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
Oh man. Sorry to see that but I am sure it will come back like new from RSC. I would do a full service while you are at it and get back a new watch. Kills two birds and you get something to look forward to,.
lmcgbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:17 AM   #27
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by wantonebad View Post
Sorry, Cru, I don't think I was very clear, all I was trying to say was probably nothing wrong with the movement and if it wasn't ceramic there would be no harm no foul.
I was wondering that, did the ceramic breaking provide an outlet for energy to dissipate protecting the rest of the watch or would an aluminum insert have had less damage overall?

I never want to find out.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:17 AM   #28
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by wantonebad View Post
Sorry, Cru, I don't think I was very clear, all I was trying to say was probably nothing wrong with the movement and if it wasn't ceramic there would be no harm no foul.


aaah, ok,

personally, i tend to think that any force strong enough to crack the ceramic would dent/damage aluminum, too.

but, then, i am in the "ceramic is better" camp.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:20 AM   #29
bdex75
"TRF" Member
 
bdex75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Well IMHO if you want a bling factor then perhaps ceramic is a yes,but IMHO I cannot see any real advantage in ceramic for today's mainly pampered Rolex watches.Many say the aluminium ones used to scratch and fade,yet I can only speak for the black inserts on my watches well over 20 years old, and compared to today's Rolex wearers had a extremely hard life. Working as real tool watches for many years,yes replaced one insert in all that time cost just then £27 and a DIY fit and my watches still look good today just with normal service.

I think the scratches, dings and fade give them that vintage character at some point. Not. White fan of ceramic inserts but still have one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bdex75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2015, 02:20 AM   #30
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Oh man, Steve...sorry that this happened.

Hoping all is resolved soon to your satisfaction.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.