ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mikhaelj · 21 November 2015, 02:18 PM

Hi RF,

I got my heart set on this beauty a circa 1981 birth year. Number: 7102XXX (1981) Any flaws that you can point out?

timlaw · 21 November 2015, 02:34 PM

should those holes be in the lugs?

JOKING!!!

mikhaelj · 21 November 2015, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timlaw

should those holes be in the lugs?

JOKING!!!

Hahahha nice one!!!

RolexDet1298 · 21 November 2015, 02:37 PM

That's a beauty!

Lol-x · 21 November 2015, 02:38 PM

Looks Perrrrfect to me

adawil2002 · 21 November 2015, 02:39 PM

Prefer the oyster flip lock clasp. Aside from that it looks fine to me.

schinie · 21 November 2015, 03:08 PM

immaculate

TheVTCGuy · 21 November 2015, 03:15 PM

The only flaw is I don't own one!

Beautiful watch, congrats and wear it in good health.

Lordofrolex · 21 November 2015, 03:29 PM

Great looking watch

zama · 21 November 2015, 03:31 PM

That is a watch you can NEVER go wrong with. Look forward to the official incoming

sea-dweller · 21 November 2015, 03:59 PM

Looks OK, I had an 16750 and sold it, years ago.

30more · 21 November 2015, 08:14 PM

Go for it! I just got myself a 1985. Turned 30 on the 14th.

Old Geezer · 21 November 2015, 08:20 PM

Looks excellent. Buy it and enjoy it.

bayerische · 21 November 2015, 08:52 PM

Very nice find. I'm -81 too!

TheBluePrince · 21 November 2015, 09:31 PM

Looks good. Put a correct period nicely faded insert on it though.

Rebel · 21 November 2015, 10:21 PM

Flipped my GMT a while back.......regrets for sure.

Rolex Rolex · 22 November 2015, 09:29 AM

dial been refreshment ?

Loevhagen · 22 November 2015, 10:03 AM

There is a (aged) mismatch between the hands and the dial. That is however quite normal - and much better than "hands have been painted to color match the dial".

Except for that; cool watch. :)

MitchSteel · 22 November 2015, 10:04 AM

Great example

overgrower · 22 November 2015, 11:04 AM

Looks like the watch from European Watch Co? Is it the picture angle or does the bottom crown lug look thinner? Overall a clean looking 16750.

mikhaelj · 22 November 2015, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rolex Rolex

dial been refreshment ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loevhagen

There is a (aged) mismatch between the hands and the dial. That is however quite normal - and much better than "hands have been painted to color match the dial".

Except for that; cool watch. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by overgrower

Looks like the watch from European Watch Co? Is it the picture angle or does the bottom crown lug look thinner? Overall a clean looking 16750.

@RolexRolex according to the seller the dial has not been refreshed.

@loevhagen spoke to seller and seller guarantees all parts are OEM and claims this watch has not been used in its life as it should be. meaning its been taken care of. I do see your point now and took notice of the hands being not matching to the dial. Would this be a turn off?

@overgrower It is.

Thank you guys for shedding your feedback and observations. I appreciate it, especially for someone who is not experience with circa vintage rolex. I understand as well that the bezel is a replacement. I would need to find a faded one in great condition to swap. I was a able to agree with the seller on lower $6K for it it has no P&B. Over all, would you recommend to go for it? I have been hunting for a birth year GMT watch 1981 in great condition. Shall I back out due to what you have mentioned?

Xantiagib · 23 November 2015, 07:13 PM

I was going to say - "the red is too red", so a more faded one would look better.

mikhaelj · 24 November 2015, 02:29 AM

backed out on the deal sadly. The markers and hands do not match. Seller was trying to convince me that markers and hands don't necessarly patina together the same color as they are "different parts" I may be a newbie to vintage watches but won't buy for a second that hands and markers from the same year/era won't patina simultaneously. All the research Ive done and I've seen hands and markers patina the same. Plus the bezel is a serviced bezel from RSC which I am not a fan of either as it does not match the watch.

The HUNT for a GMT 1981 is still ongoing. If anyone knows of a good 1981 GMT PM please!

BIG THANKS to @springer for being my source of information. I appreciate it.

