ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 November 2015, 05:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Birmingham AL.
Watch: Rolex GMT IIC
Posts: 14
|
JLC Automatic Reversos
I see many manual wind Reversos on the market but not many automatic Reversos. Are automatic Reversos thought less of than the manual wind Reverso? Is it considered a less sought after movement for Reversos and a bad purchase?
|
3 November 2015, 06:29 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
|
Reverso? Must be manual.
|
3 November 2015, 06:33 AM | #3 |
TechXpert
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,639
|
|
3 November 2015, 06:45 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,970
|
Pretty much no reversos are "thought less of" or a "bad purchase".
That's your answer. |
3 November 2015, 12:26 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
Well that's good, because I like mine, it's a manual.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
3 November 2015, 12:30 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
|
|
3 November 2015, 01:17 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SF
Watch: Ex.2.
Posts: 512
|
Manual is sexy, automatic is a bore.
|
3 November 2015, 04:59 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Its like an auto Speedmaster. It just doesn't seems right.
|
3 November 2015, 05:07 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
|
4 November 2015, 03:27 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
I love the Reverso in pictures. I tried one on for the first time the other day, and it looked terrible on my wrist. Maybe I'm just not used to the case shape, but wow what a disappointment. On the bright side, I fell in love with the MUT....
|
4 November 2015, 03:36 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Quote:
I drooled over the SS MUT Moon for months in pictures and even in the case. But when I tried it on, it did nothing for me. It was a let down. Now the RG was a completely different story!
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
|
4 November 2015, 06:03 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: meeko
Location: austin, tx
Watch: gmt iic
Posts: 103
|
|
4 November 2015, 06:38 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Michael
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 1,225
|
Both fine, but do prefer manual winds in watches to include the Reverso of course
|
4 November 2015, 07:56 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
4 November 2015, 11:06 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,122
|
Agreed, manual only on a Reverso!
|
4 November 2015, 01:23 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
I love manual wind Reverso watches. Here is my 8 day GMT.
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
4 November 2015, 02:40 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
It does take some getting used to, but it's also worth noting that the strap is very important as well. I found the JLC alligator strap to be very stiff and made the watch look stupid on me, it just didn't feel right. With the Casa Fagliano strap, which is very pliable, the Reverso takes on a whole new look and feel. It's really comfortable and looks much better I think. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.