ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

alpacino0077 · 9 July 2008, 09:53 PM

Which of the two watches do you prefer? There isn’t much difference when it comes to the price. UK AD prices are GMT £3600. LV £3280. You get more watch with the GMT - clasp, blue hairspring, wider bezel. LV – hollow links. It may just come down to the modern vs. the classic look. The LV would probably be the more recognisable Rolex. Interested in what TRF think…

vjb.knife · 9 July 2008, 10:27 PM

I have those two watches, except my GMTIIC is two tone. I would say that if you get in the water a lot the Sub would be the choice but if you travel a lot the GMT is the one to go with and even if you are just swimming and staying in shallow water the GMT is probably a better choice. The other consideration is that they may not be making that case design on the Sub LV in a couple of years so if you like that look it might be the way to go.

DeepSeaWatches · 9 July 2008, 10:34 PM

I still haven't warmed up to the super case as of yet, so I would probably go with the classic case over the new.

samsamabjack · 9 July 2008, 10:37 PM

God LV is beautiful....

TIGGRRR · 9 July 2008, 10:58 PM

I have seen both up close and the GMT is quite bright and it catches the eye for sure. I have the LV and if they were both the same price I would probably still chose the LV as it is less showy.

cr1ckett · 9 July 2008, 11:09 PM

I've got the GMT IIc and its a stunning watch. To be honest really still like the LV but if i had a choice, which i did, i would definately go for the GMT IIc. The extra £400 gives seemingly alot more. The GMT can track 3 times zones, plus has the new case, bracelet and ceremic bezel

On the grapevine, i hear theres a new subby on the horizon. I would get the GMT IIc now, then keep some cash aside for the new subby.
Thats what im doing anyway.

frostie · 10 July 2008, 12:16 AM

It's obvious

ROA · 10 July 2008, 01:13 AM

gmt2c for me and then save up again for a sub lv

DCG · 10 July 2008, 01:53 AM

GMT2c is a great feeling and solid watch and if Rolex ever Pepsi's the thing I will be ready to buy, however the SUB LV is still the classic case that screams Rolex so I prefer the LV so I got one. Remember it does not matter what we think try both on and just get the one that talks to yea.

shoppy · 10 July 2008, 02:20 AM

GMT IIc, all the way, a lot more for the buck.

Trurolexer · 10 July 2008, 03:53 AM

...LV...

NO DOUBT!!!

-Subsevens · 10 July 2008, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

...LV...

NO DOUBT!!!

Couldn't have said it better myself!!! Man do I love looking at my LV!!!

veilstylez · 10 July 2008, 08:58 AM

I have the GMTc and I would go with the C since it has all the updates. Trust me you'll love the watch. So if you like classic Rolexes..go with the LV nothing more classic. But if you like modern watches....GMTc is the choice. I do love the LV tho and am thinking about getting one sooner or later, i just like the GMTc more plus I like modern watches.

toph · 10 July 2008, 09:06 AM

I own the GMT II C and i tried on the LV on tuesday. There is no contest in my opinion the GMT wins by a mile. The ceramic bezel, polished centre links another time zone- it is much nicer and much more of a watch, in my humble opinion, but the LV is still a fantastic watch

taylor · 10 July 2008, 09:08 AM

IIC

mike · 10 July 2008, 09:12 AM

Not a lot I can add to whats already been said.

Vince makes a great point about the difference in case design. Don't overlook the ability to swap the LV insert should you want a bit of a different look.

I decided this was the way to go.

haakon59 · 10 July 2008, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vjb.knife

I have those two watches, except my GMTIIC is two tone. I would say that if you get in the water a lot the Sub would be the choice but if you travel a lot the GMT is the one to go with and even if you are just swimming and staying in shallow water the GMT is probably a better choice. The other consideration is that they may not be making that case design on the Sub LV in a couple of years so if you like that look it might be the way to go.

I would agree it's a lifestyle issue: what sorts of activities do you use the watch for more often? The GMTII has the newer ergonomic case and is a hot item right now. The LV would be the best choice if you dive, but swimming is OK with either one because the GMT II is still WR to 100 meters. The LV has larger markers on the dial. What do YOU need? That is the best way to decide; both are going to be excellent watches. Best of luck.

mborkow · 10 July 2008, 10:17 AM

Quote:

The LV has larger markers on the dial

LV and GMT IIc have the same dial markers (both have maxi dial).

The LV has the greater depth rating over the GMT IIc. If that matters to you, get the LV

tphan · 10 July 2008, 10:23 AM

it is hard to beat a submariner...however not too sure about one with green bezel.

