ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 January 2016, 06:08 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Posts: 8
|
Please bring back the 16000 series cases!
I am so disappointed in the new Rolex cases. The fat lugs and crown protectors look ridiculous. For that money I am totally not interested. I am looking at some older model New Never Worn 16570 and 16610LV. My advice to Rolex is to bring back the last model 16000 Series cases. At the very least reduce the lug width and crown guard width or put a 22mm bracelet on there. I also prefer the shape to the older models. it was more artful and masculine. I have yet to talk with anyone who likes the looks of this watch. Comments please!
|
15 January 2016, 07:24 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NZ
Watch: ♛ 16600
Posts: 98
|
maybe it looks ridiculous to you, but many people love it... a matter of taste
|
15 January 2016, 08:05 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
Please bring back the 16000 series cases!
I have to agree with the OP.
That's why my only "modern" option in the "sub-sea-GMT" line up was the SD4k.
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
15 January 2016, 08:07 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
15 January 2016, 09:05 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,947
|
Yup... Couldn't agree more! That is why I flipped my SubC LN for my SDC4K, and have never looked back. And, with as much as I love my Sub LVC based on that dial and bezel...it would get a lot more wrist time if it were of the same case dimensions as SDC4K!!!
|
15 January 2016, 09:30 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Alan
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 114270 16710B
Posts: 1,062
|
Welcome to the forum.
I agree with you, but many do love the new case dimensions. If I get a sub it will be a five-number reference, but hey, I'm an old fogey, what do I know? |
15 January 2016, 10:01 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Stephen
Location: London
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 115
|
I'm the opposite, I prefer the new case, the old crown guards look too dainty, pointy to me for a tool watch. if your gonna have guards and lugs have proper ones!
|
15 January 2016, 10:05 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
To each his own...but Rolex doesn't go backwards.
|
15 January 2016, 10:20 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
|
15 January 2016, 10:27 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
|
Welcome to the forum.
I appreciate both |
15 January 2016, 11:21 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
|
5 digit all the way!! I flipped my subc and wouldn't buy any of the new Rolex models.
|
15 January 2016, 11:59 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NZ
Watch: ♛ 16600
Posts: 98
|
|
16 January 2016, 12:28 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
Sales would suggest they made a move in the right direction. Lucky for you there are plenty of discontinued pieces to be had a great prices.
|
16 January 2016, 12:36 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
|
|
16 January 2016, 12:41 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Watch: 1680 Red & 16622
Posts: 2,449
|
It's really a matter of taste. While I tend to agree with you, there is obviously market for the 6 digit refs. Luckily there are tons of minty 5 digit refs available on the second hand market, as well as NOS pieces. Or is it the ceramic bezel / lume that you'd prefer on the 5 digit case?
Ever consider a 4 digit reference? 1680, 1665, 1675, 5513? I mean, talk about a time piece with some true character. Vintage is an incredible avenue to explore. |
16 January 2016, 12:45 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
There are a lot of watches out there, buy vintage
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
16 January 2016, 12:50 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
I prefer the new case and bracelet. In my opinion, Rolex made the right decision.
|
16 January 2016, 01:24 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jay
Location: NY Metropolitan
Watch: Many
Posts: 741
|
I actually like both old and new cases on the GMT/Sub's. The new oyster bracelets win hands down!!! The new fatter lugged and overall beefier cases were produced to meet the demands of the growing interest in large watches. IMO they did it well without going grotesque in size (I shall not reference the offending manufacturers).
I had a 14060M G Serial and the only thing I wasn't too keen on was the bracelet as it wasn't SEL like its Date version brother. The 2 polar 16570's I loved everything about them. My 2 subs and GMT are now all ceramic and I love them too. Yet to encounter a Rolex I didn't like |
16 January 2016, 01:26 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
welcome to the forum ,,, just vote with your wallet ,,,
|
16 January 2016, 01:33 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
Oh, well...
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
16 January 2016, 01:52 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 116610
Posts: 108
|
I love the new case, I would not have got the SubC if it wasn't for the new case.
It makes a 40mm wear much larger.
__________________
Instagram: Jeremy_S_I0123 |
16 January 2016, 01:55 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Carlos
Location: Eivissa
Watch: Rolex, Tudor....
Posts: 1,635
|
The only new case I really like is the SD4K. For other sub, GMT or Explorer II... 5 digits cases if need to choose!!
|
16 January 2016, 02:36 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
That's a pretty abrasive first post. There are many people here who not only like the new (not really new anymore) cases, but actually prefer them over the older generations.
I like the super cases personally, the way that the watch fits, feels, and looks can't be beat. The bracelets are much more to my liking being heavier and sturdier feeling. The ceramic inserts are almost magical how they reflect the light and remain flawless forever. I can appreciate where they came from, which is the earlier models. Each to their own.. |
16 January 2016, 02:46 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: SC
Watch: THC, Breitling GC
Posts: 70
|
I absolutely love the new super cases. I prefer something 42mm or above and have always lusted after a Sub. As such, the new 116610 models look like they fit the bill perfectly. NOW I just have to somehow get my hands on one!
|
16 January 2016, 02:58 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2016, 03:04 AM | #26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Well if you've never met anyone who likes the new case brace yourself, more than half the members here own one at least!
|
16 January 2016, 03:12 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: So Cal
Posts: 268
|
Sea Dweller 4000 FTW!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
16 January 2016, 03:43 AM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
Except, of course, downsizing the Day-Date to 40mm.
I'm in agreement with OP: there might have been room to make the lugs a little beefier, but Rolex went overboard. It simply does not look as clean on the wrist as the older series. There's no doubt the newer bracelet, bezel, crown guards are better, but stylistically I would welcome slimmer lugs.
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
16 January 2016, 04:08 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
|
+1 and also produced the SD4k... With narrower lugs...
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original. |
16 January 2016, 04:17 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.