The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 August 2015, 12:34 AM   #1
oyster1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 35
New Sub losing 5.5 seconds per day...

Not what you would expect one month after purchase.....been gradually losing more each week and now is approx -5.5s each day which is rather significant and outside COSC parameters. Hopefully will be resolved by regulating, but shame (and disappointing) to have to send it in so soon though!!
oyster1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 12:37 AM   #2
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Try this...
Attached Images
 
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 12:45 AM   #3
Sublover2166
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivek View Post
Try this...
Most say this type of regulation is irrelevant with today's new Rolex watches. This paperwork does not even come with a new watch and I don't know how long since it has but has probably been many years.
Sublover2166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 12:49 AM   #4
Snow-Dweller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Snow-Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublover2166 View Post
Most say this type of regulation is irrelevant with today's new Rolex watches. This paperwork does not even come with a new watch and I don't know how long since it has but has probably been many years.
It works well on my 216570
__________________
.
The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings...
———————————————————————————————————

.
16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D.
Snow-Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 01:12 AM   #5
oyster1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Yes, fully wound, worn all day etc. The 'simple regulating' process makes no difference. So, I guess it's going in...
oyster1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 01:17 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
Yes, fully wound, worn all day etc. The 'simple regulating' process makes no difference. So, I guess it's going in...
While it is a nuisance, when you have it regulated it will likely be a second or two on the plus side; I prefer that to one on the minus side.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 01:22 AM   #7
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
Yes, fully wound, worn all day etc. The 'simple regulating' process makes no difference. So, I guess it's going in...
Myself would not even think about getting the back off for in the real world less than 2 seconds out of 86400 in a day.Give your watch at least a few months of wearing before even thinking about regulation.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 05:27 AM   #8
Anthon
"TRF" Member
 
Anthon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublover2166 View Post
Most say this type of regulation is irrelevant with today's new Rolex watches. This paperwork does not even come with a new watch and I don't know how long since it has but has probably been many years.
My Explorer loses two seconds overnight with the crown up, gains a second with the crown down. On the wrist it gains haf a second during the day. So there is definitely still a variation in time gaining/loosing according to position.

It is also already pointed out that COSC +6/-4 is an average. Not a daily measure. So a question to the OP: how did you measure this 5.5 seconds loss of time?
Anthon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 12:42 AM   #9
Sublover2166
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
Not what you would expect one month after purchase.....been gradually losing more each week and now is approx -5.5s each day which is rather significant and outside COSC parameters. Hopefully will be resolved by regulating, but shame (and disappointing) to have to send it in so soon though!!
Have you wound the crown a full 40 turns? And then worn the watch for at least 10 hours every day? If it is fully wound and still loses this much time, yes it has to go in for regulation.
Sublover2166 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 01:11 AM   #10
gould86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 5
I had the same issue with my brand new 114060. Took it in for a regulation and now it keeps time perfectly.

Something to do with it running fast when fully wound.
gould86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 01:45 AM   #11
Bfd70
"TRF" Member
 
Bfd70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
Isn't the standard +4 -6?

Also, i have noticed there seems to be a few week break in period. My Sub is currently +9 a week. It started at + 15 a week. In advance, no, the 6 seconds doesn't matter to me. I just find it interesting.
Bfd70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 02:44 AM   #12
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bfd70 View Post
Isn't the standard +4 -6?

Also, i have noticed there seems to be a few week break in period. My Sub is currently +9 a week. It started at + 15 a week. In advance, no, the 6 seconds doesn't matter to me. I just find it interesting.
No the COSC spec is that the movement should perform to a AVERAGE of -4+6 seconds over any 24 hour period.And in the first 10 days of testing the movement could vary up to 10 seconds out of any single 24 hour period and still pass the COSC test.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 06:30 AM   #13
anothernewphone
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
No the COSC spec is that the movement should perform to a AVERAGE of -4+6 seconds over any 24 hour period.And in the first 10 days of testing the movement could vary up to 10 seconds out of any single 24 hour period and still pass the COSC test.
If the watch is consistently running 5.5 seconds slow per day, that IS outside of COSC specs.
anothernewphone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 06:05 PM   #14
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,061
Quote:
Originally Posted by anothernewphone View Post
If the watch is consistently running 5.5 seconds slow per day, that IS outside of COSC specs.
Quite true but the main word is consistency if its consistent then its a extremely accurate watch and all that might be needed is simple regulation.But even after regulation on a machine to lets say +2 seconds over 24 hours.This dont mean it will always perform daily to exactly +2 seconds while on the wrist.Gravity affects mechanical watches the most that's why they are tested in 5 different positions at the COSC.And in those different positions there will be slight tiny deviations in the timekeeping.Remember this the escapement of a mechanical watch in 24 hours pushes the gears 432,000 times and a day has 86,400 seconds.Many things happen to the movement while on the wrist its constantly affected by the earth's gravity, metal expansion and contraction, temperature variations, subtle changes in lubrication and friction, shocks, and so on.The fact is that no purely mechanical watch made at any price will keep perfect time, very close yes but perfect no.Myself would always like a movement running a slight gain than minus, what I am saying never rush out to get the back off just for a second or so, let watch get used to the owners wearing habits first..
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 02:02 AM   #15
Globule
"TRF" Member
 