Have try the GMT II C, it felt quite nice, like the bracelet and clasp much more than any of the submariner family.

Since already have a SS subdate I would go with the GMT II C

viper · 10 July 2008, 10:25 AM

LV all the way

veilstylez · 10 July 2008, 10:34 AM

One other thing....I use to hate how the numbers looked on the bezels of all GMTs, but the new ceramic is really nice ..you get used to it.

alpacino0077 · 10 July 2008, 11:13 AM

These are all very interesting opinions when it comes to choosing a model. Some people say which feature would be used is the watch to go for. But in all honesty I wonder how many Rolex owners actually use their watches features on a regular basis! Deep-sea diving, Daytona’s stopwatch? The two time zones may well be the most common.

briweed · 10 July 2008, 02:10 PM

My vote would be for the GMT IIc. Love the feel of the bracelet, plus the new subs are coming out in the next 6 months. The LV would be cool if it were a "anniversary model" (released back 4 years ago). Just my opinion.

BK

what3ver · 10 July 2008, 04:51 PM

I couldn't decide in the end either, so I got both! (well, a TT GMT).

veilstylez · 10 July 2008, 05:09 PM

you can't go wrong with this....I love this watch more than my Daytona some days.

SPORTSFAN · 10 July 2008, 06:49 PM

Hi,
I have the GMT II C also.
Just a point about the depth rating......The GMT II C has the triplock crown like the LV and the SD so I would think that it would be at least as capable as the Sub in that department.
I also believe that the new sub will use the same case as the GMT.

Regards Mike.

ROA · 10 July 2008, 07:02 PM

when some of the forummers suggested the LV since it is classic - they were referring to the case right? not the bezel colour?

cause i do have some friends who find the LV a bit gaudy due to the colour....i thought so as well, in the beginning...

but now am getting used to it and am beginning to acquire the taste for it, so to speak

i dont mind having one!!!

Gaijin · 11 July 2008, 10:44 AM

I own them both and the nod goes to the GMT II C. Just love that watch!

cmr · 11 July 2008, 11:30 AM

i bought the gmt2c and skipped the sub. it is a good thing as it turns out because i have hit the bezel on this thing 3 times and would have had to replace the lv insert every time. haven't even left a smudge on the ceramic.

airhkg · 13 July 2008, 03:40 PM

Why is the depth rating of the GMT only 100m? It appears to be in a identical case as the Sub (subtle differences) and have a Triplock crown? What's the diff? Thinner crystal? Thinner case wall to house a larger or fatter movmenent?

9 July 2008, 10:27 PM	#2
vjb.knife Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Vince Location: Pittsburgh, PA Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC Posts: 626	I have those two watches, sort of ..... I have those two watches, except my GMTIIC is two tone. I would say that if you get in the water a lot the Sub would be the choice but if you travel a lot the GMT is the one to go with and even if you are just swimming and staying in shallow water the GMT is probably a better choice. The other consideration is that they may not be making that case design on the Sub LV in a couple of years so if you like that look it might be the way to go.

9 July 2008, 10:34 PM	#3
DeepSeaWatches "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: United States Posts: 266	I still haven't warmed up to the super case as of yet, so I would probably go with the classic case over the new. __________________ Rolex: 16600 \| 116400 V Panerai: Fiddy \| 232 Sinn : U1

10 July 2008, 12:16 AM	#7
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	It's obvious __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

10 July 2008, 01:53 AM	#9
DCG "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Newport Beach, CA Watch: Sub LV Posts: 1,165	GMT2c is a great feeling and solid watch and if Rolex ever Pepsi's the thing I will be ready to buy, however the SUB LV is still the classic case that screams Rolex so I prefer the LV so I got one. Remember it does not matter what we think try both on and just get the one that talks to yea. __________________ Sub LV

10 July 2008, 09:06 AM	#14
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	I own the GMT II C and i tried on the LV on tuesday. There is no contest in my opinion the GMT wins by a mile. The ceramic bezel, polished centre links another time zone- it is much nicer and much more of a watch, in my humble opinion, but the LV is still a fantastic watch __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

9 July 2008, 10:37 PM	#4
samsamabjack Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Sardinia,Italy Posts: 46	God LV is beautiful....

9 July 2008, 10:58 PM	#5
TIGGRRR Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: UK Posts: 36	I have seen both up close and the GMT is quite bright and it catches the eye for sure. I have the LV and if they were both the same price I would probably still chose the LV as it is less showy.