MitchSteel · 24 November 2015, 02:48 AM

Joey, I've seen original dials and hands,that have slight inconsistency in patina between the dial and hands.The dial and hands may have been lumped by different suppliers using different tritium compounds, such as binder, making them darken slightly different.
It is completely up to you to deside, but, that watch you're looking at, meets my criteria for a desirable example.Great condition of the metal, clean dial and hands.Im sure with a bit of patience, you'll find another original, clean example.
Good luck in your search

mikhaelj · 24 November 2015, 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MitchSteel

Joey, I've seen original dials and hands,that have slight inconsistency in patina between the dial and hands.The dial and hands may have been lumped by different suppliers using different tritium compounds, such as binder, making them darken slightly different.
It is completely up to you to deside, but, that watch you're looking at, meets my criteria for a desirable example.Great condition of the metal, clean dial and hands.Im sure with a bit of patience, you'll find another original, clean example.
Good luck in your search

Thank you. I agree with you the watch has an amazing condition of metal. Somehow the excitement started fading away after carefully examining it:

- Patina not matching on hands and markers. It is important to me that they do. This would we a perfect example now only if Jacek would discount the price :) https://www.rolexforums.com/showthre...light=GMT+1981

- I was going to over look the patina part but the bezel was not growing on me. Watch being 34 years old but with a bezel thats spanking new was not going to like it. It would have given me the itch.

- Have my doubts that the date wheel have been changed and updated. Numbers are slightly thinner than others I've seen from the era

If I would have gotten the watch and swapped the bezel and hands, this would have cost me a lot as well. Id rather find it all in one.

Just need to keep looking Mitch. Pls tell me I'll come across THE ONE

MitchSteel · 24 November 2015, 05:37 AM

Absolutely,bud

Now, only you will know what you want and what sings to you.
I'd personally, look for the best possible condition watch I can get at reasonable price....gotta consider both aspects,right.
As for the bezel, yeah, it's the newer one, for sure, older beat up, faded bezel inserts can be bought and installed by you in a matter of seconds.Of course dials and hands can be sourced,adding cost of course,but you can also sell the dials,hands, inserts, etc that you don't want.
That's the beauty of this hobby, the true pleasure of it is in the hunt.

Good luck, Perserverence will pay off

21 November 2015, 02:18 PM	#1
mikhaelj "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Joey Location: London Watch: 116619LB & 16000 Posts: 361	Gmt 16750 Hi RF, I got my heart set on this beauty a circa 1981 birth year. Number: 7102XXX (1981) Any flaws that you can point out? __________________ ♛ 116619LB ♛ 16000 Birth Year 1981

21 November 2015, 02:34 PM	#2
timlaw "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Tim Location: Worcestershire,UK Watch: Coke 16710 Posts: 894	should those holes be in the lugs? JOKING!!! __________________ Tim. 124060 Submariner, 16710 Coke, 16570 Black dial, Datejust 41 Wimbledon dial, Tudor Black Bay GMT, Tudor Black Bay 58 Blue, Tudor Black Bay 58 925, Tudor Prince Date Chronograph (panda dial)

21 November 2015, 02:38 PM	#5
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,587	Looks Perrrrfect to me __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

21 November 2015, 02:39 PM	#6
adawil2002 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2014 Real Name: Andrew Wilson Location: Brunswick, Maine Watch: 16550 Explorer II Posts: 1,773	Prefer the oyster flip lock clasp. Aside from that it looks fine to me. __________________ 6284 SS, 16014 SS Jubilee silver stick, 16253 TT Blue Thunderbird, 16550 SS Exp II Cream, bought in 1986, 116400GV Z-blue Milgauss, 79260 Tudor, 116660 DSSD-Blue, 116500LV Daytona White, 116710 BLNR, 326934 Blue Skydweller

21 November 2015, 03:29 PM	#9
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	Great looking watch __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

21 November 2015, 02:37 PM	#4
RolexDet1298 Banned Join Date: Feb 2015 Real Name: . Location: . Watch: 116710BLNR Posts: 85	That's a beauty!