Globule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: G. L. O. Bule
Location: UK
Watch: out for snakes.
Posts: 271
As above I recommend a few weeks break in. My wife's DJ was well out of COSC and although it improved over a few weeks, I still had to have it regulated at RSC. Now it is running consistently at +2.
__________________
House guarded by Rottweiler three days a week ... guess which days.
Globule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 02:03 AM   #16
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
You will be glad you had it regulated after it is back on your wrist.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 02:33 AM   #17
WS9D
"TRF" Member
 
WS9D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
I would hold off a bit and see if it changes. If after 3 months it's still off, then maybe send it in.
WS9D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 06:49 AM   #18
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
Yes, this is true but the testing was done before assembly on the movement alone. I sent a watch back to RSC for running +11. It cost me money for shipping; the question is if -5.5 sec/day is worth the cost of the shipping and absence of the watch. My new watch is running at about +5 and it's not going anywhere.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 06:54 AM   #19
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,044
I wouldn't necessarily be worried about the 5 seconds/day if it was consistently at that spec...I would be more concerned that this number has been growing weekly. What has it been running up to this point?
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 07:11 AM   #20
oyster1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 35
It started off at around -3, then -4, then -5, and has 'settled' over the last month now at -5.5. Wouldn't be so bad of it was +5.5 !!!
oyster1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 10:07 AM   #21
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
It started off at around -3, then -4, then -5, and has 'settled' over the last month now at -5.5. Wouldn't be so bad of it was +5.5 !!!
I think I would give it some more time and see how it does the next 2-3 months.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 05:53 PM   #22
oyster1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 35
Thanks for all the feedback. Particularly like the last pun...'give it some more time' 😄 Will see how it is in a couple of months
oyster1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 09:15 AM   #23
blue lion
"TRF" Member
 
blue lion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida State!
Watch: It's just a watch.
Posts: 1,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
Not what you would expect one month after purchase.....been gradually losing more each week and now is approx -5.5s each day which is rather significant and outside COSC parameters. Hopefully will be resolved by regulating, but shame (and disappointing) to have to send it in so soon though!!
It's your watch but this wouldn't bother me at all.
blue lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 09:19 AM   #24
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,088
It wouldn't bother me at all, especially if consistent.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 09:28 AM   #25
Cabernet
"TRF" Member
 
Cabernet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: CA
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 123
Maybe a rookie question, but what are you comparing to when you say you lose or gain a couple seconds in a day?
Cabernet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 09:27 AM   #26
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
It's JUST outside. Would never think about getting it adjusted.

If it was +5.5 would it also bother you? It would be in COSC.

My Speedmaster was a consistent +10 a day over. I know it's not a COSC watch. Never bothered me. 5 years later it's now about +5. Maybe in another 5 years it will be bang on.

Wait for a few months see how you feel then.
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 06:11 PM   #27
Foxglove
"TRF" Member
 
Foxglove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: yourself
Posts: 838
Do the things the others here recommend - like being sure it's fully wound, etc. If you're wearing it normally it will be. The watch should be running within COSC out of the box. If it bothers you, get it regulated. It's not that hard. Your AD will probably just do it for you for free, if not it's minimal cost and your watch will be easily running within COSC with a quality watchsmith regulating it. I'm not sure in the UK, but in the USA I would recommend Rik Dietel, he's regulated a few of mine (Rolex and not) and all came back well within COSC specs with little positional variation.
Foxglove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2015, 11:22 PM   #28
pickerdd
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Marietta, GA
Watch: 114060
Posts: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by oyster1 View Post
Not what you would expect one month after purchase.....been gradually losing more each week and now is approx -5.5s each day which is rather significant and outside COSC parameters. Hopefully will be resolved by regulating, but shame (and disappointing) to have to send it in so soon though!!
I had the same issue with my 114060 for the first 5 or 6 months then it settled in to an average of 2 seconds (plus or minus) a day, which is within spec. I was advised by the fine folks on the forum to be patient and that advice has paid off. To put it in perspective, my quartz watches average + .3 seconds a day. I'm fine with that AND I didn't have to ship my watch to the RSC.

Just a thought.

- David
pickerdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 02:53 AM   #29
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
All of ours needed to go in to be regulated when pretty new. Due to pick my latest one up from the service centre in Kent this week. It was gaining 15 secs per day, but all within a short time before settling and doing the same again the next day. Been told one thing they've done is swap to a weaker main spring.

Both our others have been great since been regulated.
__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 September 2015, 06:28 AM   #30
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Folks do get confused over this. If a watch loses or gains the same amount every day over a week, it's very very accurate.
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.