9 July 2008, 11:09 PM	#6
cr1ckett Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: London Posts: 123	I've got the GMT IIc and its a stunning watch. To be honest really still like the LV but if i had a choice, which i did, i would definately go for the GMT IIc. The extra £400 gives seemingly alot more. The GMT can track 3 times zones, plus has the new case, bracelet and ceremic bezel On the grapevine, i hear theres a new subby on the horizon. I would get the GMT IIc now, then keep some cash aside for the new subby. Thats what im doing anyway.

10 July 2008, 01:13 AM	#8
ROA "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: North A Watch: 16710 Posts: 254	gmt2c for me and then save up again for a sub lv

10 July 2008, 02:20 AM	#10
shoppy "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Real Name: Simon Location: UK Watch: OP and daytona Posts: 1,783	GMT IIc, all the way, a lot more for the buck.

10 July 2008, 03:53 AM	#11
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	...LV... NO DOUBT!!!

10 July 2008, 08:58 AM	#13
veilstylez "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: so cali Posts: 1,253	I have the GMTc and I would go with the C since it has all the updates. Trust me you'll love the watch. So if you like classic Rolexes..go with the LV nothing more classic. But if you like modern watches....GMTc is the choice. I do love the LV tho and am thinking about getting one sooner or later, i just like the GMTc more plus I like modern watches.

10 July 2008, 09:08 AM	#15
taylor "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: StL Posts: 447	IIC

10 July 2008, 09:12 AM	#16
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Not a lot I can add to whats already been said. Vince makes a great point about the difference in case design. Don't overlook the ability to swap the LV insert should you want a bit of a different look. I decided this was the way to go.

10 July 2008, 10:23 AM	#19
tphan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 831	it is hard to beat a submariner...however not too sure about one with green bezel. Have try the GMT II C, it felt quite nice, like the bracelet and clasp much more than any of the submariner family. Since already have a SS subdate I would go with the GMT II C

10 July 2008, 10:25 AM	#20
viper "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Northeast Posts: 943	LV all the way __________________ 16610LV 16200 116600 116500

10 July 2008, 10:34 AM	#21
veilstylez "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: so cali Posts: 1,253	One other thing....I use to hate how the numbers looked on the bezels of all GMTs, but the new ceramic is really nice ..you get used to it.

10 July 2008, 11:13 AM	#22
alpacino0077 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: london Watch: Sub LV, GMTC Posts: 5	These are all very interesting opinions when it comes to choosing a model. Some people say which feature would be used is the watch to go for. But in all honesty I wonder how many Rolex owners actually use their watches features on a regular basis! Deep-sea diving, Daytona’s stopwatch? The two time zones may well be the most common.

10 July 2008, 02:10 PM	#23
briweed "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Real Name: BK Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 242	My vote would be for the GMT IIc. Love the feel of the bracelet, plus the new subs are coming out in the next 6 months. The LV would be cool if it were a "anniversary model" (released back 4 years ago). Just my opinion. BK

10 July 2008, 06:49 PM	#26
SPORTSFAN "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Mike Location: NW England Posts: 791	Hi, I have the GMT II C also. Just a point about the depth rating......The GMT II C has the triplock crown like the LV and the SD so I would think that it would be at least as capable as the Sub in that department. I also believe that the new sub will use the same case as the GMT. Regards Mike.

10 July 2008, 07:02 PM	#27
ROA "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: North A Watch: 16710 Posts: 254	when some of the forummers suggested the LV since it is classic - they were referring to the case right? not the bezel colour? cause i do have some friends who find the LV a bit gaudy due to the colour....i thought so as well, in the beginning... but now am getting used to it and am beginning to acquire the taste for it, so to speak i dont mind having one!!!

11 July 2008, 10:44 AM	#28
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	I own them both and the nod goes to the GMT II C. Just love that watch!

11 July 2008, 11:30 AM	#29
cmr "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: marcus Location: us, oklahoma Posts: 1,646	i bought the gmt2c and skipped the sub. it is a good thing as it turns out because i have hit the bezel on this thing 3 times and would have had to replace the lv insert every time. haven't even left a smudge on the ceramic. __________________ cmr OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona,

13 July 2008, 03:40 PM	#30
airhkg Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Hong Kong Watch: Sub, SMP GMT Co-Ax Posts: 193	Why is the depth rating of the GMT only 100m? It appears to be in a identical case as the Sub (subtle differences) and have a Triplock crown? What's the diff? Thinner crystal? Thinner case wall to house a larger or fatter movmenent?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)