21 November 2015, 03:08 PM	#7
schinie "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: austria Posts: 53	immaculate

21 November 2015, 03:15 PM	#8
TheVTCGuy Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Paul Location: San Diego Watch: 126619LB Posts: 21,540	The only flaw is I don't own one! Beautiful watch, congrats and wear it in good health.

21 November 2015, 03:31 PM	#10
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,808	That is a watch you can NEVER go wrong with. Look forward to the official incoming __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

21 November 2015, 03:59 PM	#11
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Looks OK, I had an 16750 and sold it, years ago. __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

21 November 2015, 08:14 PM	#12
30more "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Florida Posts: 134	Go for it! I just got myself a 1985. Turned 30 on the 14th.

21 November 2015, 08:20 PM	#13
Old Geezer "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Location: South Carolina Posts: 5,283	Looks excellent. Buy it and enjoy it.

21 November 2015, 08:52 PM	#14
bayerische "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Andreas Location: Margaritaville Watch: Smurf Posts: 19,879	Very nice find. I'm -81 too! __________________ Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

21 November 2015, 09:31 PM	#15
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081	Looks good. Put a correct period nicely faded insert on it though.

21 November 2015, 10:21 PM	#16
Rebel "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail Location: New Albany Watch: Tudor Sub 75090 Posts: 8,254	Flipped my GMT a while back.......regrets for sure. __________________ ------------------------------- Member of the Nylon Nation

22 November 2015, 09:29 AM	#17
Rolex Rolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Dubai Posts: 323	dial been refreshment ?

22 November 2015, 10:03 AM	#18
Loevhagen "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: The aperture Posts: 4,941	There is a (aged) mismatch between the hands and the dial. That is however quite normal - and much better than "hands have been painted to color match the dial". Except for that; cool watch. :)

22 November 2015, 10:04 AM	#19
MitchSteel "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: MDangerSteel Location: Canada Watch: Vintage Rolex Posts: 2,301	Great example __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel

22 November 2015, 11:04 AM	#20
overgrower "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: United States Posts: 76	Looks like the watch from European Watch Co? Is it the picture angle or does the bottom crown lug look thinner? Overall a clean looking 16750.

23 November 2015, 07:13 PM	#22
Xantiagib "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Gibraltar Posts: 203	I was going to say - "the red is too red", so a more faded one would look better.

24 November 2015, 02:29 AM	#23
mikhaelj "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Real Name: Joey Location: London Watch: 116619LB & 16000 Posts: 361	backed out on the deal sadly. The markers and hands do not match. Seller was trying to convince me that markers and hands don't necessarly patina together the same color as they are "different parts" I may be a newbie to vintage watches but won't buy for a second that hands and markers from the same year/era won't patina simultaneously. All the research Ive done and I've seen hands and markers patina the same. Plus the bezel is a serviced bezel from RSC which I am not a fan of either as it does not match the watch. The HUNT for a GMT 1981 is still ongoing. If anyone knows of a good 1981 GMT PM please! BIG THANKS to @springer for being my source of information. I appreciate it. __________________ ♛ 116619LB ♛ 16000 Birth Year 1981

24 November 2015, 02:48 AM	#24
MitchSteel "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: MDangerSteel Location: Canada Watch: Vintage Rolex Posts: 2,301	Joey, I've seen original dials and hands,that have slight inconsistency in patina between the dial and hands.The dial and hands may have been lumped by different suppliers using different tritium compounds, such as binder, making them darken slightly different. It is completely up to you to deside, but, that watch you're looking at, meets my criteria for a desirable example.Great condition of the metal, clean dial and hands.Im sure with a bit of patience, you'll find another original, clean example. Good luck in your search __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel

24 November 2015, 05:37 AM	#26
MitchSteel "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: MDangerSteel Location: Canada Watch: Vintage Rolex Posts: 2,301	Absolutely,bud Now, only you will know what you want and what sings to you. I'd personally, look for the best possible condition watch I can get at reasonable price....gotta consider both aspects,right. As for the bezel, yeah, it's the newer one, for sure, older beat up, faded bezel inserts can be bought and installed by you in a matter of seconds.Of course dials and hands can be sourced,adding cost of course,but you can also sell the dials,hands, inserts, etc that you don't want. That's the beauty of this hobby, the true pleasure of it is in the hunt. Good luck, Perserverence will pay off __________________ Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)