ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 October 2015, 05:11 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: israel
Posts: 123
|
crown not flush with case
hi there - seeking out your expert advice!
The tritium on the hands and hour markers on the dail of my rolex date (1500) now longer glow in the dark (did not expect it cause after all its a 1982 model) so I had my watch maker relume them for me as a birthday present (cheaper than buying a new rolex ha.. ha..) He did a real nice job + replacing the seals on the case back and on the stem + a pressure test. my question is, the crown does not seem to sit flush 100% with the case anymore - it screws it into the tube just fine, but when the crown can no longer be twisted anymore towards the case, you can still see the last thread or two of the tube . this is something new to me - before the crown sat 100% flush with the case. could that be because the seal is new it takes some time before it "breaks in" or too much glue was used in installing the seal? I also noticed that the crown seems to unscrew a lot easier than before. i have enclosed picture. thanks. |
14 October 2015, 05:35 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
The crown is not supposed to sit flush to the case,if it did the seal in the crown head is damaged or badly worn.The main seals are inside the case and not metal to metal contact with the case.All the crown needs is just screwing down finger tight and no force is needed, one seal in the crown head the other with say twin lock crown inside the case crown tube.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
14 October 2015, 06:14 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
Case closed!
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
14 October 2015, 08:13 PM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,242
|
What Peter said. You're good to go.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
14 October 2015, 08:27 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Aj
Location: Kuwait
Watch: RM,AP,PP,RLX,PAM
Posts: 1,056
|
+1 Peter
|
14 October 2015, 10:05 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
Kobe (Peter) with the 3-point bucket from the outside!!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain |
14 October 2015, 10:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: israel
Posts: 123
|
thanks and question about polishing
ok thanks pete for the expert advice.
the old crown gasket must have been realy worn out - glad to have a new one. another question if i may - i had the watch polished. is it possible by polishing to restore the watch and bracelet to its original condition like when it was new? or no matter how well you polish it there are always remain some scratches and wear? thanks. |
14 October 2015, 10:32 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
Quote:
Polishing removes metal (albeit in very small amounts when done properly). The deeper the scratch, the more metal will need to be removed to eliminate the scratch and the more the risk of altering the original finish and shape of the watch/bracelet. Either way, once the watch is worn again, it's inevitable that a whole bunch of new scratches will appear! |
|
8 January 2016, 02:03 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Hello...same question from me and my 1982 Datejust, but perhaps some better photos (no offense to the original poster). I understand that the crown shouldn't be touching the case, but I do believe it should be further down than this? I don't see many other Datejust's with threads on the tube visible under the winding crown....
Please help! |
8 January 2016, 02:06 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
as a comparison, here's a similar DJ from Jacek's HQMilton site:
|
8 January 2016, 02:14 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
And here's a photo of the crown pulled to the 2nd (i.e. date change) position. I do think this crown tube is too long, or out too far.
Maybe there's an extra gasket inside the crown? |
8 January 2016, 02:24 AM | #12 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Quote:
|
|
8 January 2016, 02:39 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
|
Are you able to manually wind it (position 1) without the tube threads catching the crown?
If so, it's OK (but I agree it should be seated deeper). If not, you risk damaging the tube and/or crown lead thread which could cause it to cross thread... That requires replacing both the crown and tube if it happens. Maybe best to send to, or take to, a vintage watch expert to check for you. |
8 January 2016, 03:44 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Yeah, no problem winding, but it is tighter than usual and it seems to screw down with fewer rotations than I'm used to (this DJ is new to me, but I'v have many others in the past). I'm taking it to my local indy watchmaker and I'll return with an update.
thanks again for the original post and the additional help... |
8 January 2016, 10:06 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
It's possible that there are two gaskets in the crown if somebody did not carefully remove the old one when installing a new one. A watchmaker would need to take the stem out to check.
The tube can be trimmed shorter but it usually isn't done since the tiny bit of extra tube doesn't really show up unless magnified a million times..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
8 January 2016, 02:13 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
Thanks for chiming in, Larry
I showed it to my local indy watchmaker and they said, it's not a major issue, but the bigger issue is that it's pretty tight when winding and it feels like there isn't much lubrication in there...and yes, they recommend a maintenance service during which time the tube would be replaced (as it is pretty worn and gunned up). So I will wait a little while before servicing it... |
8 January 2016, 04:28 PM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Sounds like they didn't seat the tube deep enough so had to cut a longer stem which is too long.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.